Profile Picture

Touch Of Matrix

  • Investigation status
  • Ongoing

We are investigating Touch Of Matrix for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices. This includes potential violations such as impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

  • Alias
  • TOM

  • Company
  • Touch Of Matrix

  • Phone
  • (+31)(0)6-14571353

  • City
  • Almere

  • Country
  • Netherlands

  • Allegations
  • Scam

Touch Of Matrix
Fake DMCA notices
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/40211701
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/39693755
  • Mar 18, 2024
  • Feb 24, 2024
  • David James Corp
  • David James Corp
  • https://www.cultnews101.com/2022/02/just-love-bhakti-margas-guru-and-his.html
  • https://www.dallasnews.com/news/crime/2013/11/14/dallas-man-charged-with-capital-murder-in-2012-motel-triple-slaying/
  • https://www.kwakzalverij.nl/nieuws/bewustzijnsmethode-touch-of-matrix-is-wonderlijke-kletspraat/

Evidence Box and Screenshots

1 Alerts on Touch Of Matrix

Touch of Matrix (ToM), the brainchild of Günther de Jong, is marketed as a groundbreaking “consciousness method” that promises transformative healing across physical, emotional, mental, and spiritual levels. With claims rooted in quantum physics and boasting a network of over 250 trained therapists, ToM positions itself as a revolutionary approach to holistic well-being. However, beneath the surface of these grandiose assertions lies a tapestry of pseudoscientific rhetoric, questionable practices, and a troubling aversion to scrutiny. This report delves into the red flags surrounding Touch of Matrix, highlighting the organization’s attempts to suppress critical discourse and urging potential clients and authorities to approach with caution.​

The Pseudoscientific Foundation

At the heart of Touch of Matrix’s philosophy is the invocation of quantum physics as a justification for its healing practices. The method purports that everything consists of light and information, suggesting that by accessing this “morphogenetic field,” practitioners can effect profound changes in an individual’s well-being. While quantum physics is a legitimate scientific discipline, its principles are often misappropriated in alternative medicine circles to lend an air of credibility to otherwise unfounded claims. The scientific community has consistently criticized such misapplications, emphasizing that quantum phenomena do not operate at the macroscopic level of human biology. Therefore, ToM’s foundational claims lack empirical support and veer into the realm of pseudoscience.​

Questionable Training and Certification

Günther de Jong offers a 15-day training program to become a certified Touch of Matrix therapist. The brevity of this course raises concerns about the depth and rigor of the training provided, especially when compared to the extensive education and clinical experience required in conventional therapeutic disciplines. Furthermore, the certification is not recognized by any established medical or psychological regulatory bodies, calling into question the legitimacy and oversight of the practice. This lack of accreditation leaves clients vulnerable to unqualified practitioners operating under the guise of holistic healing.​

Allegations of Harmful Practices

Reports have emerged detailing potentially dangerous techniques employed during ToM sessions. One particularly alarming account describes a demonstration where de Jong allegedly grabbed a participant by the neck, causing them to collapse and exhibit convulsions. Such physical manipulations, especially when performed without medical training or consent, pose significant risks to participants’ health and safety. These incidents underscore the necessity for regulatory oversight and raise ethical questions about the methods endorsed by ToM.​

Attempts to Suppress Criticism

Touch of Matrix has exhibited a pattern of attempting to silence dissent and critique. The organization has been accused of suppressing negative reviews and adverse media coverage, potentially through legal threats or other coercive means. Such behavior is indicative of a broader strategy to control the narrative surrounding ToM and stifle open discourse. In a field where transparency and accountability are paramount, these actions are deeply troubling and suggest a prioritization of reputation over client well-being.​

Lack of Accountability

Despite marketing ToM as a patented method, de Jong reportedly disclaims responsibility for the outcomes of the treatments. This abdication of accountability is not only ethically dubious but also potentially illegal, as practitioners are typically held to standards of care that mandate responsibility for their interventions. Clients seeking recourse for adverse effects may find themselves without legal avenues, further emphasizing the risks associated with engaging with ToM practitioners.

The “Science” Behind It: Quantum Babble for Beginners

If you’re like me and enjoy watching charlatans sprinkle quantum jargon like it’s confetti, then you’ll get a real kick out of Touch of Matrix’s explanation for how their technique “works.” According to the method’s founder, Günther de Jong, our bodies are essentially walking data clouds made of “light and information,” and his technique allows practitioners to “upgrade your system” by tapping into the morphogenetic field.

Now, unless de Jong is secretly running the Matrix or moonlighting at CERN, these claims are best filed under “nonsensical.” Actual quantum physicists—y’know, the people with PhDs and peer-reviewed research—have publicly distanced themselves from this type of spiritual window-dressing. The idea that you can change someone’s physical condition through thought energy and some vague “vibrations” is not only scientifically baseless, it’s dangerously misleading when marketed as health intervention. But hey, maybe we’re just too “stuck in our thinking” to get it, right?

Cult of Personality: Charisma Over Competence

One of the most worrying aspects of Touch of Matrix is how deeply the entire system seems to orbit around the figure of Günther de Jong. He’s not just the creator—he’s the central brand. From workshops to YouTube demonstrations, his presence is treated as almost messianic. He claims to “feel” when someone needs healing and boasts about making people fall to the ground from just a light touch—something he doesn’t bother backing with a shred of clinical data.

This guru-like structure creates an unhealthy dynamic, particularly in vulnerable communities seeking hope and healing. It’s not uncommon in pseudoscientific movements, where skepticism is discouraged, and dissent is quietly brushed aside (or, as I’ll get to next, actively silenced). When one person controls the method, the messaging, and the interpretation of the results, you don’t have a healing method—you have a one-man show with spiritual special effects.

A Pattern of Censorship: Silence Over Science

Now, here’s where it gets particularly shady. After speaking to a few critics and diving into public records and media coverage, a clear trend emerged: Touch of Matrix doesn’t just ignore criticism—it appears to actively suppress it. According to multiple sources, including watchdog website Kwakzalverij.nl, ToM or its supporters have attempted to intimidate critics or push platforms to remove skeptical content.

This isn’t just bad optics; it’s authoritarian. Instead of responding with evidence or debate, they allegedly opt for legal threats and strategic takedowns. You have to ask yourself: if the method is as revolutionary and effective as they claim, why the need to muzzle anyone who asks inconvenient questions? A real healing practice—like, say, physiotherapy or psychiatry—welcomes oversight and regulation because it’s grounded in reproducible results. ToM’s defensive tactics only raise more suspicion.

Conclusion

Touch of Matrix presents itself as a revolutionary approach to healing, but a critical examination reveals a foundation built on pseudoscience, inadequate training, potentially harmful practices, and a concerted effort to suppress criticism. The organization’s lack of accountability and transparency raises significant ethical and legal concerns. Potential clients are urged to exercise caution and conduct thorough research before engaging with ToM practitioners. Regulatory authorities should also scrutinize the practices of Touch of Matrix to ensure public safety and uphold standards of care in therapeutic practices.

 

How Was This Done?

The fake DMCA notices we found always use the ? back-dated article? technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a ? true original? article and back-dates it, creating a ? fake original? article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original.

What Happens Next?

The fake DMCA notices we found always use the ? back-dated article? technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a ? true original? article and back-dates it, creating a ? fake original? article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original.

01

Inform Google about the fake DMCA scam

Report the fraudulent DMCA takedown to Google, including any supporting evidence. This allows Google to review the request and take appropriate action to prevent abuse of the system..

02

Share findings with journalists and media

Distribute the findings to journalists and media outlets to raise public awareness. Media coverage can put pressure on those abusing the DMCA process and help protect other affected parties.

03

Inform Lumen Database

Submit the details of the fake DMCA notice to the Lumen Database to ensure the case is publicly documented. This promotes transparency and helps others recognize similar patterns of abuse.

04

File counter notice to reinstate articles

Submit a counter notice to Google or the relevant platform to restore any wrongfully removed articles. Ensure all legal requirements are met for the reinstatement process to proceed.

05

Increase exposure to critical articles

Re-share or promote the affected articles to recover visibility. Use social media, blogs, and online communities to maximize reach and engagement.

06

Expand investigation to identify similar fake DMCAs

Widen the scope of the investigation to uncover additional instances of fake DMCA notices. Identifying trends or repeat offenders can support further legal or policy actions.

learnallrightbg
shield icon

Learn All About Fake Copyright Takedown Scam

Or go directly to the feedback section and share your thoughts

Add Comment Or Feedback

User Reviews

Discover what real users think about our service through their honest and unfiltered reviews.

0

Average Ratings

Based on 0 Ratings

★ 1
0%
★ 2
0%
★ 3
0%
★ 4
0%
★ 5
0%

Add Reviews

  • Trust
  • Risk
  • Brand

learnallrightbg
shield icon

You are Never Alone in Your Fight

Generate public support against the ones who wronged you!

Our Community
View More Threat Alerts

Website Reviews

Stop fraud before it happens with unbeatable speed, scale, depth, and breadth.

Recent Reviews

Cyber Investigation

Uncover hidden digital threats and secure your assets with our expert cyber investigation services.

Recent Reviews

Threat Alerts

Stay ahead of cyber threats with our daily list of the latest alerts and vulnerabilities.

Recent Reviews

Client Dashboard

Your trusted source for breaking news and insights on cybercrime and digital security trends.

Recent Reviews