CyberCriminal.com

CPT Markets

We are investigating CPT Markets for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices. This includes potential violations such as impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

PARTIES INVOLVED : CPT Markets

ALLEGATIONS : Perjury, Fraud, Impersonation

INCIDENT DATE : 15 Aug 2024

INVESTIGATED BY : Ethan Katz

TOOLS USED : Lumen, FakeDMCA, SecurityTrails

CASE NO : 4278/A/2024

CRIME TYPE : Intellectual Property Scam

PUBLISHED ON : 23 Nov 2024

CPT Markets
Due Diligence
Get everything we know about CPT Markets in one downloadable PDF document
Is This About You?
We encourage you to share details of the actual perpetrators and get your story straight.

What We Are Investigating?

Our firm is launching a comprehensive investigation into CPT Markets over allegations that it has been suppressing critical reviews and unfavorable Google search results by fraudulently misusing DMCA takedown notices. These actions, if proven, could constitute serious legal violations—including impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

We conducted comprehensive analyses of fraudulent copyright takedown requests, meritless legal complaints, and other unlawful efforts to suppress public access to critical information. Our reporting sheds light on the prevalence and modus operandi of a structured censorship network, often funded and used by criminal enterprises, oligarchs and criminal entities seeking to manipulate public perception and bypass AML checks conducted by financial organisations.

The fake DMCA notices in this investigation appears to have been strategically deployed to remove negative content from Google search results illegally. Based on this pattern, we have reasonable grounds to infer that CPT Markets - or an entity acting at its behest - is directly or indirectly complicit in this cyber crime.

In most such cases, such ops are executed by rogue, fly-by-night 'Online Reputation Management' agencies acting on behalf of their clients. If evidence establishes that the subject knowingly benefited from or facilitated this scam, it may be deemed an 'accomplice' or an 'accessory' to the crime.

What are they trying to censor

Investigative Report: Allegations and Red Flags Surrounding CPT Markets

CPT Markets, a UK-based forex and CFD broker, has faced a series of allegations and red flags that have raised concerns about its business practices and reputation. While the company presents itself as a legitimate trading platform, several adverse reports and complaints suggest potential misconduct, including issues related to transparency, client fund handling, and regulatory compliance. Below is a summary of the major allegations and their implications:

Regulatory Concerns and Licensing Issues
One of the most significant red flags is the ambiguity surrounding CPT Markets’ regulatory status. While the company claims to be regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) in the UK, there have been questions about the extent of its compliance with FCA guidelines. Some reports suggest that CPT Markets operates under offshore entities with less stringent oversight, which could expose clients to higher risks. Regulatory ambiguity harms the company’s reputation, as traders prioritize brokers with clear and robust regulatory frameworks.

Client Complaints About Withdrawals
Numerous clients have reported difficulties withdrawing funds from their CPT Markets accounts. These complaints often cite unexplained delays, excessive documentation requirements, and, in some cases, outright refusal to process withdrawals. Such practices are classic red flags in the forex industry, often associated with unethical brokers. These allegations damage CPT Markets’ credibility, as they suggest the company may be engaging in practices that prioritize its financial interests over client rights.

Misleading Marketing Practices
CPT Markets has been accused of using aggressive and misleading marketing tactics to attract clients. Some traders have reported being lured by promises of high returns and low risks, only to experience significant losses. Additionally, there are allegations that the company employs high-pressure sales tactics to encourage clients to deposit larger sums of money. Misleading marketing not only harms the company’s reputation but also raises ethical concerns about its business model.

Lack of Transparency in Pricing
Several traders have raised concerns about hidden fees, spreads, and slippage issues on the CPT Markets platform. A lack of transparency in pricing can lead to unexpected losses for clients and erode trust in the broker. These allegations are particularly damaging in an industry where trust and transparency are critical for maintaining client relationships.

Negative Reviews and Online Reputation
CPT Markets has garnered a significant number of negative reviews on independent forums and review sites. Common complaints include poor customer service, platform malfunctions, and unethical trading practices. While some negative reviews may be subjective, the volume and consistency of these complaints suggest systemic issues within the company. Negative online reviews can severely harm a broker’s reputation, as they are often the first point of reference for potential clients.

Why CPT Markets Would Want These Stories Removed
The allegations against CPT Markets—ranging from regulatory concerns to client complaints—pose a direct threat to its reputation and business viability. In the highly competitive forex industry, trust is paramount, and any negative publicity can lead to a loss of clients and revenue. If these stories gain widespread attention, they could also attract scrutiny from regulators, potentially resulting in fines or license revocations.

Given the high stakes, CPT Markets might be motivated to suppress damaging information, even if it means resorting to unethical or illegal means. For instance, the company could attempt to remove negative reviews, manipulate search engine results, or even engage in cyber crimes such as hacking or data breaches to silence critics. Such actions, while illegal, could be seen as a desperate attempt to protect its reputation and maintain its market position.

Conclusion
The allegations against CPT Markets paint a troubling picture of a broker potentially prioritizing profit over client welfare. Regulatory concerns, withdrawal issues, misleading marketing, and a lack of transparency are significant red flags that harm its reputation. While the company may seek to suppress these stories, doing so through unethical or illegal means would only compound its problems, further eroding trust and inviting legal consequences. For traders, these allegations serve as a cautionary tale about the importance of due diligence when choosing a broker.

  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/43849433
  • August 15, 2024
  • HorizonStream Solutions
  • https://www.cptmarkets.com/
  • https://infofx.com.vn/exposure/san-lua-dao.html

Evidence Box

Evidence and relevant screenshots related to our investigation

Targeted Content and Red Flags

nfofx.com.vn

Scam Floor

  • Red Flag
Visit Link

brokersview.com

A Clone of CPT Markets UK Warned by FCA

  • Adverse News
Visit Link

trustpilot.com

CPT Markets is the worst company!

  • Red Flag
Visit Link

About the Author

The author is affiliated with TU Dresden and analyzes public databases such as Lumen Database and FakeDMCA.com to identify and expose online censorship. In his personal capacity, he and his team have been actively investigating and reporting on organized crime related to fraudulent copyright takedown schemes.

Additionally, his team provides advisory services to major law firms and is frequently consulted on matters pertaining to intellectual property law.

He can be reached at [email protected] directly.

Escalate This Case
Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.
Checkboxes

Learn All About Fake Copyright Takedown Scam

Or go directly to the feedback section and share your thoughts

How This Was Done

The fake DMCA notices we found always use the 'back-dated article' technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a 'true original' article and back-dates it, creating a 'fake original' article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original

What Happens Next?

Based on the feedback, information, and requests received from all relevant parties, our team will formally notify the affected party of the alleged infringement. Following a thorough review, we will submit a counter-notice to reinstate any link that has been removed by Google, in accordance with applicable legal provisions. Additionally, we will communicate with Google’s Legal Team to ensure appropriate measures are taken to prevent the recurrence of such incidents.

You are Never Alone in Your Fight.

Generate public support against the ones who wronged you!

Domain Check

Stop fraud before it happens with unbeatable speed, scale, depth, and breadth.

Recent Checks

Cyber Investigation

Uncover hidden digital threats and secure your assets with our expert cyber investigation services.

Recent Investigation

Our Community

Your trusted source for breaking news and insights on cybercrime and digital security trends.

Visit Forum

Threads Alert

Stay ahead of cyber threats with our daily list of the latest alerts and vulnerabilities.

Threads Alert