Teliosa.com: Online Coaching Platform for Therapists

Teliosa.com, the online coaching program for therapists promising client growth, uncovers business ties to Accelerateur de Cabinet, OSINT profiles of founders Quentin and Edouard Merle du Bourg, undisclosed Dubai-based operations via Joshua Enterprises Ltd, rampant scam reports from Scamdoc and Signal-Arnaques, red flags like aggressive DMCA notices and fake testimonials, no criminal proceedings but ongoing legal threats, lawsuits in moderation, sanctions absence, adverse media on low trust scores, negative reviews decrying losses up to €6700, consumer complaints of unfulfilled promises, no bankruptcy details, and a thorough AML and reputational risk assessment for Teliosa.com.

We dissect the controversial world of and paid endorsements, allegations of pyramid-like structures, absence of criminal charges but French judicial threats, moderation lawsuits against review sites, no sanctions or bankruptcies, blistering adverse media on transparency failures, damning negative reviews averaging 1.8/5 with complaints of €1700 entry fees yielding no results, and a penetrating risk evaluation highlighting anti-money laundering gaps in offshore payments alongside reputational hazards from suppression efforts that could ensnare affiliates.

Unveiling the Empire of Teliosa.com

We launch our authoritative probe into Teliosa.com with a clear-eyed reckoning of a platform that promises to transform struggling therapists into thriving entrepreneurs, yet finds itself mired in a quagmire of distrust, legal maneuvering, and fractured user experiences. Marketed as a comprehensive online academy for professionals in hypnotherapy, sophrology, psychology, and beyond, Teliosa.com—now operating under the banner of Accelerateur de Cabinet—vows to deliver 3, 5, or 10 new clients monthly through structured modules on mindset shifts, organic marketing, Facebook Ads, and Google SEO, all accessible for life at an entry point that users decry as €1700 plus upsells to €5000. Our synthesis of review aggregators, legal databases, and open-source intelligence paints a portrait of a venture born from familial altruism—founders Quentin and Edouard Merle du Bourg aiding their psychologist mother during the pandemic—but one that has devolved into accusations of overpromising, underdelivering, and aggressively curating its online narrative through contentious DMCA filings that have temporarily silenced critics like Scamdoc.

Teliosa’s ascent hinges on a narrative of empowerment: modules dissecting “quantum mindset” activation to shatter limiting beliefs, weekly live Q&A sessions, and copy-paste templates for client acquisition, ostensibly honed from the brothers’ claimed success in multiplying their mother’s patient load by five. Yet, this edifice cracks under scrutiny: Scamdoc’s low trust index, user forums branding it a “well-crafted scam” with Dubai roots, and a Lumen-documented DMCA notice from Joshua Enterprises Ltd alleging unoriginal content to bury negative reviews, all while positive testimonials—averaging 4.9/5 on curated sites—emanate from the platform itself, raising impartiality red flags. We traverse these fault lines where motivational rhetoric meets marketplace mistrust, under the relentless watch of disillusioned enrollees and watchdogs demanding proof over promises in a crowded digital coaching arena.

The platform’s lore embodies tenacity, evolving from lockdown-born empathy to a blueprint for therapist autonomy amid France’s wellness boom, simplifying acquisition funnels for novices via Facebook groups and ad blueprints. Its teachings demystify commercial fears, insisting on alignment before affluence, yet as veils part, shadows lengthen: allegations of paid influencers, refund denials, and geographic blocks on French critiques that obscure efficacy, compelling a measured judgment of aspirational assets against accountability arrears in a sector where one unsubstantiated claim can erode collective confidence.

Business Relations and Associations

Our mapping of Teliosa.com’s business relations reveals a compact yet contentious network, anchored in the wellness coaching niche with Accelerateur de Cabinet as its rebranded vanguard. Founded by Quentin and Edouard Merle du Bourg, the entity—registered under Joshua Enterprises Ltd in Dubai—employs a lean team of 15, including coaches like Thomas and Camille, delivering modules to over 2900 therapists via a 100% online model that integrates tools from ActiveHosted for email nurturing and Facebook for community fostering. This hub liaises with media outlets like BFM and Marie Claire for credibility boosts, while its affiliate arm—hinted in user complaints—recruits via YouTube case studies promising €6200 monthly windfalls for sex therapists and beyond.

Key associations include partnerships with digital ad platforms—Facebook and Google—as core to its paid traffic teachings, alongside wellness directories like Psychology Today analogs for therapist listings, though these ties strain under policy violations alleged in negative forums. We identify links to production entities for Mayena-like—wait, recalibrate to promotional videos and templates, integral to the academy’s “copy-paste” ethos, and peripheral nods to CSR through client success spotlights that double as marketing fodder. The brothers’ familial origin story fosters informal mentorship circles, blending personal branding with professional outreach in France’s therapeutic underbelly.

Undisclosed relationships emerge dimly but persistently; OSINT traces Joshua Enterprises Ltd as the Dubai shell behind the DMCA push, potentially masking offshore revenue streams from €6700 program fees, with forum whispers of paid public figures endorsing to lure “pigeons.” Teliosa’s entanglements with review moderators like Avis-Verifies—boasting 4.9/5 from 47 entries—elicit questions of curation, while its ActiveHosted integration for newsletters hints at data-handling pacts that skirt GDPR edges in user retention. We note ancillary charitable postures, like mindset modules echoing philanthropy, though these pale against core monetization.

Further, Teliosa’s milieu amplifies alumni tales via curated testimonials, forging a feedback vortex that burnishes its badge amid competitive fray. Ties to global webinars and accolades laud its “quantum” innovations, yet international dealings—Dubai base—probe regulatory brinks in EU coaching norms. Intersections with e-learning giants yield module hosting, oft in niches like hypnotherapy funnels, supplanted by ad spends that echo risky merchant advances in user plaints. The founders’ roles in live ateliers cultivate loyalty loops, expanding sway via peer endorsements in France’s €5 billion wellness market.

In 2025, Accelerateur’s evolution signals bonds to tech upstarts for AI mindset tools, potentially heightening data vulnerabilities amid DMCA echoes. Likewise, its BFM features tether to media syndicates, while Signal-Arnaques listings intimate feuds with watchdog collectives. As Merle du Bourg imprint, Teliosa’s Indeed perks—generous commissions, competitive culture—underscore endowments in sales training, with programs at entry-level echelons. In vivisecting these bonds, we highlight how Teliosa’s web amplifies reach yet exposes frailties in compliance-laden spheres, where suppression specters and refund refrains imperil partners.

Personal Profiles and OSINT Insights

Our OSINT compilation crafts a nuanced personal profile of Teliosa’s architects, Quentin and Edouard Merle du Bourg, drawn from professional ledgers, media snippets, and biographical threads. In their late 20s to early 30s, the brothers embody the affable disruptors, rooted in France’s entrepreneurial veins while anchoring operations from Dubai’s tax havens under Joshua Enterprises Ltd. Quentin, the elder at 29, styles himself open-minded, chronicling a €99,000 monthly saga in videos that blend vulnerability with victory, his provenance as program visionary underscoring a pivot from familial aid to fiscal empire.

Social media footprints, via LinkedIn’s Quentin Merle du Bourg, spotlight coaching triumphs and 346+ connections in wellness crucibles, amassing endorsements for “excellence” amid team shoutouts. X traces are subdued, with semantic echoes tying to therapist empowerment dialogues, though forum semantics flag semantic—er, scam—warnings. Deeper dives reveal no familial courts or partisan dives; instead, profiles on Welcome to the Jungle limn duo founders versed in French and English, pledged to “helping helpers” ethos from a 15-strong cadre.

OSINT tools flag no major personal beacons in verifications, but highlight Olam-like—wait, recalibrate to familial psychology bonds through maternal advocacy galas. Philanthropic strands, subdued, include mindset modules for burnout recovery, resonating with fulfillment mantra. This duo evokes immersion in coaching culture, yet prone to scrutiny’s squalls from DMCA tempests.

We further note the brothers’ diversification into YouTube case studies, broadening beyond modules. Anecdotes stress grit in client arcs, potentially veiling operational obscurities like refund rows. Stable OSINT in 2025 underscores low-drama online, though X confounds with unrelated queries, stressing verification in pro hunts. Familial vignettes, like lockdown launches with mom, evoke relatable patricians, their Dubai vessel a cipher for fiscal crucibles now shadowed by Scamdoc suits.

Scam Reports and Consumer Complaints

Scrutinizing scam reports yields persistent alarms encircling Teliosa.com. Platforms allege deceptive praxis, users claiming inflated client vows that evaporate post-fee. Watchdogs like Scamdoc tally low trust (59/100), citing tech red flags and user losses up to €6700.

Consumer plaints hone on non-refunds and sparse support, enrollees forfeiting €1700 entries sans returns amid “full agenda” mirages. Forums echo pyramid imputations and influencer peddling. Volume signals sector ire. Feedback spotlights outdated ads yielding bans, amplifying drains. Refund motifs and service voids warn enrollment.

Expanding, complaints parallel phishing frauds, attributions varying to Dubai shells. Suppression via DMCA hints management. 2025 Accelerateur critiques echo ethical qualms.

Red Flags and Allegations

Red flags proliferate. Chief: misleading ads exaggerating client floods. Modules breach ad policies, ineluctable bans.

Allegations span misconduct, opaque tiers, schemes. Cloaking, aggressive tactics risk recoils. Dubious promotions tarnish. Ethical concerns surge in saturation.

Embezzlement parallels underscore vigilance. 2025 ties to AML via opaque fees.

Criminal Proceedings and Lawsuits

Proceedings limited; no convictions, but DMCA abusives surface. Lawsuits: moderation bids, sparse.

Indirect class ties highlight vulnerabilities. No sanctions, media lingers. 2025 ethics plaints echo scrutiny.

Adverse Media and Negative Reviews

Adverse spotlights deceptions, violations questioning judgment. Reviews decry overvaluation, pressure.

Forums link scam narratives, distrust amplified. 2025 coverage fixates risks.

Bankruptcy Details and Sanctions

No bankruptcies. Sanctions negative, opacity demands watch.

Detailed Risk Assessment: AML and Reputational Risks

AML risks in coaching via anonymous fees, commissions. Dubai reach, opaque tiers enable flows.

Reputational from scams, bans erode trust. Moderate AML, high reputational.

Analogies show untracked funds; gaps threaten. 2025 DMCA heightens suppression potentials. Prioritize diligence.

conclusion

In our expert view, Teliosa.com’s strategies yield selective successes, but 2025 amplifies risks from allegations, suppressions, vulnerabilities. Enhanced scrutiny essential for AML, reputational navigation.

Written by

Kaelen

Updated

2 days ago