Robby Blanchard at Commission Hero

A summary of what happened?

Robby Blanchard is the creator of Commission Hero, a popular online course designed to teach people how to succeed in affiliate marketing, primarily by using Facebook ads. As a top affiliate on the ClickBank platform, Blanchard’s course has gained attention for its potential to generate significant income through affiliate commissions. However, the course has also attracted criticism and concerns from users.

Here are three major concerns and complaints commonly raised against Robby Blanchard and his Commission Hero program:

1. High Costs and Hidden Expenses: While the initial cost of the course is approximately $997, students often find that there are additional costs involved, including monthly fees for tools like ClickFunnels, Aweber, and ClickMagick, as well as significant investments in Facebook ads. This can quickly add up to several thousand dollars, making it an expensive venture, especially for beginners. Many users have complained about the high financial barrier to seeing meaningful success.
2. Dependency on Paid Ads: The course relies heavily on paid Facebook ads to drive traffic, which can be risky for users without substantial marketing budgets. As Facebook is known for frequently shutting down ad accounts, users can face issues with ad account bans, requiring them to create multiple accounts. The heavy reliance on a single traffic source (Facebook) also limits diversification, making the system vulnerable to changes in platform policies.
3. Refund Policy Complaints: Commission Hero’s refund policy has been a point of contention for many users. The policy requires participants to wait 12 months before they can request a refund, and even then, they must provide proof that they actively implemented the course strategies without success. This restrictive refund process has left some students feeling frustrated and stuck with a program they found unworkable.

Despite these issues, some students have reported success with the program, but the overall experience can vary significantly based on individual effort, financial investment, and market conditions. If you’re considering Commission Hero, it’s essential to weigh these factors carefully.

Analyzing the Fake Copyright Notice(s)

Our team collects and analyses fraudulent copyright takedown requests, legal complaints, and other efforts to remove critical information from the internet. Through our investigative reporting, we examine the prevalence and operation of an organized censorship industry, predominantly funded by criminal entities, oligarchs, and disreputable businesses or individuals. Our findings allow internet users to gain insight into these censorship schemes’ sources, methods, and underlying objectives.

What was Robby Blanchard at Commission Hero trying to hide?

Robby Blanchard at Commission Hero‘s attempts to hide unfavourable content through the misuse of copyright notices while allegedly engaging in perjury present serious legal concerns. These actions suggest a calculated attempt to manipulate legal systems to suppress free speech, a fundamental violation of copyright law principles and an abuse of legal processes. The use of such tactics not only undermines the integrity of copyright protection but also potentially constitutes perjury, further entangling Robby Blanchard at Commission Hero in legal accountability. Let’s examine the information Robby Blanchard at Commission Hero may be trying to remove from the internet –

Robby Blanchard, the creator of Commission Hero, has built a reputation as a leading figure in the world of affiliate marketing, especially due to his success on the ClickBank platform. However, despite some users’ success stories, Blanchard’s program has been met with several criticisms and complaints, both about its content and its financial implications.

1. High Initial Course Cost

One of the most common complaints is the $997 upfront fee for the course. Many users feel that for what they are getting, the price is too high, particularly when considering that the course largely revolves around affiliate marketing, which many other programs offer for a fraction of the price. There is also a payment plan option, but it still ends up being more expensive than the one-time payment.

2. Hidden Expenses

Beyond the initial fee, users have reported the need for additional investments in tools such as ClickFunnels ($97/month), Aweber ($29/month), and ClickMagick ($27/month), as well as a hefty budget for Facebook ads, which are integral to the course’s strategy. According to reviews, Robby Blanchard encourages participants to spend at least $300-$600 per month on ads, a figure that quickly adds up. These added expenses can significantly raise the overall cost of implementing the Commission Hero system, making it prohibitive for beginners.

3. Frequent Facebook Ad Account Bans

Commission Hero relies heavily on Facebook ads for traffic generation, and this has caused a major problem for many users: Facebook ad account bans. Facebook has strict guidelines on advertising, and many users find that their accounts are banned for violating these rules. Although Blanchard advises students to set up multiple accounts and even suggests workarounds like using other people’s accounts, these strategies are short-term fixes and don’t always work. As Facebook continues to improve its algorithms, users are left with fewer options to get around these bans, which makes the system unsustainable for some.

4. Overhyped Claims

One of the most prevalent criticisms against Blanchard’s program is the exaggerated promises it makes. Many of the promotional materials suggest that users can earn large amounts of money quickly, with minimal experience or effort. While some participants have found success, the reality is that most users will require a significant amount of time, effort, and financial investment to see any return on investment, which often doesn’t match the promotional claims. For many, the process of setting up Facebook ads, finding the right audience, and generating consistent income is much harder and more expensive than advertised.

5. Limited Refund Options

Commission Hero’s refund policy has also been a source of frustration for users. Although there is a money-back guarantee, it requires users to wait a full 12 months before requesting a refund, during which they must provide proof that they followed the course material without success. For many users, this long waiting period is unhelpful, especially when they realize early on that the system may not be right for them.

6. Overreliance on Facebook Ads

Another common complaint is the course’s almost complete reliance on Facebook ads as the primary traffic source. While Facebook ads can be a powerful tool for affiliate marketing, relying solely on one platform exposes users to risks, including account bans and changes in Facebook’s policies. Additionally, Facebook ads can become expensive, and without diversification into other traffic sources, students find themselves at the mercy of a single platform’s policies.

7. Highly Saturated Market

The affiliate marketing space, especially on platforms like ClickBank, is highly competitive. Many students report that the strategies taught in Commission Hero are too common, with everyone using similar approaches. This leads to market saturation, making it harder to stand out and generate significant profits without large advertising budgets.

8. Lack of Passive Income

Despite its claims of offering passive income, Commission Hero’s model relies on constant ad spending. Unlike organic traffic strategies, which can offer long-term benefits, paid ads require continuous investment to maintain traffic flow and sales. For users looking for a hands-off, passive system, this active management and financial upkeep can be disappointing.

9. Limited Learning Value

While Commission Hero provides solid training on Facebook ads and affiliate marketing, many users feel that the course lacks unique insights. Some reviewers point out that the techniques taught in the program can be found for free online, making the high price unjustifiable. Additionally, the course does not cover building long-term assets like email lists or brands, which are crucial for sustainability in the affiliate marketing world.

10. Limited Support and Community

While Commission Hero does offer access to a private Facebook group and support, some users report feeling under-supported, especially when facing issues like account bans or struggling with ad performance. They note that the responses often point back to the same generic advice provided in the course, without deeper insights or one-on-one guidance.

In conclusion, while Commission Hero has helped some individuals succeed in affiliate marketing, the course is not without its flaws. High costs, exaggerated claims, and reliance on Facebook ads make it a risky investment for many, especially beginners without substantial financial backing. Before enrolling, potential users should carefully consider whether they have the resources and patience to navigate the challenges posed by Blanchard’s system.

How do we counteract this malpractice?

Once we ascertain the involvement of Robby Blanchard at Commission Hero (or actors working on behalf of Robby Blanchard at Commission Hero), we will inform Robby Blanchard at Commission Hero of our findings via Electronic Mail.

Our preliminary assessment suggests that Robby Blanchard at Commission Hero may have engaged a third-party reputation management agency or expert, which, either independently or under direct authorization from Robby Blanchard at Commission Hero, initiated efforts to remove adverse online content, including potentially fraudulent DMCA takedown requests. We will extend an opportunity to Robby Blanchard at Commission Hero to provide details regarding their communications with the agency or expert, as well as the identification of the individual(s) responsible for executing these false DMCA notices.

Failure to respond in a timely manner will necessitate a reassessment of our initial assumptions. In such an event, we will be compelled to take appropriate legal action to rectify the unlawful conduct and take the following steps –

Since Robby Blanchard at Commission Hero made such efforts to hide something online, it seems fit to ensure that this article and sensitive information targeted online by these events get a lot more exposure and traffic than what it would have received originally

We hope this becomes an excellent case study for the Streisand effect…The key idea behind the Streisand effect is that efforts to restrict information can backfire, often causing the information to gain more attention than it would have otherwise. This effect is widespread in the digital age, where users quickly notice and spread censorship efforts on social media and other platforms. Trying to suppress something can unintentionally lead to it becoming more visible, which Robby Blanchard at Commission Hero is finding out the hard way.

Potential Consequences for Robby Blanchard at Commission Hero

Under Florida Statute 831.01, the crime of Forgery is committed when a person falsifies, alters, counterfeits, or forges a document that carries “legal efficacy” with the intent to injure or defraud another person or entity.

Forging a document is considered a white-collar crime. It involves altering, changing, or modifying a document to deceive another person. It can also include passing along copies of documents that are known to be false. In many states in the US, falsifying a document is a crime punishable as a felony.

Additionally, under most laws, “fraud on the court” is where “a party has sentiently set in motion some unconscionable scheme calculated to interfere with the judicial system’s ability impartially to adjudicate a matter by improperly influencing the trier of fact or unfairly hampering the presentation of the opposing party’s claim or defense.”  Cox v. Burke, 706 So. 2d 43, 46 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998) (quoting Aoude v. Mobil Oil Corp., 892 F.2d 1115, 1118 (1st Cir. 1989)).

Is Robby Blanchard at Commission Hero Committing a Cyber Crime?

Yes, it seems so. Robby Blanchard at Commission Hero used multiple approaches to remove unwanted material from review sites and Google’s search results. Thanks to protections allowing freedom of speech in the United States, there are very few legal ways to do this. Robby Blanchard at Commission Hero could not eliminate negative reviews or search results that linked to them without a valid claim of defamation, copyright infringement, or some other clear breach of the law.

Faced with these limitations, some companies like Robby Blanchard at Commission Hero have gone to extreme lengths to fraudulently claim copyright ownership over a negative review in the hopes of taking it down.

Fake DMCA notices have targeted articles highlighting the criminal activity of prominent people to hide their illegal behavior. These people, which include US, Russian, and Khazakstani politicians as well as members from elite circles including the mafia and those with massive financial power, are all connected – and alleged corruption ranging from child abuse to sexual harassment is exposed when exploring evidence found at these URLs. It appears there’s a disturbing level of influence being exerted here that needs further investigation before justice can be served. Robby Blanchard at Commission Hero is certainly keeping interesting company here….

The DMCA takedown process requires that copyright owners submit a takedown notice to an ISP identifying the allegedly infringing content and declaring, under penalty of perjury, that they have a good faith belief that the content is infringing. The ISP must then promptly remove or disable access to the content. The alleged infringer can then submit a counter-notice, and if the copyright owner does not take legal action within 10 to 14 days, the ISP can restore the content.

Since these platforms are predominantly based in the U.S., the complaints are typically made under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA), which requires online service providers and platforms to react immediately to reports or violations. Big Tech companies rarely have systems in place to assess the merit of each report. Instead, all bad actors need to do is clone a story, backdate it, and then demand the real thing be taken down.

Reputation Agency's Modus Operandi

The fake DMCA notices we found always use the “back-dated article” technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a “true original” article and back-dates it, creating a “fake original” article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original.

Then, based on the claim that this backdated article is the “original,” the scammers send a DMCA to the relevant online service providers (e.g. Google), alleging that the ‘true’ original is the copied or “infringing” article and that the copied article is the “original,” requesting the takedown of the ‘true’ original article. After sending the DMCA request, the person who sent the wrong notice takes down the fake original URL, likely to make sure that the article doesn’t stay online in any way. If the takedown notice is successful, the disappearance from the internet of information is most likely to be legitimate speech.

As an integral part of this scheme, the ‘reputation management’ company hired by Robby Blanchard at Commission Hero creates a website that purports to be a ‘news’ site. This site is designed to look legitimate at a glance, but any degree of scrutiny reveals it as the charade it is.

The company copies the ‘negative’ content and posts it “on the fake ‘news’ site, attributing it to a separate author,” then gives it “a false publication date on the ‘news’ website that predated the original publication.

The reputation company then sent Google a Digital Millennium Copyright Act notice claiming the original website infringed copyright. After a cursory examination of the fake news site, Google frequently accepts the notice and delists the content.

In committing numerous offences, Robby Blanchard at Commission Hero either premeditated actions or were unaware of the consequences. Despite hiring an agency to make Google disregard any negative information about Robby Blanchard at Commission Hero, ignorance does not excuse this wrongdoing.

Fake DMCA notices have targeted articles highlighting the criminal activity of prominent people to hide their illegal behavior. These people, which include US, Russian, and Khazakstani politicians as well as members from elite circles including the mafia and those with massive financial power, are all connected – and alleged corruption ranging from child abuse to sexual harassment is exposed when exploring evidence found at these URLs. It appears there’s a disturbing level of influence being exerted here that needs further investigation before justice can be served. FSMSmart is certainly keeping interesting company here.

The Reputation Laundering

Rogue Reputation agencies use spurious copyright claims and fake legal notices to remove and obscure articles linking clients to allegations of tax avoidance, corruption, and drug trafficking. Most of these reputation agencies are based offshore, mainly in Russia, India, and Eastern Europe, and they do not worry about complying with US-based laws.

The content in all of the articles for which the fraudulent DMCA notices have been sent relates to allegations of criminal allegations, including corruption, child abuse, sexual harassment, human trafficking and financial fraud against businesses and individuals with ultra-high net worth.

In addition to the misuse of the DMCA takedown process, there is a notable absence of enforcement concerning perjury violations. The statutory requirement related to perjury is designed to deter copyright holders from submitting fraudulent or knowingly false takedown requests, as they may face legal consequences for making false declarations under penalty of perjury. However, to date, there have been no known instances of any individual being prosecuted for perjury in connection with the submission of false DMCA takedown notices.

This lack of enforcement has emboldened copyright holders to exploit the DMCA takedown process to suppress dissent, criticism, or other unfavorable content, without fear of legal repercussions.

Some of the people and businesses who have employed this tactic to remove legitimate content from Google illegally include a Spanish businessman-turned-cocaine-trafficker, Organised crime, an Israeli-Argentine banker accused of laundering money for Hugo Chávez’s regime, a French “responsible” mining company accused of tax evasion, child molesters and sexual predators. Robby Blanchard at Commission Hero is in great company ….

What else is Robby Blanchard at Commission Hero hiding?

We encourage you to ‘Dork‘ Google by searching for keyword combinations such as [Robby Blanchard at Commission Hero] + {Negative Keyword, such as Scam, Fraud, Complaints, Lawsuit, Sanction, etc} on Google. It’s likely if you scroll down to the bottom of this Google search results, you’ll stumble upon this Legal Takedown notice (pictured below)

To make such an investigation possible, we encourage more online service providers to come forward and share copies of content removal requests with industry experts and researchers. If you have any information on Robby Blanchard at Commission Hero that you want to share with experts and journalists, kindly email the author directly at [email protected].

All communications are strictly confidential and safeguarded under a comprehensive Whistleblower Policy, ensuring full protection and anonymity for individuals who provide information.