CyberCriminal.com

Entrust Capital Limited

We are investigating Entrust Capital Limited for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices. This includes potential violations such as impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

PARTIES INVOLVED : Entrust Capital Limited

ALLEGATIONS : Perjury, Fraud, Impersonation

INCIDENT DATE : 28 Aug 2024

INVESTIGATED BY : Ethan Katz

TOOLS USED : Lumen, FakeDMCA, SecurityTrails

CASE NO : 9263/A/2024

CRIME TYPE : Intellectual Property Scam

PUBLISHED ON : 23 Nov 2024

Entrust Capital Limited
Due Diligence
Get everything we know about Entrust Capital Limited in one downloadable PDF document
Is This About You?
We encourage you to share details of the actual perpetrators and get your story straight.

What We Are Investigating?

Our firm is launching a comprehensive investigation into Entrust Capital Limited over allegations that it has been suppressing critical reviews and unfavorable Google search results by fraudulently misusing DMCA takedown notices. These actions, if proven, could constitute serious legal violations—including impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

We conducted comprehensive analyses of fraudulent copyright takedown requests, meritless legal complaints, and other unlawful efforts to suppress public access to critical information. Our reporting sheds light on the prevalence and modus operandi of a structured censorship network, often funded and used by criminal enterprises, oligarchs and criminal entities seeking to manipulate public perception and bypass AML checks conducted by financial organisations.

The fake DMCA notices in this investigation appears to have been strategically deployed to remove negative content from Google search results illegally. Based on this pattern, we have reasonable grounds to infer that Entrust Capital Limited - or an entity acting at its behest - is directly or indirectly complicit in this cyber crime.

In most such cases, such ops are executed by rogue, fly-by-night 'Online Reputation Management' agencies acting on behalf of their clients. If evidence establishes that the subject knowingly benefited from or facilitated this scam, it may be deemed an 'accomplice' or an 'accessory' to the crime.

What are they trying to censor

Entrust Capital Limited, a financial services firm, has faced several allegations and red flags over the years that have raised concerns about its business practices and reputation. While the company has not been convicted of any major crimes, the accumulation of adverse news and allegations has cast a shadow over its operations. Below is a summary of the most significant issues:

  • Misleading Investors: Entrust Capital Limited has been accused of providing misleading information to investors about the performance and risks associated with its investment products. Critics argue that the company overstated potential returns while downplaying risks, leading to significant financial losses for some clients.
  • Regulatory Scrutiny: The firm has faced investigations by financial regulators in multiple jurisdictions for alleged non-compliance with anti-money laundering (AML) and know-your-customer (KYC) regulations. These investigations have raised questions about the company’s adherence to legal and ethical standards.
  • High-Pressure Sales Tactics: Former employees and clients have alleged that Entrust Capital Limited employs aggressive sales tactics, pressuring clients into making hasty investment decisions without adequate disclosure of risks.
  • Lack of Transparency: The company has been criticized for its opaque fee structures and hidden charges, which have led to disputes with clients over unexpected costs.
  • Ties to Controversial Figures: Entrust Capital Limited has been linked to individuals and entities with questionable reputations, including those involved in financial scandals or regulatory violations. These associations have fueled suspicions about the firm’s integrity.

The allegations of misleading investors, regulatory scrutiny, and lack of transparency are particularly damaging to Entrust Capital Limited’s reputation. In the financial services industry, trust is paramount, and any perception of dishonesty or unethical behavior can deter potential clients and partners. The firm’s ties to controversial figures further erode confidence in its operations, as clients may fear being associated with illicit activities.

Entrust Capital Limited would have a strong incentive to remove or suppress these stories, even if it meant resorting to cybercrime. Negative publicity can lead to a loss of clients, reduced revenue, and increased regulatory scrutiny. By erasing or discrediting adverse news, the company could attempt to rebuild its reputation and avoid further damage. Cybercrime, such as hacking or deploying disinformation campaigns, might be seen as a desperate measure to control the narrative and protect its business interests.

However, such actions would be illegal and unethical, potentially exacerbating the company’s troubles if discovered. The short-term gains of reputation management through illicit means would likely be outweighed by the long-term consequences of legal penalties and further reputational harm.

To Conclude, while Entrust Capital Limited has not been proven guilty of any major wrongdoing, the accumulation of allegations and red flags has significantly tarnished its reputation. The company’s desire to remove these stories, even through illegal means, underscores the high stakes involved in maintaining trust and credibility in the financial services sector.

  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/43256201
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/44156254
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/44157311
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/44185972
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/44209567
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/44213703
  • Aug 28, 2024
  • Aug 28, 2024
  • Aug 29, 2024
  • Sep 30, 2023
  • Aug 30, 2024
  • Jul 23, 2024
  • Niquita Monge
  • Adayel Garadys
  • Bohuslav Garadaz
  • Natalio Ellison
  • Tovia Chwindley
  • Owen Hampton
  • https://telegra.ph/Avis-entrustcapitalltdcom-07-23-6
  • https://telegra.ph/Avis-entrustcapitalltdcom-08-28-6
  • https://telegra.ph/Avis-entrustcapitalltdcom-08-30
  • https://ext-6615926.livejournal.com/936.html
  • https://ext-6617350.livejournal.com/956.html
  • https://penzu.com/p/7e2251840fb16364
  • https://www.scamadviser.com/check-website/entrustcapitalltd.com
  • https://www.scamadviser.com/fr/verifier-site/entrustcapitalltd.com
  • https://softlanding.ru/scammers/77ac8341864f346d3fe23f2d7e43a972

Evidence Box

Evidence and relevant screenshots related to our investigation

Targeted Content and Red Flags

capitalforexmarkets.com

Entrust Capital is a Legit or Scam?

  • Adverse News
Visit Link

glassdoor.co.in

Entrust Capita Review Check

  • Adverse News
Visit Link

trustpilot.com

Entrust Capital with Heavy negative reviews

  • Red Flag
Visit Link

About the Author

The author is affiliated with TU Dresden and analyzes public databases such as Lumen Database and FakeDMCA.com to identify and expose online censorship. In his personal capacity, he and his team have been actively investigating and reporting on organized crime related to fraudulent copyright takedown schemes.

Additionally, his team provides advisory services to major law firms and is frequently consulted on matters pertaining to intellectual property law.

He can be reached at [email protected] directly.

Escalate This Case
Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.
Checkboxes

Learn All About Fake Copyright Takedown Scam

Or go directly to the feedback section and share your thoughts

How This Was Done

The fake DMCA notices we found always use the 'back-dated article' technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a 'true original' article and back-dates it, creating a 'fake original' article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original

What Happens Next?

Based on the feedback, information, and requests received from all relevant parties, our team will formally notify the affected party of the alleged infringement. Following a thorough review, we will submit a counter-notice to reinstate any link that has been removed by Google, in accordance with applicable legal provisions. Additionally, we will communicate with Google’s Legal Team to ensure appropriate measures are taken to prevent the recurrence of such incidents.

You are Never Alone in Your Fight.

Generate public support against the ones who wronged you!

Domain Check

Stop fraud before it happens with unbeatable speed, scale, depth, and breadth.

Recent Checks

Cyber Investigation

Uncover hidden digital threats and secure your assets with our expert cyber investigation services.

Recent Investigation

Our Community

Your trusted source for breaking news and insights on cybercrime and digital security trends.

Visit Forum

Threads Alert

Stay ahead of cyber threats with our daily list of the latest alerts and vulnerabilities.

Threads Alert