CyberCriminal.com

British American Tobacco PLC

We are investigating British American Tobacco PLC for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices. This includes potential violations such as impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

PARTIES INVOLVED : British American Tobacco PLC

ALLEGATIONS : Perjury, Fraud, Impersonation

INCIDENT DATE :  29 Jul 2024

INVESTIGATED BY : Ethan Katz

TOOLS USED : Lumen, FakeDMCA, SecurityTrails

CASE NO : 8135/A/2024

CRIME TYPE : Intellectual Property Scam

PUBLISHED ON : 23 Nov 2024

British American Tobacco PLC
Due Diligence
Get everything we know about British American Tobacco PLC in one downloadable PDF document
Is This About You?
We encourage you to share details of the actual perpetrators and get your story straight.

What We Are Investigating?

Our firm is launching a comprehensive investigation into British American Tobacco PLC over allegations that it has been suppressing critical reviews and unfavorable Google search results by fraudulently misusing DMCA takedown notices. These actions, if proven, could constitute serious legal violations—including impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

We conducted comprehensive analyses of fraudulent copyright takedown requests, meritless legal complaints, and other unlawful efforts to suppress public access to critical information. Our reporting sheds light on the prevalence and modus operandi of a structured censorship network, often funded and used by criminal enterprises, oligarchs and criminal entities seeking to manipulate public perception and bypass AML checks conducted by financial organisations.

The fake DMCA notices in this investigation appears to have been strategically deployed to remove negative content from Google search results illegally. Based on this pattern, we have reasonable grounds to infer that British American Tobacco PLC - or an entity acting at its behest - is directly or indirectly complicit in this cyber crime.

In most such cases, such ops are executed by rogue, fly-by-night 'Online Reputation Management' agencies acting on behalf of their clients. If evidence establishes that the subject knowingly benefited from or facilitated this scam, it may be deemed an 'accomplice' or an 'accessory' to the crime.

What are they trying to censor

British American Tobacco (BAT), one of the world’s largest tobacco companies, has faced numerous allegations and controversies over the years, many of which have significantly tarnished its reputation. These include accusations of unethical marketing practices, environmental harm, complicity in human rights abuses, and involvement in illicit trade. Below is a summary of the major allegations and red flags, along with an analysis of why BAT might seek to suppress such damaging information, even through illicit means.

Major Allegations and Adverse News

  1. Targeting Youth and Developing Markets: BAT has been repeatedly accused of marketing its products to young people and vulnerable populations in low- and middle-income countries. Internal documents have revealed strategies to attract younger smokers, including the use of flavored products and social media campaigns. This has drawn criticism from public health advocates and regulators.
  2. Environmental Damage: BAT has been linked to deforestation in countries like Brazil and Indonesia, where tobacco farming contributes to habitat destruction and biodiversity loss. Environmental groups have accused the company of failing to adequately address its supply chain’s impact on ecosystems.
  3. Complicity in Human Rights Abuses: Investigations have alleged that BAT sourced tobacco from farms in Zimbabwe that were seized during the controversial land reform program under Robert Mugabe’s regime. Critics argue that BAT benefited from exploitative labor practices and land confiscations.
  4. Illicit Trade and Smuggling: BAT has faced allegations of involvement in cigarette smuggling to evade taxes and boost profits. Documents have surfaced suggesting that the company may have facilitated the illegal trade of its products in markets like Colombia and South Africa.
  5. Lobbying Against Public Health Policies: BAT has been accused of undermining tobacco control measures, such as plain packaging and advertising bans, by lobbying governments and funding front groups that oppose regulation.
  6. Health Misinformation: The company has been criticized for promoting misleading information about the relative safety of its “reduced-risk” products, such as e-cigarettes and heated tobacco devices, without sufficient scientific evidence.

Reputational Harm and Motives for Suppression

These allegations harm BAT’s reputation by painting the company as prioritizing profits over public health, environmental sustainability, and ethical business practices. For a company already operating in a morally contentious industry, such negative publicity exacerbates public distrust and invites stricter regulatory scrutiny. This can lead to financial losses, legal challenges, and a decline in investor confidence.

In an era where information spreads rapidly online, BAT may view damaging stories as existential threats. The company could be motivated to remove or suppress such content to protect its brand image, maintain market share, and avoid litigation. In extreme cases, this might lead to unethical or illegal actions, such as hacking or cyberattacks, to silence critics or erase unfavorable information. For instance, if investigative journalists or whistleblowers expose new evidence of BAT’s involvement in illicit trade or human rights abuses, the company might resort to cybercrime to prevent the story from gaining traction.

Conclusion

The allegations against BAT highlight a pattern of behavior that conflicts with global efforts to promote public health, environmental sustainability, and ethical business practices. While the company denies many of these claims, the persistent negative publicity poses a significant risk to its reputation and bottom line. This creates a potential incentive for BAT to engage in cybercrime or other illicit activities to control the narrative, suppress damaging information, and shield itself from accountability. Such actions, if uncovered, would only deepen the controversy surrounding the company and reinforce the need for greater transparency and oversight in the tobacco industry.

  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/43425618
  • Jul 29, 2024
  • Giovanni Musco
  • https://buzztagz.com/
  • https://www.marketscreener.com/quote/stock/BRITISH-AMERICAN-TOBACCO–4001163/news/DTM-ME-FZE-LLC-acquired-B-A-T-Pars-Company-PJSC-from-British-American-Tobacco-p-l-c–38159167/

Evidence Box

Evidence and relevant screenshots related to our investigation

Targeted Content and Red Flags

marketscreener.com

DTM ME FZE LLC acquired B.A.T. Pars Company PJSC from British American Tobacco p.l.c..

  • Adverse News
Visit Link

finance.yahoo.com

British American Tobacco Plc to pay more than $635 million in North Korea sanctions case

  • Adverse News
Visit Link

finance.yahoo.com

British American Tobacco PLC to plead guilty in North Korea sanctions violations -

  • Adverse News
Visit Link

About the Author

The author is affiliated with TU Dresden and analyzes public databases such as Lumen Database and FakeDMCA.com to identify and expose online censorship. In his personal capacity, he and his team have been actively investigating and reporting on organized crime related to fraudulent copyright takedown schemes.

Additionally, his team provides advisory services to major law firms and is frequently consulted on matters pertaining to intellectual property law.

He can be reached at [email protected] directly.

Escalate This Case
Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.
Checkboxes

Learn All About Fake Copyright Takedown Scam

Or go directly to the feedback section and share your thoughts

How This Was Done

The fake DMCA notices we found always use the 'back-dated article' technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a 'true original' article and back-dates it, creating a 'fake original' article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original

What Happens Next?

Based on the feedback, information, and requests received from all relevant parties, our team will formally notify the affected party of the alleged infringement. Following a thorough review, we will submit a counter-notice to reinstate any link that has been removed by Google, in accordance with applicable legal provisions. Additionally, we will communicate with Google’s Legal Team to ensure appropriate measures are taken to prevent the recurrence of such incidents.

You are Never Alone in Your Fight.

Generate public support against the ones who wronged you!

Domain Check

Stop fraud before it happens with unbeatable speed, scale, depth, and breadth.

Recent Checks

Cyber Investigation

Uncover hidden digital threats and secure your assets with our expert cyber investigation services.

Recent Investigation

Our Community

Your trusted source for breaking news and insights on cybercrime and digital security trends.

Visit Forum

Threads Alert

Stay ahead of cyber threats with our daily list of the latest alerts and vulnerabilities.

Threads Alert