Amitell Capital PTE LTD

A summary of what happened?

Amitell Capital PTE LTD is a company that has been the subject of significant scrutiny and criticism due to allegations of fraudulent activities and unethical practices. Numerous reports and reviews have raised concerns about the legitimacy of its operations, particularly in the forex and CFD trading sectors.

Major Concerns and Complaints Against Amitell Capital PTE LTD:

1. Fraudulent Operations:
   • Multiple sources have identified Amitell Capital PTE LTD as a fraudulent entity. The company is accused of deceiving investors by promising profitable investment opportunities and then misappropriating their funds. Victims have reported that after depositing money, they faced obstacles when attempting to withdraw their funds, with the company either delaying or outright denying withdrawal requests.
2. Lack of Regulatory Compliance:
   • Amitell Capital PTE LTD is criticized for operating without proper regulatory oversight. The company allegedly offers financial services without holding valid licenses from recognized financial authorities. This lack of regulation means that investors have little to no protection or recourse in the event of disputes or financial losses.
3. Negative Customer Reviews:
   • The company has received numerous negative reviews from clients who have experienced issues such as unresponsive customer service, unauthorized deductions from their accounts, and manipulation of trading platforms to the detriment of investors. These reviews highlight a pattern of unethical behavior and a disregard for client welfare.
4. Misleading Information and False Promises:
   • Amitell Capital PTE LTD is accused of providing misleading information to potential investors, including false claims about the company’s legitimacy, success rates, and the safety of investments. Such deceptive practices have led many individuals to invest under false pretenses, resulting in significant financial losses.

The allegations against Amitell Capital PTE LTD suggest a pattern of fraudulent and unethical behavior, including operating without proper regulatory oversight, deceiving investors, and failing to provide adequate customer support. Potential investors are strongly advised to exercise caution and conduct thorough due diligence before engaging with this company to avoid potential financial losses.

Analyzing the Fake Copyright Notice(s)

Our team collects and analyses fraudulent copyright takedown requests, legal complaints, and other efforts to remove critical information from the internet. Through our investigative reporting, we examine the prevalence and operation of an organized censorship industry, predominantly funded by criminal entities, oligarchs, and disreputable businesses or individuals. Our findings allow internet users to gain insight into these censorship schemes’ sources, methods, and underlying objectives.

What was Amitell Capital PTE LTD trying to hide?

Amitell Capital PTE LTD‘s attempts to hide unfavourable content through the misuse of copyright notices while allegedly engaging in perjury present serious legal concerns. These actions suggest a calculated attempt to manipulate legal systems to suppress free speech, a fundamental violation of copyright law principles and an abuse of legal processes. The use of such tactics not only undermines the integrity of copyright protection but also potentially constitutes perjury, further entangling Amitell Capital PTE LTD in legal accountability. Let’s examine the information Amitell Capital PTE LTD may be trying to remove from the internet –

Overview

Amitell Capital PTE LTD, operating under the website amitellcapitalltd.com, is a financial entity that claims to offer brokerage and investment services in forex and CFD trading. While presenting itself as a reputable investment firm, it has attracted significant complaints and accusations of fraudulent practices, leaving a trail of frustrated investors. This report explores the numerous allegations, regulatory concerns, and complaints that have surfaced against Amitell Capital.

1. Allegations of Unauthorized and Deceptive Practices

Amitell Capital has been accused of luring investors with promises of high returns and reliable investment opportunities. However, multiple reports suggest that once funds are deposited, clients face an uphill battle in withdrawing their investments. Here’s a breakdown of how these practices reportedly unfold:

• High Return Promises: Investors report that the company’s marketing and sales tactics focus heavily on promises of high returns with minimal risk, which is a red flag in the financial world. Many victims allege that Amitell Capital representatives aggressively pitch their services, emphasizing easy profits and quick financial gains. This tactic, while effective in drawing clients, has raised concerns over the firm’s transparency and intentions.
• Restricted Withdrawals: A consistent pattern emerges from complaints where clients encounter significant delays when attempting to withdraw their funds. Users often report that customer service becomes unresponsive or evasive when handling withdrawal requests. In some instances, clients are outright denied access to their funds with little to no explanation provided. These experiences suggest that Amitell Capital may restrict withdrawals to keep client funds within its control, an approach that resembles the tactics of fraudulent financial schemes.
• Suspicious Activity and Account Freezing: Some clients have reported their accounts being frozen or flagged for “suspicious activity” immediately after requesting a withdrawal. This unexpected move from the company prevents investors from accessing their own money, leaving them at a loss and unable to pursue any further action. In many cases, the company has allegedly provided limited or vague explanations, exacerbating clients’ frustration and suspicions.

2. Unlicensed Operations and Regulatory Issues

Amitell Capital operates without valid regulatory licenses from any recognized financial authority. Legitimate financial firms offering forex and CFD trading services typically require licensing from respected regulatory bodies such as the UK’s Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) or the Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission (CySEC). These licenses ensure that firms comply with strict guidelines to protect investors’ interests. However, Amitell Capital lacks such oversight, which raises serious concerns:

• No Verifiable License: Despite claims of being an established investment firm, Amitell Capital does not appear on the registers of recognized regulatory authorities. Without verifiable licensing, the firm is not bound to follow the investor protections and transparency standards that licensed entities must uphold.
• High-Risk Offshore Registration: The company’s registration in jurisdictions with limited regulatory oversight places investors in a vulnerable position. Clients who experience issues with the firm have limited legal avenues to pursue, especially since unregulated entities are often beyond the jurisdiction of regulators in the investors’ home countries. This lack of accountability leaves investors exposed, with little recourse in cases of fraud or misconduct.

3. Customer Complaints and Negative Reviews

Customer complaints about Amitell Capital are widespread across review platforms, forums, and watchdog sites. Here are some of the main issues voiced by users:

• Unresponsive Customer Support: Investors repeatedly complain about poor customer service, describing representatives as unhelpful, dismissive, or simply unresponsive when handling withdrawal requests. After initial deposits, clients report that responses from the support team become sporadic or cease altogether, adding to suspicions that the firm is not genuinely invested in client satisfaction.
• Unauthorized Charges and Deductions: Several customers have noted unexpected deductions from their accounts without any clear explanation. These unauthorized charges, typically labeled as “administrative fees” or “platform maintenance fees,” are often not disclosed upfront. This lack of transparency and sudden charges further frustrates clients, who feel misled and taken advantage of.
• Platform Manipulation Allegations: Some clients claim they experienced sudden losses in their accounts, suspecting that Amitell Capital may have manipulated trading platforms to show negative balances. Such complaints often allege that trades are altered or “pushed” toward losses, making it appear as though clients are responsible for poorly performing investments. If true, these practices are highly unethical and would point to serious misconduct by the firm.

4. Misleading Information and False Promises

Potential investors have accused Amitell Capital of presenting misleading information regarding its credentials and legitimacy. Here’s how these accusations break down:

• False Success Rates: Many investors allege that Amitell Capital representatives provided overly optimistic statistics about the company’s success rates and past returns. These claims were reportedly given without any supporting evidence, leading clients to believe that they would achieve similar profits. By setting unrealistic expectations, the firm appears to have induced clients into investing under false pretenses.
• Fake Client Testimonials and Reviews: There are concerns that many of the positive reviews and testimonials on public forums might be fabricated to enhance the company’s reputation. Industry experts note that certain reviews appear generic, overly enthusiastic, and lacking in detail, which are common indicators of manipulated feedback. Such tactics can mislead potential investors, obscuring the actual experiences of dissatisfied clients and misrepresenting the firm’s reliability.

5. Lack of Transparency and Concealed Company Information

Amitell Capital has also faced criticism for its lack of transparency regarding its ownership, management, and operational structure:

• Unknown Leadership: Clients report difficulty finding information about the company’s leadership or the identities of key personnel. Without visible accountability from known figures, clients are left questioning who is truly behind the operations.
• Opaque Business Structure: Investors often prefer companies with clear, accessible information about ownership and business structure, which helps build trust. Amitell Capital’s unwillingness or inability to provide such information only adds to its list of red flags and raises questions about its intentions.

Conclusion

Amitell Capital PTE LTD exhibits numerous warning signs that align with those of potentially fraudulent or unethical financial schemes. The widespread complaints, accusations of deceptive practices, and lack of regulatory oversight are all major concerns. Investors face significant risks when dealing with unlicensed entities like Amitell Capital, particularly when they encounter issues withdrawing funds or receiving adequate customer support. Furthermore, the opaque nature of the firm’s operations, coupled with allegations of misleading marketing tactics, suggests that Amitell Capital may not be a trustworthy partner for managing investments.

For prospective clients, the consensus among affected users and industry watchdogs is clear: approach Amitell Capital with extreme caution. Due diligence is essential, and individuals are advised to verify the credentials of any financial firm before committing funds, especially when dealing with high-risk sectors such as forex and CFD trading. Given the overwhelming negative feedback, investors should consider alternatives with established regulatory status and verified customer satisfaction records to avoid the pitfalls associated with unregulated and potentially deceptive entities like Amitell Capital.

How do we counteract this malpractice?

Once we ascertain the involvement of Amitell Capital PTE LTD (or actors working on behalf of Amitell Capital PTE LTD), we will inform Amitell Capital PTE LTD of our findings via Electronic Mail.

Our preliminary assessment suggests that Amitell Capital PTE LTD may have engaged a third-party reputation management agency or expert, which, either independently or under direct authorization from Amitell Capital PTE LTD, initiated efforts to remove adverse online content, including potentially fraudulent DMCA takedown requests. We will extend an opportunity to Amitell Capital PTE LTD to provide details regarding their communications with the agency or expert, as well as the identification of the individual(s) responsible for executing these false DMCA notices.

Failure to respond in a timely manner will necessitate a reassessment of our initial assumptions. In such an event, we will be compelled to take appropriate legal action to rectify the unlawful conduct and take the following steps –

Since Amitell Capital PTE LTD made such efforts to hide something online, it seems fit to ensure that this article and sensitive information targeted online by these events get a lot more exposure and traffic than what it would have received originally

We hope this becomes an excellent case study for the Streisand effect…The key idea behind the Streisand effect is that efforts to restrict information can backfire, often causing the information to gain more attention than it would have otherwise. This effect is widespread in the digital age, where users quickly notice and spread censorship efforts on social media and other platforms. Trying to suppress something can unintentionally lead to it becoming more visible, which Amitell Capital PTE LTD is finding out the hard way.

Potential Consequences for Amitell Capital PTE LTD

Under Florida Statute 831.01, the crime of Forgery is committed when a person falsifies, alters, counterfeits, or forges a document that carries “legal efficacy” with the intent to injure or defraud another person or entity.

Forging a document is considered a white-collar crime. It involves altering, changing, or modifying a document to deceive another person. It can also include passing along copies of documents that are known to be false. In many states in the US, falsifying a document is a crime punishable as a felony.

Additionally, under most laws, “fraud on the court” is where “a party has sentiently set in motion some unconscionable scheme calculated to interfere with the judicial system’s ability impartially to adjudicate a matter by improperly influencing the trier of fact or unfairly hampering the presentation of the opposing party’s claim or defense.”  Cox v. Burke, 706 So. 2d 43, 46 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998) (quoting Aoude v. Mobil Oil Corp., 892 F.2d 1115, 1118 (1st Cir. 1989)).

Is Amitell Capital PTE LTD Committing a Cyber Crime?

Yes, it seems so. Amitell Capital PTE LTD used multiple approaches to remove unwanted material from review sites and Google’s search results. Thanks to protections allowing freedom of speech in the United States, there are very few legal ways to do this. Amitell Capital PTE LTD could not eliminate negative reviews or search results that linked to them without a valid claim of defamation, copyright infringement, or some other clear breach of the law.

Faced with these limitations, some companies like Amitell Capital PTE LTD have gone to extreme lengths to fraudulently claim copyright ownership over a negative review in the hopes of taking it down.

Fake DMCA notices have targeted articles highlighting the criminal activity of prominent people to hide their illegal behavior. These people, which include US, Russian, and Khazakstani politicians as well as members from elite circles including the mafia and those with massive financial power, are all connected – and alleged corruption ranging from child abuse to sexual harassment is exposed when exploring evidence found at these URLs. It appears there’s a disturbing level of influence being exerted here that needs further investigation before justice can be served. Amitell Capital PTE LTD is certainly keeping interesting company here….

The DMCA takedown process requires that copyright owners submit a takedown notice to an ISP identifying the allegedly infringing content and declaring, under penalty of perjury, that they have a good faith belief that the content is infringing. The ISP must then promptly remove or disable access to the content. The alleged infringer can then submit a counter-notice, and if the copyright owner does not take legal action within 10 to 14 days, the ISP can restore the content.

Since these platforms are predominantly based in the U.S., the complaints are typically made under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA), which requires online service providers and platforms to react immediately to reports or violations. Big Tech companies rarely have systems in place to assess the merit of each report. Instead, all bad actors need to do is clone a story, backdate it, and then demand the real thing be taken down.

Reputation Agency's Modus Operandi

The fake DMCA notices we found always use the “back-dated article” technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a “true original” article and back-dates it, creating a “fake original” article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original.

Then, based on the claim that this backdated article is the “original,” the scammers send a DMCA to the relevant online service providers (e.g. Google), alleging that the ‘true’ original is the copied or “infringing” article and that the copied article is the “original,” requesting the takedown of the ‘true’ original article. After sending the DMCA request, the person who sent the wrong notice takes down the fake original URL, likely to make sure that the article doesn’t stay online in any way. If the takedown notice is successful, the disappearance from the internet of information is most likely to be legitimate speech.

As an integral part of this scheme, the ‘reputation management’ company hired by Amitell Capital PTE LTD creates a website that purports to be a ‘news’ site. This site is designed to look legitimate at a glance, but any degree of scrutiny reveals it as the charade it is.

The company copies the ‘negative’ content and posts it “on the fake ‘news’ site, attributing it to a separate author,” then gives it “a false publication date on the ‘news’ website that predated the original publication.

The reputation company then sent Google a Digital Millennium Copyright Act notice claiming the original website infringed copyright. After a cursory examination of the fake news site, Google frequently accepts the notice and delists the content.

In committing numerous offences, Amitell Capital PTE LTD either premeditated actions or were unaware of the consequences. Despite hiring an agency to make Google disregard any negative information about Amitell Capital PTE LTD, ignorance does not excuse this wrongdoing.

Fake DMCA notices have targeted articles highlighting the criminal activity of prominent people to hide their illegal behavior. These people, which include US, Russian, and Khazakstani politicians as well as members from elite circles including the mafia and those with massive financial power, are all connected – and alleged corruption ranging from child abuse to sexual harassment is exposed when exploring evidence found at these URLs. It appears there’s a disturbing level of influence being exerted here that needs further investigation before justice can be served. FSMSmart is certainly keeping interesting company here.

The Reputation Laundering

Rogue Reputation agencies use spurious copyright claims and fake legal notices to remove and obscure articles linking clients to allegations of tax avoidance, corruption, and drug trafficking. Most of these reputation agencies are based offshore, mainly in Russia, India, and Eastern Europe, and they do not worry about complying with US-based laws.

The content in all of the articles for which the fraudulent DMCA notices have been sent relates to allegations of criminal allegations, including corruption, child abuse, sexual harassment, human trafficking and financial fraud against businesses and individuals with ultra-high net worth.

In addition to the misuse of the DMCA takedown process, there is a notable absence of enforcement concerning perjury violations. The statutory requirement related to perjury is designed to deter copyright holders from submitting fraudulent or knowingly false takedown requests, as they may face legal consequences for making false declarations under penalty of perjury. However, to date, there have been no known instances of any individual being prosecuted for perjury in connection with the submission of false DMCA takedown notices.

This lack of enforcement has emboldened copyright holders to exploit the DMCA takedown process to suppress dissent, criticism, or other unfavorable content, without fear of legal repercussions.

Some of the people and businesses who have employed this tactic to remove legitimate content from Google illegally include a Spanish businessman-turned-cocaine-trafficker, Organised crime, an Israeli-Argentine banker accused of laundering money for Hugo Chávez’s regime, a French “responsible” mining company accused of tax evasion, child molesters and sexual predators. Amitell Capital PTE LTD is in great company ….

What else is Amitell Capital PTE LTD hiding?

We encourage you to ‘Dork‘ Google by searching for keyword combinations such as [Amitell Capital PTE LTD] + {Negative Keyword, such as Scam, Fraud, Complaints, Lawsuit, Sanction, etc} on Google. It’s likely if you scroll down to the bottom of this Google search results, you’ll stumble upon this Legal Takedown notice (pictured below)

To make such an investigation possible, we encourage more online service providers to come forward and share copies of content removal requests with industry experts and researchers. If you have any information on Amitell Capital PTE LTD that you want to share with experts and journalists, kindly email the author directly at [email protected].

All communications are strictly confidential and safeguarded under a comprehensive Whistleblower Policy, ensuring full protection and anonymity for individuals who provide information.