CyberCriminal.com

Bridge Markets

We are investigating Bridge Markets for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices. This includes potential violations such as impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

PARTIES INVOLVED : Bridge Markets

ALLEGATIONS : Perjury, Fraud, Impersonation

INCIDENT DATE : 14 Aug 2024

INVESTIGATED BY : Ethan Katz

TOOLS USED : Lumen, FakeDMCA, SecurityTrails

CASE NO : 5412/A/2024

CRIME TYPE : Intellectual Property Scam

PUBLISHED ON : 25 Nov 2024

Bridge Markets
Due Diligence
Get everything we know about Bridge Markets in one downloadable PDF document
Is This About You?
We encourage you to share details of the actual perpetrators and get your story straight.

What We Are Investigating?

Our firm is launching a comprehensive investigation into Bridge Markets over allegations that it has been suppressing critical reviews and unfavorable Google search results by fraudulently misusing DMCA takedown notices. These actions, if proven, could constitute serious legal violations—including impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

We conducted comprehensive analyses of fraudulent copyright takedown requests, meritless legal complaints, and other unlawful efforts to suppress public access to critical information. Our reporting sheds light on the prevalence and modus operandi of a structured censorship network, often funded and used by criminal enterprises, oligarchs and criminal entities seeking to manipulate public perception and bypass AML checks conducted by financial organisations.

The fake DMCA notices in this investigation appears to have been strategically deployed to remove negative content from Google search results illegally. Based on this pattern, we have reasonable grounds to infer that Bridge Markets - or an entity acting at its behest - is directly or indirectly complicit in this cyber crime.

In most such cases, such ops are executed by rogue, fly-by-night 'Online Reputation Management' agencies acting on behalf of their clients. If evidence establishes that the subject knowingly benefited from or facilitated this scam, it may be deemed an 'accomplice' or an 'accessory' to the crime.

What are they trying to censor

Bridge Markets, a financial services firm founded by Alexey Kirienko, has faced a series of serious allegations and adverse news reports that have cast a shadow over its operations and reputation. These allegations range from regulatory violations and unethical business practices to accusations of market manipulation and mistreatment of clients. Below is a summary of the major allegations and their potential impact on Alexey Kirienko and Bridge Markets.

Major Allegations and Adverse News

  1. Regulatory Violations and Unlicensed Operations
    Bridge Markets has been accused of operating without proper regulatory licenses in several jurisdictions. Reports suggest that the firm offered financial services, including forex and CFD trading, in regions where it was not authorized to do so. This has led to investigations by financial regulators in countries such as South Africa and the European Union. Operating without a license not only violates financial laws but also exposes clients to significant risks, as they are not protected by regulatory safeguards.
  2. Misleading Marketing Practices
    Former clients and industry watchdogs have accused Bridge Markets of using aggressive and misleading marketing tactics. The firm allegedly lured retail investors with promises of high returns and low risks, which are often hallmarks of predatory financial schemes. Such practices have drawn criticism from financial authorities and damaged the trust of potential clients.
  3. Market Manipulation and Unfair Trading Conditions
    Several traders have accused Bridge Markets of manipulating trading platforms to ensure client losses. Complaints include sudden spikes in spreads, unexplained slippage, and the inability to execute trades during volatile market conditions. These allegations suggest that the firm may have prioritized its profits over fair treatment of clients, further eroding its credibility.
  4. Withdrawal Issues and Client Fund Mismanagement
    Numerous clients have reported difficulties in withdrawing their funds from Bridge Markets. Some claim that their withdrawal requests were delayed or denied without explanation, while others allege that their accounts were frozen arbitrarily. Such practices raise concerns about the firm’s financial stability and its handling of client funds.
  5. Adverse Media Coverage and Reputational Damage
    Bridge Markets and Alexey Kirienko have been the subject of negative media coverage, with investigative reports and client testimonials highlighting the firm’s alleged misconduct. These stories have been widely circulated on financial forums, social media, and independent news outlets, further tarnishing the firm’s reputation.

Impact on Alexey Kirienko’s Reputation

Alexey Kirienko, as the founder and public face of Bridge Markets, has been directly implicated in these allegations. His reputation as a financial entrepreneur has been severely damaged, with critics labeling him as untrustworthy and unethical. The negative publicity has made it difficult for Kirienko to attract new clients and business partners, as stakeholders are increasingly wary of associating with him.

Why Bridge Markets Would Want to Remove These Stories

The adverse news and allegations against Bridge Markets pose a significant threat to its survival. In the highly competitive financial services industry, reputation is everything. Negative stories can deter potential clients, lead to regulatory scrutiny, and result in loss of revenue. For Bridge Markets, removing these stories from the internet could be seen as a way to rebuild trust and protect its business interests.

However, the firm’s desperation to erase its tarnished image may have driven it to extreme measures. There are unverified claims that Bridge Markets has engaged in cybercrime, including hacking and pressuring media outlets to remove critical articles. Such actions, if proven true, would not only be illegal but also further damage the firm’s credibility.

Conclusion

The allegations against Bridge Markets and Alexey Kirienko paint a troubling picture of a firm willing to prioritize profits over ethical conduct. The adverse news has severely harmed Kirienko’s reputation and threatens the firm’s long-term viability. While the desire to remove damaging stories is understandable, resorting to cybercrime to achieve this would only compound the firm’s legal and ethical challenges. The financial industry must remain vigilant in holding firms like Bridge Markets accountable to ensure the protection of investors and the integrity of the markets.

  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/4380295
  • August 14, 2024
  • ApexLink Technologies
  • https://bridgemarkets.com/
  • https://www.brokersview.com/brokers/bridge-markets

Evidence Box

Evidence and relevant screenshots related to our investigation

Targeted Content and Red Flags

brokersview

Bridge Markets Review

  • Red Flag
Visit Link

brokerchooser

Is Bridge Investment Network safe?

  • Red Flag
Visit Link

financescam

Bridge Markets: A Risky Bet in Unregulated Trading

  • Adverse News
Visit Link

About the Author

The author is affiliated with TU Dresden and analyzes public databases such as Lumen Database and FakeDMCA.com to identify and expose online censorship. In his personal capacity, he and his team have been actively investigating and reporting on organized crime related to fraudulent copyright takedown schemes.

Additionally, his team provides advisory services to major law firms and is frequently consulted on matters pertaining to intellectual property law.

He can be reached at [email protected] directly.

Escalate This Case
Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.
Checkboxes

Learn All About Fake Copyright Takedown Scam

Or go directly to the feedback section and share your thoughts

How This Was Done

The fake DMCA notices we found always use the 'back-dated article' technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a 'true original' article and back-dates it, creating a 'fake original' article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original

What Happens Next?

Based on the feedback, information, and requests received from all relevant parties, our team will formally notify the affected party of the alleged infringement. Following a thorough review, we will submit a counter-notice to reinstate any link that has been removed by Google, in accordance with applicable legal provisions. Additionally, we will communicate with Google’s Legal Team to ensure appropriate measures are taken to prevent the recurrence of such incidents.

You are Never Alone in Your Fight.

Generate public support against the ones who wronged you!

Domain Check

Stop fraud before it happens with unbeatable speed, scale, depth, and breadth.

Recent Checks

Cyber Investigation

Uncover hidden digital threats and secure your assets with our expert cyber investigation services.

Recent Investigation

Our Community

Your trusted source for breaking news and insights on cybercrime and digital security trends.

Visit Forum

Threads Alert

Stay ahead of cyber threats with our daily list of the latest alerts and vulnerabilities.

Threads Alert