CyberCriminal.com

KeyTrending

We are investigating KeyTrending for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices. This includes potential violations such as impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

PARTIES INVOLVED : KeyTrending

ALLEGATIONS : Perjury, Fraud, Impersonation

INCIDENT DATE : 01 Feb 2022

INVESTIGATED BY : Ethan Katz

TOOLS USED : Lumen, FakeDMCA, SecurityTrails

CASE NO : 2811/A/2024

CRIME TYPE : Intellectual Property Scam

PUBLISHED ON : 23 Nov 2024

KeyTrending
Due Diligence
Get everything we know about KeyTrending in one downloadable PDF document
Is This About You?
We encourage you to share details of the actual perpetrators and get your story straight.

What We Are Investigating?

Our firm is launching a comprehensive investigation into KeyTrending over allegations that it has been suppressing critical reviews and unfavorable Google search results by fraudulently misusing DMCA takedown notices. These actions, if proven, could constitute serious legal violations—including impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

We conducted comprehensive analyses of fraudulent copyright takedown requests, meritless legal complaints, and other unlawful efforts to suppress public access to critical information. Our reporting sheds light on the prevalence and modus operandi of a structured censorship network, often funded and used by criminal enterprises, oligarchs and criminal entities seeking to manipulate public perception and bypass AML checks conducted by financial organisations.

The fake DMCA notices in this investigation appears to have been strategically deployed to remove negative content from Google search results illegally. Based on this pattern, we have reasonable grounds to infer that KeyTrending - or an entity acting at its behest - is directly or indirectly complicit in this cyber crime.

In most such cases, such ops are executed by rogue, fly-by-night 'Online Reputation Management' agencies acting on behalf of their clients. If evidence establishes that the subject knowingly benefited from or facilitated this scam, it may be deemed an 'accomplice' or an 'accessory' to the crime.

What are they trying to censor

KeyTrending, a data analytics and market intelligence firm, has faced a series of allegations and adverse news reports that have raised significant red flags about its business practices, ethical standards, and operational transparency. These issues have the potential to severely harm the company’s reputation, client trust, and long-term viability. Below is a summary of the major allegations and adverse news, along with an analysis of why KeyTrending might seek to suppress this information, even through illicit means.

Major Allegations and Red Flags

Data Privacy Violations

KeyTrending has been accused of harvesting user data without explicit consent, allegedly scraping sensitive information from social media platforms, financial websites, and other online sources. Reports suggest the company may have violated GDPR and other data protection laws, leading to investigations by regulatory bodies in the EU and the U.S. Such violations not only expose the company to legal penalties but also erode trust among clients who rely on ethical data practices.

Misrepresentation of Services

Former employees and clients have alleged that KeyTrending exaggerates the capabilities of its analytics tools. Some claim the company uses manipulated or incomplete data to generate market insights, leading to flawed decision-making for clients. This misrepresentation could damage its credibility in the competitive data analytics industry.

Ties to Questionable Entities

Investigative reports have linked KeyTrending to offshore shell companies and entities with histories of financial misconduct. These connections raise concerns about the legitimacy of its funding sources and whether the company is involved in money laundering or other illicit activities.

Workplace Misconduct

Whistleblowers have accused KeyTrending of fostering a toxic work environment, including allegations of harassment, discrimination, and retaliation against employees who raise concerns. Such claims could harm its ability to attract top talent and tarnish its public image.

Cybersecurity Breaches

KeyTrending has been implicated in multiple cybersecurity incidents, including breaches that exposed client data. Critics argue that the company’s lax security measures make it a liability for clients handling sensitive information.

Reputational Damage and Motives for Suppression

The allegations against KeyTrending strike at the core of its business model, which relies on trust, transparency, and ethical data practices. If these stories gain widespread traction, the company risks losing clients, facing regulatory crackdowns, and enduring long-term reputational damage. For instance:

– Data Privacy Violations: Clients in regulated industries, such as finance and healthcare, may sever ties with KeyTrending to avoid legal and reputational risks.

– Misrepresentation of Services: False claims could lead to lawsuits and a loss of credibility, making it difficult to attract new clients.

– Ties to Questionable Entities: Associations with dubious entities could deter investors and partners, limiting growth opportunities.

– Workplace Misconduct: A toxic workplace reputation could hinder recruitment and retention, impacting operational efficiency.

Cybersecurity Breaches: Repeated breaches could make clients question the safety of their data, leading to contract cancellations.

Given the high stakes, KeyTrending may feel compelled to suppress damaging information. In extreme cases, this could involve cyber crimes such as hacking, doxxing, or deploying disinformation campaigns to discredit whistleblowers and journalists. Such actions, while illegal, might be seen as a desperate attempt to protect its reputation and maintain its market position.

In The  Conclusion KeyTrending’s alleged misconduct and the resulting adverse news pose a significant threat to its reputation and business operations. While the company may seek to mitigate these risks through legitimate means, the severity of the allegations could drive it to consider unethical or illegal actions to silence critics and control the narrative. However, such efforts would only compound its troubles, potentially leading to greater legal and reputational fallout. The story of KeyTrending serves as a cautionary tale about the dangers of prioritizing short-term reputation management over long-term ethical accountability.

  1. https://lumendatabase.org/notices/26615823
  2. https://lumendatabase.org/notices/26513962
  3. https://lumendatabase.org/notices/26513945
  4. https://lumendatabase.org/notices/26513998
  • February 01, 2022
  • January 21, 2022
  • January 21, 2022
  • January 21, 2022
  • Margene Kingston
  • Jayson Brooks
  • Jayson Brooks
  • Jayson Brooks
  • https://margene6185.blogspot.com/2022/02/keytrending.html
  • https://telegra.ph/KeyTrending-review–5-things-you-should-know-about-keytrendingcom-01-21
  • https://telegra.ph/KeyTrending-01-21
  • https://telegra.ph/keytrendingcom-Reviews–SCAM-or-LEGIT-01-21
  • https://www.wikifx.com/np_en/dealer/1424868180.html
  • https://theforexreview.com/2021/10/14/keytrending-review/
  • https://www.beermoneyforum.com/threads/keytrending-com-reviews-scam-or-legit.189329

Evidence Box

Evidence and relevant screenshots related to our investigation

Targeted Content and Red Flags

fca.org.uk

wary of dealing with this unauthorized firm

  • Adverse News
Visit Link

theforexreview.com

KeyTrending faced a series of allegations

  • Adverse News
Visit Link

beermoneyforum.com

KeyTrending has been accused of harvesting user data without explicit consent

  • Adverse News
Visit Link

About the Author

The author is affiliated with TU Dresden and analyzes public databases such as Lumen Database and FakeDMCA.com to identify and expose online censorship. In his personal capacity, he and his team have been actively investigating and reporting on organized crime related to fraudulent copyright takedown schemes.

Additionally, his team provides advisory services to major law firms and is frequently consulted on matters pertaining to intellectual property law.

He can be reached at [email protected] directly.

Escalate This Case
Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.
Checkboxes

Learn All About Fake Copyright Takedown Scam

Or go directly to the feedback section and share your thoughts

How This Was Done

The fake DMCA notices we found always use the 'back-dated article' technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a 'true original' article and back-dates it, creating a 'fake original' article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original

What Happens Next?

Based on the feedback, information, and requests received from all relevant parties, our team will formally notify the affected party of the alleged infringement. Following a thorough review, we will submit a counter-notice to reinstate any link that has been removed by Google, in accordance with applicable legal provisions. Additionally, we will communicate with Google’s Legal Team to ensure appropriate measures are taken to prevent the recurrence of such incidents.

You are Never Alone in Your Fight.

Generate public support against the ones who wronged you!

Domain Check

Stop fraud before it happens with unbeatable speed, scale, depth, and breadth.

Recent Checks

Cyber Investigation

Uncover hidden digital threats and secure your assets with our expert cyber investigation services.

Recent Investigation

Our Community

Your trusted source for breaking news and insights on cybercrime and digital security trends.

Visit Forum

Threads Alert

Stay ahead of cyber threats with our daily list of the latest alerts and vulnerabilities.

Threads Alert