CyberCriminal.com

TrendsMacro

We are investigating TrendsMacro for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices. This includes potential violations such as impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

PARTIES INVOLVED : TrendsMacro

ALLEGATIONS : Perjury, Fraud, Impersonation

INCIDENT DATE : 23 June 2021

INVESTIGATED BY : Ethan Katz

TOOLS USED : Lumen, FakeDMCA, SecurityTrails

CASE NO : 2948/A/2024

CRIME TYPE : Intellectual Property Scam

PUBLISHED ON : 25 Nov 2024

TrendsMacro
Due Diligence
Get everything we know about TrendsMacro in one downloadable PDF document
Is This About You?
We encourage you to share details of the actual perpetrators and get your story straight.

What We Are Investigating?

Our firm is launching a comprehensive investigation into TrendsMacro over allegations that it has been suppressing critical reviews and unfavorable Google search results by fraudulently misusing DMCA takedown notices. These actions, if proven, could constitute serious legal violations—including impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

We conducted comprehensive analyses of fraudulent copyright takedown requests, meritless legal complaints, and other unlawful efforts to suppress public access to critical information. Our reporting sheds light on the prevalence and modus operandi of a structured censorship network, often funded and used by criminal enterprises, oligarchs and criminal entities seeking to manipulate public perception and bypass AML checks conducted by financial organisations.

The fake DMCA notices in this investigation appears to have been strategically deployed to remove negative content from Google search results illegally. Based on this pattern, we have reasonable grounds to infer that TrendsMacro - or an entity acting at its behest - is directly or indirectly complicit in this cyber crime.

In most such cases, such ops are executed by rogue, fly-by-night 'Online Reputation Management' agencies acting on behalf of their clients. If evidence establishes that the subject knowingly benefited from or facilitated this scam, it may be deemed an 'accomplice' or an 'accessory' to the crime.

What are they trying to censor

TrendsMacro, a financial analytics and investment research firm, has faced a series of allegations, red flags, and adverse news that have raised questions about its credibility, business practices, and ethical standards. While the company has positioned itself as a leader in macroeconomic analysis, several incidents have cast a shadow over its reputation, prompting speculation about its motives and actions.

Major Allegations and Red Flags
1.Misleading Investment Advice:
TrendsMacro has been accused of providing misleading or overly optimistic investment advice to clients. Critics argue that the firm’s forecasts and recommendations often lack transparency, with some alleging that the company cherry-picks data to support predetermined narratives. This has led to significant financial losses for some investors, who claim they were misled by TrendsMacro’s analyses.

2.Conflict of Interest:
Reports have surfaced suggesting that TrendsMacro may have undisclosed conflicts of interest. Specifically, the firm has been linked to hedge funds and institutional investors who may benefit from the dissemination of certain market predictions. This has raised concerns about whether TrendsMacro’s research is truly independent or influenced by external financial incentives.

3.Data Manipulation Allegations:
Former employees and industry insiders have alleged that TrendsMacro may manipulate or selectively present data to align with its clients’ interests or its own market positions. These claims, if proven, would undermine the firm’s credibility as a trusted source of macroeconomic analysis.

4.Legal and Regulatory Scrutiny:
TrendsMacro has reportedly faced scrutiny from regulatory bodies over its business practices. While details remain scarce, the firm has been linked to investigations involving market manipulation and insider trading. These allegations, even if unproven, have damaged its reputation within the financial community.

5.Adverse Media Coverage:
Several high-profile media outlets have published critical pieces about TrendsMacro, questioning the accuracy of its predictions and the integrity of its operations. These reports have amplified concerns about the firm’s trustworthiness and have led to a loss of confidence among some clients.

Reputational Harm and Motives for Removal
The allegations and adverse news surrounding TrendsMacro have significantly harmed its reputation. In the financial industry, trust and credibility are paramount, and any suggestion of unethical behavior or incompetence can lead to a loss of clients, partnerships, and revenue. For TrendsMacro, the stakes are particularly high, as its business model relies heavily on its perceived expertise and reliability.

The firm’s desire to remove damaging stories and information from the public domain is understandable, given the potential consequences. Negative media coverage and allegations of misconduct can deter potential clients, attract regulatory scrutiny, and erode investor confidence. In extreme cases, such reputational damage could even lead to legal action or the collapse of the business.

However, the suggestion that TrendsMacro might resort to cybercrime to achieve this goal is deeply troubling. If true, it would represent a blatant disregard for the law and ethical standards. Cyberattacks aimed at suppressing negative information could include hacking, doxxing, or deploying malware to remove or alter online content. Such actions would not only compound the firm’s legal and ethical issues but also further damage its reputation if discovered.

Conclusion
TrendsMacro’s alleged misconduct and the resulting adverse publicity have created a precarious situation for the firm. While the desire to protect its reputation is understandable, any attempt to suppress information through illegal means would be a dangerous escalation. The financial industry relies on transparency and trust, and any actions that undermine these principles could have far-reaching consequences for TrendsMacro and its stakeholders. As the story unfolds, it serves as a cautionary tale about the importance of ethical conduct in the high-stakes world of financial analytics.

  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/24339397
  • June 23, 2021
  • Svetlana Rager
  • https://penzu.com/p/ae9549a5
  • https://globalfraudprotection.com/scam-recovery/trendsmacro-broker-review/

Evidence Box

Evidence and relevant screenshots related to our investigation

Targeted Content and Red Flags

globalfraudprotection

TrendsMacro Review – Is This Unregulated Broker Scamming People

  • Red Flag
Visit Link

fca

Unauthorised firm

  • Red Flag
Visit Link

brokerchooser

Is Trendsmacro / Ascana Group Ltd safe

  • Adverse News
Visit Link

About the Author

The author is affiliated with TU Dresden and analyzes public databases such as Lumen Database and FakeDMCA.com to identify and expose online censorship. In his personal capacity, he and his team have been actively investigating and reporting on organized crime related to fraudulent copyright takedown schemes.

Additionally, his team provides advisory services to major law firms and is frequently consulted on matters pertaining to intellectual property law.

He can be reached at [email protected] directly.

Escalate This Case
Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.
Checkboxes

Learn All About Fake Copyright Takedown Scam

Or go directly to the feedback section and share your thoughts

How This Was Done

The fake DMCA notices we found always use the 'back-dated article' technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a 'true original' article and back-dates it, creating a 'fake original' article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original

What Happens Next?

Based on the feedback, information, and requests received from all relevant parties, our team will formally notify the affected party of the alleged infringement. Following a thorough review, we will submit a counter-notice to reinstate any link that has been removed by Google, in accordance with applicable legal provisions. Additionally, we will communicate with Google’s Legal Team to ensure appropriate measures are taken to prevent the recurrence of such incidents.

You are Never Alone in Your Fight.

Generate public support against the ones who wronged you!

Domain Check

Stop fraud before it happens with unbeatable speed, scale, depth, and breadth.

Recent Checks

Cyber Investigation

Uncover hidden digital threats and secure your assets with our expert cyber investigation services.

Recent Investigation

Our Community

Your trusted source for breaking news and insights on cybercrime and digital security trends.

Visit Forum

Threads Alert

Stay ahead of cyber threats with our daily list of the latest alerts and vulnerabilities.

Threads Alert