Lawrence Jenkins

Lawrence Jenkins, a name that has surfaced in multiple legal documents and news reports, has been associated with various allegations of financial misconduct over the years. These incidents raise significant concerns for potential investors and warrant attention from regulatory authorities.​

Securities Fraud Allegations

In April 2007, the Utah Division of Securities and the Utah Attorney General’s Office filed securities fraud charges against Lawrence Jenkins of Draper and Lamar N. Jensen of Salt Lake City. The charges stemmed from an alleged scheme in which the two men approached a Utah County real estate investment firm, promising a 100 percent return within one week on a $500,000 investment through medium-term bank notes. Additionally, they offered a $50 million line of credit with interest no greater than 6 percent, among other perks. The investment firm transferred the funds but reportedly did not receive any return on their investment.

Legal Entanglements and Financial Misconduct

Further complicating Jenkins’s financial history are legal disputes such as Bayne v. Jenkins. In this case, multiple plaintiffs contested promissory notes related to a securities sale. While the jury sided with Jenkins, ruling in his favor regarding the plaintiffs’ claims and awarding him $140,000 on his counterclaim, the case underscores the contentious nature of his financial dealings. ​

Efforts to Suppress Negative Information

Individuals with histories of financial misconduct often seek to suppress adverse media to protect their reputations and maintain access to investment opportunities. While specific instances of Jenkins attempting to censor information are not detailed in the available sources, it is common for individuals facing such allegations to pursue legal action, issue cease-and-desist letters, or engage in online reputation management strategies to remove or bury unfavorable content.​

Conclusion

The pattern of allegations and legal disputes associated with Lawrence Jenkins raises significant red flags for potential investors. While everyone is entitled to defend their reputation, the consistent emergence of financial misconduct claims suggests a need for caution. Investors are advised to conduct thorough due diligence and remain vigilant when considering opportunities linked to individuals with such histories.