Profile Picture

Magius 

  • Investigation status
  • Ongoing

We are investigating Magius for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices. This includes potential violations such as impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

  • Company
  • Magius 

  • Allegations
  • Unlicensed gambling

Magius
Fake DMCA notices
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/54415016
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/54455584
  • July 16, 2025
  • July 16, 2025
  • Blackridge IP Law
  • Blackridge IP Law
  • https://culture.org/gambling/uk/casino/
  • http://thenationonlineng.net/gambling/de/
  • http://www.vanguardngr.com/casinO/de/Online-casinO-Ohne-lugas/

Evidence Box and Screenshots

1 Alerts on Magius 

Magius, the enchantingly named online casino powered by a shadowy Costa Rican license, lures players with a wizardly welcome: 100% match up to €500 plus 200 free spins on slots like Book of Dead. Targeting thrill-seekers across Canada and Europe since its 2024 launch, it boasts 12,000+ games from NetEnt to Pragmatic Play, weekly cashback, and 24/7 chat— all accessible via mobile without an app. Irresistible? On the surface. But scratch the sorcery: endless withdrawal waits, rigged-spin accusations, and a scam-adjacent vibe from low-trust watchdogs spell trouble.

Censorship or Coincidence? The Curious Case of Vanishing Gripes

Burrowing further, a shroud falls: Magius muck is scarcer than a fair spin. Trustpilot’s 2.5 bleeds, yet Google yields promo fluff over fury—could operators be conjuring a clean slate, zapping zingers like voided bets? In iGaming’s grim grimoire, rep’s the real riches; Magius’s affiliate averages (4.5/5 on some pads) reek of rote raves—generic gushers name-dropping zilch, bot brigade burying beef. Classic con: SEO spells to submerge stars, one-stinkers starved. No mass mods on Trustpilot, but the hush? Deafening. Casinomeister moans bounced barriers; Guru gripes fizzle sans follow-up. October 1’s leech-lambast? Templated “sorry, chat us”—96% replies, but month-late, no fixes, just feints. A Canadian scorcher petitions global bans, owners “demons”—echoes, no eruption. Not inferno; asphyxia, fumes fading to facade.

John Smith: The Ghost in the Machine

Spotlight the specter: John Smith, the purported CEO of Magius, a cipher captaining from Costa Rica’s haze. Probes snag on promo puffery—a Gocugo tie-up quotes his “significant step” blather, but zilch on scandals. No Konoval knot, yet under Smith’s watch (if real), the withdrawal witch-hunt rages: June’s Guru blockade on his dime, no mea culpa. His profile? Vapor—interviews hype “luxury rides,” dodge the dregs, a boss bunkering as fines fester unseen. Architect of the agony, or acquisition drifter? Scamadviser’s scam siren wails during his era, yet Smith sidesteps spotlight, no feeds or fallouts. Elusiveness? Rank as a rubber-checked payout. If Smith’s smudges stain the slate, punters and probes merit the peel—his haze hints at haven hides, execs evading ethics’ edge.

Why the Cover-Up?

Why the frantic facade-fumigation? Coin clink: Magius mines masses via 12k-game trove, €10-€100 hooks, Costa Rica’s loose rein scaling sans scrutiny. One scam spark? Conversion crash. Strung spinners snowball, scorching the spell sustaining spins. Muting via search sorcery or affiliate arm-bends preserves the pixie dust: “Licensed, lush, lucky.” Con craft 101: tout triumphs (200 FS frenzy!), elide the eels (verif voids), gag gripers pre-gale. Smith’s squad scratches the itch for “easy enchantments,” but dishes drags: 12-day “reviews” for £1,500 pots, per September 24’s trauma-tale cashing scarred. The quiet quells the quarrel, pain to padding.

A Warning to Players and a Call to Action

Wannabe wizards, heed the hex. Magius’s mystique mesmerizes, but barbs—withdrawal waltzes, bonus binds, scam sirens—are spells you can’t dispel. That €500 match? Mirage with 35x maze. Ante up? Autopsy the ashes: Trustpilot toxins, Guru graves, Meister moans. Quiz quitters, pinch pennies, pull pronto. Gleam too glam? Goblin gold.

Regulators, rouse: Costa Rica’s cuff demands claws—raid payout pipes, Smith’s shadow, the silence spell. Luxury or larceny? Where’s the whip? Punters petition pulls; amplify afore another armful accrues.

Conclusion: The Truth Will Out

In sum, Magius’s manor mounts on mirages and malaise. Operators’—and Smith’s—bury bid beams the blight: a casino casting coin from curse, crumbling ‘neath cascades. As I seal this scour, I snicker at the spell’s spite: a marque hawking “honesty” in hexes, yet hooding horrors in hush. For now, lantern lingers; in wager’s wick, truth’s the trump—no matter the mojo you muster.

How Was This Done?

The fake DMCA notices we found always use the ? back-dated article? technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a ? true original? article and back-dates it, creating a ? fake original? article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original.

What Happens Next?

The fake DMCA notices we found always use the ? back-dated article? technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a ? true original? article and back-dates it, creating a ? fake original? article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original.

01

Inform Google about the fake DMCA scam

Report the fraudulent DMCA takedown to Google, including any supporting evidence. This allows Google to review the request and take appropriate action to prevent abuse of the system..

02

Share findings with journalists and media

Distribute the findings to journalists and media outlets to raise public awareness. Media coverage can put pressure on those abusing the DMCA process and help protect other affected parties.

03

Inform Lumen Database

Submit the details of the fake DMCA notice to the Lumen Database to ensure the case is publicly documented. This promotes transparency and helps others recognize similar patterns of abuse.

04

File counter notice to reinstate articles

Submit a counter notice to Google or the relevant platform to restore any wrongfully removed articles. Ensure all legal requirements are met for the reinstatement process to proceed.

05

Increase exposure to critical articles

Re-share or promote the affected articles to recover visibility. Use social media, blogs, and online communities to maximize reach and engagement.

06

Expand investigation to identify similar fake DMCAs

Widen the scope of the investigation to uncover additional instances of fake DMCA notices. Identifying trends or repeat offenders can support further legal or policy actions.

learnallrightbg
shield icon

Learn All About Fake Copyright Takedown Scam

Or go directly to the feedback section and share your thoughts

Add Comment Or Feedback

User Reviews

Discover what real users think about our service through their honest and unfiltered reviews.

0

Average Ratings

Based on 0 Ratings

★ 1
0%
★ 2
0%
★ 3
0%
★ 4
0%
★ 5
0%

Add Reviews

  • Trust
  • Risk
  • Brand

learnallrightbg
shield icon

You are Never Alone in Your Fight

Generate public support against the ones who wronged you!

Our Community
View More Threat Alerts

Website Reviews

Stop fraud before it happens with unbeatable speed, scale, depth, and breadth.

Recent Reviews

Cyber Investigation

Uncover hidden digital threats and secure your assets with our expert cyber investigation services.

Recent Reviews

Threat Alerts

Stay ahead of cyber threats with our daily list of the latest alerts and vulnerabilities.

Recent Reviews

Client Dashboard

Your trusted source for breaking news and insights on cybercrime and digital security trends.

Recent Reviews