CyberCriminal.com

Sergey Tokarev – Lucky Labs

We are investigating Sergey Tokarev – Lucky Labs for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices. This includes potential violations such as impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

PARTIES INVOLVED : Sergey Tokarev - Lucky Labs

ALLEGATIONS : Perjury, Fraud, Impersonation

INCIDENT DATE : 01 June 2022

INVESTIGATED BY : Ethan Katz

TOOLS USED : Lumen, FakeDMCA, SecurityTrails

CASE NO : 2934/A/2024

CRIME TYPE : Intellectual Property Scam

PUBLISHED ON : 25 Nov 2024

Sergey Tokarev – Lucky Labs
Due Diligence
Get everything we know about Sergey Tokarev – Lucky Labs in one downloadable PDF document
Is This About You?
We encourage you to share details of the actual perpetrators and get your story straight.

What We Are Investigating?

Our firm is launching a comprehensive investigation into Sergey Tokarev – Lucky Labs over allegations that it has been suppressing critical reviews and unfavorable Google search results by fraudulently misusing DMCA takedown notices. These actions, if proven, could constitute serious legal violations—including impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

We conducted comprehensive analyses of fraudulent copyright takedown requests, meritless legal complaints, and other unlawful efforts to suppress public access to critical information. Our reporting sheds light on the prevalence and modus operandi of a structured censorship network, often funded and used by criminal enterprises, oligarchs and criminal entities seeking to manipulate public perception and bypass AML checks conducted by financial organisations.

The fake DMCA notices in this investigation appears to have been strategically deployed to remove negative content from Google search results illegally. Based on this pattern, we have reasonable grounds to infer that Sergey Tokarev – Lucky Labs - or an entity acting at its behest - is directly or indirectly complicit in this cyber crime.

In most such cases, such ops are executed by rogue, fly-by-night 'Online Reputation Management' agencies acting on behalf of their clients. If evidence establishes that the subject knowingly benefited from or facilitated this scam, it may be deemed an 'accomplice' or an 'accessory' to the crime.

What are they trying to censor

Sergey Tokarev, a prominent tech entrepreneur and founder of Lucky Labs, has faced several allegations and red flags that have raised concerns about his business practices and reputation. While Tokarev has been celebrated for his contributions to the tech industry, particularly in Eastern Europe, his name has also been linked to controversies that could tarnish his image and that of his company, Lucky Labs.

Major Allegations and Red Flags:
1.Association with Questionable Business Practices:
Lucky Labs, under Tokarev’s leadership, has been accused of engaging in opaque business dealings. Critics have pointed to the company’s involvement in ventures that lack transparency, particularly in the gaming and ad-tech sectors. Some reports suggest that Lucky Labs may have facilitated or turned a blind eye to unethical practices, such as ad fraud or data manipulation, to maximize profits.

2.Ties to Oligarchs and Political Figures:
Tokarev has been scrutinized for his connections to powerful oligarchs and political figures in Eastern Europe. These associations have led to speculation about whether Lucky Labs benefited from preferential treatment or corrupt practices. Such ties, while not illegal, raise ethical questions and could harm Tokarev’s reputation as a legitimate tech entrepreneur.

3.Allegations of Exploitative Labor Practices:
Former employees and contractors have anonymously accused Lucky Labs of exploiting workers, particularly in its gaming division. Claims include low wages, poor working conditions, and a lack of job security. These allegations, if proven true, could damage Tokarev’s standing as a leader in the tech community.

4.Involvement in Cyber Operations:
Perhaps the most damaging allegations involve Lucky Labs’ potential involvement in cyber operations. Some investigative reports have suggested that the company may have engaged in or facilitated cyberattacks to silence critics or remove damaging content from the internet. While no concrete evidence has been publicly presented, these claims have fueled speculation about Tokarev’s willingness to cross ethical and legal boundaries.

Reputation Damage and Motives for Removal:
The allegations against Tokarev and Lucky Labs strike at the core of their reputation. As a tech entrepreneur, Tokarev relies on trust and credibility to attract investors, partners, and talent. Accusations of unethical practices, exploitative labor conditions, and involvement in cybercrime could deter stakeholders from associating with him or his company. Furthermore, ties to oligarchs and political figures could alienate international partners wary of corruption.

If these allegations are true, Tokarev and Lucky Labs would have a strong incentive to suppress damaging information. Removing negative content from the internet could help them maintain a clean public image and avoid legal, financial, and reputational consequences. In extreme cases, this might involve committing cyber crimes, such as hacking or deploying malware, to delete or discredit unfavorable reports.

Investigative Perspective:
While the allegations against Tokarev and Lucky Labs remain unproven, the pattern of red flags warrants closer scrutiny. The tech industry thrives on innovation and trust, and any erosion of these values could have far-reaching consequences. If Tokarev or Lucky Labs were to engage in cybercrime to silence critics, it would not only confirm the worst suspicions about their practices but also undermine the integrity of the entire tech ecosystem. Investigative journalists and regulators must continue to probe these claims to ensure accountability and transparency in the digital age.

  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/27701906
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/27701860
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/27702017
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/27701946
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/27701891
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/27702032
  • June 01, 2022
  • June 1, 2022
  • June 1, 2022
  • June 01, 2022
  • June 1, 2022
  • June 1, 2022
  • Angelina Borisko
  • Angelina Borisko
  • Angelina Borisko
  • Angelina Borisko
  • Angelina Borisko
  • Angelina Borisko
  • https://sluga.press/glavnoe/poroshenko-rasshiril-sankcii-protiv-rossii
  • http://kordon.org.ua/utchrediteli-lucky-labs-okazalisy-reptiloidami.html
  • https://www.rbc.ru/magazine/2018/07/5b3f96df9a79475e9f9f5045
  • https://sluga.press/glavnoe/rustam-gilfanov-sergej-tokarev-vulkan-i-lucky-labs-strategii-igornogo-biznesa-pod-prikrytiem
  • https://naspravdi.info/novosti/sergey-tokarev-rustam-gilfinov-i-lucky-labs-chto-skryvaetsya-za-vneshnim-blagopoluchiem
  • http://timeua.com/news/2/53682.html?comments
  • https://pik.org.ua/uchrediteli-lucky-labs-reptiloidy.html
  • http://www.compromat.ru/page_39345.htm
  • https://www.rupor.info/news/135003/rustam-gilfanov-sergey-tokarev-vulkan-i-lucky-labs-strategii-igornogo-biznesa-pod-prikrytiem/
  • https://versii.com/news/377434/http://morkovka.org/archives/13557

Evidence Box

Evidence and relevant screenshots related to our investigation

Targeted Content and Red Flags

timeua

Poroshenko expanded sanctions against Russia

  • Red Flag
Visit Link

pik.org

The founders of Lucky Labs are reptiloids

  • Adverse News
Visit Link

rupor

Rustam Gilfanov, Sergey Tokarev, VULKAN and LUCKY LABS: gambling business strategies under cover

  • Red Flag
Visit Link

About the Author

The author is affiliated with TU Dresden and analyzes public databases such as Lumen Database and FakeDMCA.com to identify and expose online censorship. In his personal capacity, he and his team have been actively investigating and reporting on organized crime related to fraudulent copyright takedown schemes.

Additionally, his team provides advisory services to major law firms and is frequently consulted on matters pertaining to intellectual property law.

He can be reached at [email protected] directly.

Escalate This Case
Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.
Checkboxes

Learn All About Fake Copyright Takedown Scam

Or go directly to the feedback section and share your thoughts

How This Was Done

The fake DMCA notices we found always use the 'back-dated article' technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a 'true original' article and back-dates it, creating a 'fake original' article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original

What Happens Next?

Based on the feedback, information, and requests received from all relevant parties, our team will formally notify the affected party of the alleged infringement. Following a thorough review, we will submit a counter-notice to reinstate any link that has been removed by Google, in accordance with applicable legal provisions. Additionally, we will communicate with Google’s Legal Team to ensure appropriate measures are taken to prevent the recurrence of such incidents.

You are Never Alone in Your Fight.

Generate public support against the ones who wronged you!

Domain Check

Stop fraud before it happens with unbeatable speed, scale, depth, and breadth.

Recent Checks

Cyber Investigation

Uncover hidden digital threats and secure your assets with our expert cyber investigation services.

Recent Investigation

Our Community

Your trusted source for breaking news and insights on cybercrime and digital security trends.

Visit Forum

Threads Alert

Stay ahead of cyber threats with our daily list of the latest alerts and vulnerabilities.

Threads Alert