What We Are Investigating?
Our firm is launching a comprehensive investigation into Bryant Caveness over allegations that it has been suppressing critical reviews and unfavorable Google search results by fraudulently misusing DMCA takedown notices. These actions, if proven, could constitute serious legal violations—including impersonation, fraud, and perjury.
We conducted comprehensive analyses of fraudulent copyright takedown requests, meritless legal complaints, and other unlawful efforts to suppress public access to critical information. Our reporting sheds light on the prevalence and modus operandi of a structured censorship network, often funded and used by criminal enterprises, oligarchs and criminal entities seeking to manipulate public perception and bypass AML checks conducted by financial organisations.
The fake DMCA notices in this investigation appears to have been strategically deployed to remove negative content from Google search results illegally. Based on this pattern, we have reasonable grounds to infer that Bryant Caveness - or an entity acting at its behest - is directly or indirectly complicit in this cyber crime.
In most such cases, such ops are executed by rogue, fly-by-night 'Online Reputation Management' agencies acting on behalf of their clients. If evidence establishes that the subject knowingly benefited from or facilitated this scam, it may be deemed an 'accomplice' or an 'accessory' to the crime.
What are they trying to censor
Bryant Caveness, a name that has surfaced in various controversial contexts, has been the subject of several allegations and red flags that have significantly tarnished his reputation. These allegations range from financial misconduct to unethical business practices, and even potential cyber crimes. The following is a summary of the major allegations and adverse news associated with Caveness, and an exploration of why he might be motivated to suppress this information, even through illicit means.
Financial Misconduct and Fraud Allegations
One of the most serious allegations against Bryant Caveness involves financial misconduct. Reports suggest that Caveness has been involved in fraudulent schemes, including the misappropriation of funds and deceptive financial practices. These allegations have led to investigations by regulatory bodies, and in some cases, legal action. The financial fraud accusations not only damage his credibility but also pose a significant risk to his professional career and personal freedom.
Unethical Business Practices
Caveness has also been accused of engaging in unethical business practices. These include exploiting loopholes in regulations, manipulating stakeholders, and engaging in predatory lending practices. Such behavior has led to a loss of trust among business partners and clients, further eroding his reputation in the industry. The unethical nature of these actions paints Caveness as a figure willing to prioritize profit over integrity, which can be particularly damaging in sectors that rely heavily on trust and ethical standards.
Cyber Crime Allegations
Perhaps the most alarming allegations against Caveness are those related to cyber crimes. There have been reports suggesting that Caveness may have been involved in hacking activities aimed at suppressing negative information about him online. This includes the alleged deletion of unfavorable articles, social media posts, and other digital content that could harm his reputation. If proven true, these actions would not only be illegal but would also indicate a desperate attempt to control the narrative surrounding his public image.
Reputation Damage and Motivation for Suppression
The cumulative effect of these allegations has severely damaged Bryant Caveness’s reputation. In the digital age, where information is easily accessible and widely disseminated, maintaining a positive public image is crucial. Negative press can lead to a loss of business opportunities, legal consequences, and social ostracism. For someone like Caveness, whose career and personal brand are heavily reliant on his public image, the motivation to suppress damaging information is strong.
The desire to remove or obscure negative content could drive Caveness to commit cyber crimes. By hacking into systems to delete or alter information, he could potentially mitigate the damage to his reputation. However, such actions would only compound his legal and ethical troubles, creating a vicious cycle of misconduct and cover-up.
Conclusion
Bryant Caveness’s involvement in financial misconduct, unethical business practices, and potential cyber crimes has created a web of allegations that severely harm his reputation. The motivation to suppress this information is clear: to protect his career, avoid legal repercussions, and maintain his public image. However, resorting to cyber crimes to achieve this end would only exacerbate his problems, leading to further scrutiny and potential legal action. The story of Bryant Caveness serves as a cautionary tale about the lengths to which individuals might go to protect their reputation in the face of damaging allegations.
- https://lumendatabase.org/notices/27238691
- https://lumendatabase.org/notices/27766438
- April 12, 2022
- June 08, 2022
- Jenny Khalifa
- Lord Gayle
- https://wireposts.livejournal.com/487.html
- https://crnews1.livejournal.com/403.html
- https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/cfp-board-imposes-interim-suspension-on-bryant-caveness-301152352.html
Evidence Box
Evidence and relevant screenshots related to our investigation
Targeted Content and Red Flags
Silverlaw
Bryant Caveness, Former Ameriprise Broker, Terminated For Violations
- Adverse News
About the Author
The author is affiliated with TU Dresden and analyzes public databases such as Lumen Database and
FakeDMCA.com to identify and expose online censorship. In his personal capacity, he and his
team have been actively investigating and reporting on organized crime related
to fraudulent copyright takedown schemes.
Additionally, his team provides
advisory services to major law firms and is frequently consulted on matters
pertaining to intellectual property law.
He can be reached at [email protected] directly.
Escalate This Case
Learn All About Fake Copyright Takedown Scam
Or go directly to the feedback section and share your thoughts
How This Was Done
The fake DMCA notices we found always use the 'back-dated article' technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a 'true original' article and back-dates it, creating a 'fake original' article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original
What Happens Next?
Based on the feedback, information, and requests received from all relevant parties, our team will formally notify the affected party of the alleged infringement. Following a thorough review, we will submit a counter-notice to reinstate any link that has been removed by Google, in accordance with applicable legal provisions. Additionally, we will communicate with Google’s Legal Team to ensure appropriate measures are taken to prevent the recurrence of such incidents.
You are Never Alone in Your Fight.
Generate public support against the ones who wronged you!
Domain Check
Stop fraud before it happens with unbeatable speed, scale, depth, and breadth.
Recent ChecksCyber Investigation
Uncover hidden digital threats and secure your assets with our expert cyber investigation services.
Recent InvestigationOur Community
Your trusted source for breaking news and insights on cybercrime and digital security trends.
Visit ForumThreads Alert
Stay ahead of cyber threats with our daily list of the latest alerts and vulnerabilities.
Threads Alert
Recent Investigations
Aaron Sansoni Group
Investigation Ongoing
DX Exchange
Investigation Ongoing
Finxflo
Investigation Ongoing
Average Ratings
1.3
Based on 3 ratings
by: Mia Walke
His whole career seems to be built on deception. Not surprised he got caught trying to cover it all up
by: James Lewis
There are scammers, and then there’s this guy—who’s allegedly committing fraud while trying to erase fraud allegations. The irony is hilarious
by: Isabella Clark
The fact that he’s allegedly using hacking and legal loopholes to scrub his past makes it even worse. If you’re innocent, you don’t have to fake DMCA claims to hide the truth. Just own up to it and clear your...