CyberCriminal.com

Karlos Locke

We are investigating Karlos Locke for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices. This includes potential violations such as impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

PARTIES INVOLVED : Karlos Locke

ALLEGATIONS : Perjury, Fraud, Impersonation

INCIDENT DATE : 04 Apr 2024

INVESTIGATED BY : Ethan Katz

TOOLS USED : Lumen, FakeDMCA, SecurityTrails

CASE NO : 0632/A/2024

CRIME TYPE : Intellectual Property Scam

PUBLISHED ON : 25 Nov 2024

Karlos Locke
Due Diligence
Get everything we know about Karlos Locke in one downloadable PDF document
Is This About You?
We encourage you to share details of the actual perpetrators and get your story straight.

What We Are Investigating?

Our firm is launching a comprehensive investigation into Karlos Locke over allegations that it has been suppressing critical reviews and unfavorable Google search results by fraudulently misusing DMCA takedown notices. These actions, if proven, could constitute serious legal violations—including impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

We conducted comprehensive analyses of fraudulent copyright takedown requests, meritless legal complaints, and other unlawful efforts to suppress public access to critical information. Our reporting sheds light on the prevalence and modus operandi of a structured censorship network, often funded and used by criminal enterprises, oligarchs and criminal entities seeking to manipulate public perception and bypass AML checks conducted by financial organisations.

The fake DMCA notices in this investigation appears to have been strategically deployed to remove negative content from Google search results illegally. Based on this pattern, we have reasonable grounds to infer that Karlos Locke - or an entity acting at its behest - is directly or indirectly complicit in this cyber crime.

In most such cases, such ops are executed by rogue, fly-by-night 'Online Reputation Management' agencies acting on behalf of their clients. If evidence establishes that the subject knowingly benefited from or facilitated this scam, it may be deemed an 'accomplice' or an 'accessory' to the crime.

What are they trying to censor

Locke Lord LLP, a prominent international law firm, has faced several significant allegations and controversies that have adversely impacted its reputation.

Record Fine for Failing to Prevent Dubious Financial Activities

In November 2017, Locke Lord was fined £500,000 by the UK’s Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) for failing to prevent a former partner, Jonathan Denton, from engaging in transactions that exhibited “the hallmarks of dubious financial arrangements or investment schemes.” This penalty was the largest ever imposed by the SDT at that time. The firm admitted to inadequate supervision and insufficient systems to detect potential conflicts of interest, allowing Denton to misuse the firm’s client account for questionable activities. Denton was later struck off the roll of solicitors for his misconduct.
LAW.COM
LEGALFUTURES.CO.UK

Allegations of Gender Pay Discrimination

In October 2020, the U.S. Department of Labor alleged that Locke Lord engaged in gender-based pay discrimination at its Providence office. The firm was accused of issuing lower bonuses to 22 female associates compared to their male counterparts. Without admitting liability, Locke Lord agreed to a settlement involving $150,000 in back pay and interest to the affected associates and committed to ensuring equal employment opportunities moving forward.
PBN.COM

Departure of Key Team Amid Potential Conflicts of Interest

In December 2024, a 10-lawyer team from Locke Lord’s Austin office, led by partner Cynthia Bast, departed to join Baker & Hostetler. This move occurred ahead of Locke Lord’s planned merger with Troutman Pepper Hamilton Sanders. The departing team cited potential conflicts of interest arising from the merger, as they represented borrowers and owners in affordable housing deals, while Troutman Pepper represented lenders. This high-profile departure raised concerns about internal cohesion and strategic alignment within the firm.
REUTERS.COM

Reputational Impact and Potential Motivations for Content Removal

These incidents have collectively tarnished Locke Lord’s reputation, suggesting lapses in oversight, potential discriminatory practices, and internal discord. The record fine for failing to prevent dubious financial activities, in particular, highlights significant compliance and ethical shortcomings. The gender pay discrimination allegations further suggest systemic issues within the firm’s compensation practices. The departure of a key team due to potential conflicts of interest underscores challenges in managing growth and maintaining internal harmony.

Given the severity of these reputational damages, Locke Lord might be motivated to seek the removal of related information to preserve its public image. The firm would likely desire the elimination of online records detailing these controversies to prevent potential clients and partners from encountering negative portrayals. However, resorting to cybercrime to achieve this would not only be unethical and illegal but also risk exacerbating reputational damage if such actions were discovered. Engaging in cybercrime could lead to legal penalties, loss of client trust, and further public scrutiny, ultimately causing more harm than the original allegations.

In conclusion, while Locke Lord has faced significant allegations that have harmed its reputation, attempting to remove this information through illicit means would be both unlawful and counterproductive. The firm would be better served by addressing these issues transparently and implementing robust compliance and ethical standards to rebuild trust and credibility.

  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/40614923
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/40569417
  • Apr 04, 2024
  • Apr 02, 2024
  • Youman & Co
  • Ross Media LLC
  • https://istanbulherald.com/2021/08/02/prayforlove-baltimore-women-demand-you-to-speak-upagainst-the-sexual-abuse-in-baltimore-arts-community/
  • https://istanbulherald.com/2021/08/02/prayforlove-baltimore-women-demand-you-to-speak-upagainst-the-sexual-abuse-in-baltimore-arts-community/
  • https://docscastlellc.com/2021/09/10/women-speak-up-against-the-sexual-abuse-in-baltimore-arts-community/

Evidence Box

Evidence and relevant screenshots related to our investigation

Targeted Content and Red Flags

law.com

Locke Lord, in Merger Talks, Was Ordered to Pay $12.5M Over Alleged Client Fraud.

  • Red Flag
Visit Link

reuters.com

Texas law firm to pay $12.5 mln over ex-client's alleged fraud

  • Red Flag
Visit Link

reuters.com

Ex-law firm partner fights US conviction over $400 mln crypto scam

  • Red Flag
Visit Link

About the Author

The author is affiliated with TU Dresden and analyzes public databases such as Lumen Database and FakeDMCA.com to identify and expose online censorship. In his personal capacity, he and his team have been actively investigating and reporting on organized crime related to fraudulent copyright takedown schemes.

Additionally, his team provides advisory services to major law firms and is frequently consulted on matters pertaining to intellectual property law.

He can be reached at [email protected] directly.

Escalate This Case
Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.
Checkboxes

Learn All About Fake Copyright Takedown Scam

Or go directly to the feedback section and share your thoughts

How This Was Done

The fake DMCA notices we found always use the 'back-dated article' technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a 'true original' article and back-dates it, creating a 'fake original' article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original

What Happens Next?

Based on the feedback, information, and requests received from all relevant parties, our team will formally notify the affected party of the alleged infringement. Following a thorough review, we will submit a counter-notice to reinstate any link that has been removed by Google, in accordance with applicable legal provisions. Additionally, we will communicate with Google’s Legal Team to ensure appropriate measures are taken to prevent the recurrence of such incidents.

You are Never Alone in Your Fight.

Generate public support against the ones who wronged you!

Domain Check

Stop fraud before it happens with unbeatable speed, scale, depth, and breadth.

Recent Checks

Cyber Investigation

Uncover hidden digital threats and secure your assets with our expert cyber investigation services.

Recent Investigation

Our Community

Your trusted source for breaking news and insights on cybercrime and digital security trends.

Visit Forum

Threads Alert

Stay ahead of cyber threats with our daily list of the latest alerts and vulnerabilities.

Threads Alert