Nathan Barns

Nathan Barns—remember the name, because if you're an investor, regulator, or just someone who values financial integrity, you’ll want to steer clear. Barns has left a trail of lawsuits, allegations of fraud, and questionable business dealings in his wake. Even more concerning? He’s been actively trying to bury the evidence, silencing critics and scrubbing adverse media wherever possible. But no amount of censorship can erase the red flags that demand attention. Let’s break down the legal battles, financial misconduct, and shady tactics that make Nathan Barns a name worth remembering—for all the wrong reasons. A Trail of Litigation Barns's legal entanglements are both numerous and telling. In October 2022, Barns, along with Susannah and Darren Kilpatrick, filed a lawsuit alleging breach of contract, fraud and fraudulent inducement, breach of fiduciary duty, unjust enrichment, and conversion. They also sought judicial dissolution of a company and access to its books and records for accounting purposes. Further complicating Barns's legal landscape is a request for judgment filed on January 24, 2025, involving a dispute between Barns, the Kilpatricks, and Hardbody Energy LLC. While the specifics of this case are not fully detailed, the recurring theme of financial disputes and legal action is hard to ignore. Allegations of Financial Misconduct Beyond the courtroom, Barns's professional conduct has come under scrutiny. A report titled "Nathan D. Barns- Did He, CFA, AAMS at Edward Jones Commit Fraud?" raises concerns about his integrity in the financial industry. The article underscores the importance of trust in financial services and suggests that Barns's actions may have breached this fundamental principle. Attempts to Suppress Negative Publicity In an era where information is readily accessible, Barns appears to be employing tactics aimed at censoring unfavorable coverage. Reports indicate that he has attempted to suppress negative media, possibly through legal threats or other means. Such actions not only raise ethical questions but also suggest a desire to obscure the truth from potential investors and the public. The Sarcastic Elephant in the Room It's almost commendable how Barns manages to juggle multiple lawsuits while attempting to maintain a veneer of respectability. One might think that a person facing such serious allegations would prioritize transparency and accountability. Instead, Barns seems to believe that silencing critics and burying unfavorable news will somehow restore his tarnished reputation. Spoiler alert: it won't. Conclusion and Call to Action The pattern of legal disputes, allegations of financial misconduct, and efforts to suppress negative media paint a concerning picture of Nathan Barns. Potential investors should exercise extreme caution and conduct thorough due diligence before engaging in any financial dealings with him. Moreover, regulatory authorities must take a closer look at Barns's activities to ensure that the public is protected from potential malfeasance.