CyberCriminal.com

Hankotrade

We are investigating Hankotrade for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices. This includes potential violations such as impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

PARTIES INVOLVED : Hankotrade

ALLEGATIONS : Perjury, Fraud, Impersonation

INCIDENT DATE : 18 Aug 2024

INVESTIGATED BY : Ethan Katz

TOOLS USED : Lumen, FakeDMCA, SecurityTrails

CASE NO : 2802/A/2024

CRIME TYPE : Intellectual Property Scam

PUBLISHED ON : 22 Nov 2024

Hankotrade
Due Diligence
Get everything we know about Hankotrade in one downloadable PDF document
Is This About You?
We encourage you to share details of the actual perpetrators and get your story straight.

What We Are Investigating?

Our firm is launching a comprehensive investigation into Hankotrade over allegations that it has been suppressing critical reviews and unfavorable Google search results by fraudulently misusing DMCA takedown notices. These actions, if proven, could constitute serious legal violations—including impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

We conducted comprehensive analyses of fraudulent copyright takedown requests, meritless legal complaints, and other unlawful efforts to suppress public access to critical information. Our reporting sheds light on the prevalence and modus operandi of a structured censorship network, often funded and used by criminal enterprises, oligarchs and criminal entities seeking to manipulate public perception and bypass AML checks conducted by financial organisations.

The fake DMCA notices in this investigation appears to have been strategically deployed to remove negative content from Google search results illegally. Based on this pattern, we have reasonable grounds to infer that Hankotrade - or an entity acting at its behest - is directly or indirectly complicit in this cyber crime.

In most such cases, such ops are executed by rogue, fly-by-night 'Online Reputation Management' agencies acting on behalf of their clients. If evidence establishes that the subject knowingly benefited from or facilitated this scam, it may be deemed an 'accomplice' or an 'accessory' to the crime.

What are they trying to censor

Investigative Report: Allegations and Red Flags Surrounding Hankotrade

Hankotrade, an online forex and CFD trading platform, has faced a series of allegations and red flags that have raised concerns about its legitimacy and business practices. These issues range from accusations of being a scam and operating without proper regulation to complaints about unethical trading practices and poor customer service. Below is a summary of the major allegations, red flags, and adverse news surrounding Hankotrade, along with an analysis of how these stories harm its reputation and why the company might seek to suppress them, even through illicit means.

Major Allegations and Red Flags:

Accusations of Being a Scam:

– Numerous online reviews and complaints allege that Hankotrade is a scam, with users claiming they were unable to withdraw their funds or were pressured into depositing more money.

– Some users have reported that the platform uses manipulative tactics, such as freezing accounts or imposing unreasonable withdrawal conditions, to prevent them from accessing their funds.

Lack of Proper Regulation:

– Hankotrade has been criticized for operating without adequate regulatory oversight. While the company claims to be registered in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, this jurisdiction is known for its lax regulatory environment, raising concerns about the platform’s legitimacy.

– The lack of oversight from reputable financial regulators, such as the FCA (UK) or CySEC (Cyprus), has led to questions about the safety of users’ funds and the platform’s adherence to industry standards.

Unethical Trading Practices:

– There are allegations that Hankotrade engages in unethical practices, such as manipulating spreads and prices to ensure clients lose money. These accusations have led to suspicions that the platform operates as a “bucket shop,” profiting from client losses rather than legitimate trading activity.

– Some users have reported experiencing frequent slippage and requotes, which can negatively impact trading outcomes.

Poor Customer Service:

– Many users have complained about Hankotrade’s customer service, describing it as unresponsive and unhelpful. Issues such as delayed responses, lack of resolution to problems, and aggressive behavior from support staff have been frequently reported.

– The poor customer service has exacerbated the frustration of users who are already dealing with withdrawal issues or other problems.

Adverse Media Coverage:

– Hankotrade has been the subject of negative reviews and exposés on various financial forums, scam-reporting websites, and social media platforms. These reports have highlighted the platform’s alleged unethical practices and lack of regulation, further damaging its reputation.

Reputational Harm:

The allegations of being a scam and operating without proper regulation are particularly damaging to Hankotrade’s reputation. These accusations undermine trust in the platform, making it difficult to attract new clients and retain existing ones. The reports of unethical trading practices and poor customer service further erode confidence in the platform, leading to a loss of credibility in the competitive forex and CFD trading industry.

Motivation for Cyber Crime:

Given the severity of the allegations and the potential impact on its business, Hankotrade has a strong incentive to suppress negative information. Removing or discrediting stories that accuse the platform of being a scam or engaging in unethical practices could help restore its reputation and prevent further loss of clients. In extreme cases, this might lead to attempts to commit cyber crimes, such as:

Hacking into websites to remove or alter damaging reviews and articles.

Launching disinformation campaigns to discredit whistleblowers or critics.

Intimidating users who post negative reviews or complaints through cyber attacks or online harassment.

Such actions, while illegal, could be seen as a desperate measure to control the narrative and protect the company’s revenue stream.

Conclusion:

The allegations against Hankotrade paint a troubling picture of a platform accused of being a scam, operating without proper regulation, and engaging in unethical trading practices. These issues have significantly harmed the platform’s reputation, creating a motive for Hankotrade to take drastic measures, including potentially illegal actions, to suppress negative information and salvage its business. However, resorting to cyber crimes would only deepen the platform’s legal and reputational troubles, further eroding trust in an already controversial company.

  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/43911622
  •  Aug 18, 2024
  • LuminaSphere Systems
  • https://hankotrade.com/
  • https://www.myfxbook.com/reviews/brokers/hankotrade/1930486,1

Evidence Box

Evidence and relevant screenshots related to our investigation

Targeted Content and Red Flags

intelligenceline.com

Fraud The Dark Side of Hankotrade: Risks and Allegations Exposed

  • Red Flag
Visit Link

brokerchooser.com

Hankotrade safe?

  • Adverse News
Visit Link

netfactual.com

Hankotrade’s Fack-Check Report

  • Red Flag
Visit Link

About the Author

The author is affiliated with TU Dresden and analyzes public databases such as Lumen Database and FakeDMCA.com to identify and expose online censorship. In his personal capacity, he and his team have been actively investigating and reporting on organized crime related to fraudulent copyright takedown schemes.

Additionally, his team provides advisory services to major law firms and is frequently consulted on matters pertaining to intellectual property law.

He can be reached at [email protected] directly.

Escalate This Case
Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.
Checkboxes

Learn All About Fake Copyright Takedown Scam

Or go directly to the feedback section and share your thoughts

How This Was Done

The fake DMCA notices we found always use the 'back-dated article' technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a 'true original' article and back-dates it, creating a 'fake original' article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original

What Happens Next?

Based on the feedback, information, and requests received from all relevant parties, our team will formally notify the affected party of the alleged infringement. Following a thorough review, we will submit a counter-notice to reinstate any link that has been removed by Google, in accordance with applicable legal provisions. Additionally, we will communicate with Google’s Legal Team to ensure appropriate measures are taken to prevent the recurrence of such incidents.

You are Never Alone in Your Fight.

Generate public support against the ones who wronged you!

Domain Check

Stop fraud before it happens with unbeatable speed, scale, depth, and breadth.

Recent Checks

Cyber Investigation

Uncover hidden digital threats and secure your assets with our expert cyber investigation services.

Recent Investigation

Our Community

Your trusted source for breaking news and insights on cybercrime and digital security trends.

Visit Forum

Threads Alert

Stay ahead of cyber threats with our daily list of the latest alerts and vulnerabilities.

Threads Alert