Erland Bakke

Full Report

Key Points

• Erland Bakke, a former Norwegian celebrity manager, was convicted of document forgery and perjury, resulting in a 30-day prison sentence upheld by Norway’s Supreme Court in 2023.
• Legal troubles stem from a fabricated email used in a lawsuit against TV personality Mads Hansen, related to a dispute over social media criticism.
• Bakke has been involved in multiple business ventures, holding nine roles in Norwegian companies, but specific details about his current professional activities are limited.
• Public sentiment, as seen in X posts, suggests controversy and distrust, with accusations of threatening behavior and abuse of power.

Overview

Erland Bakke is a Norwegian individual previously known as a celebrity manager, representing clients in the entertainment industry. He has been involved in various business activities, with records indicating nine roles in Norwegian companies, including ownership of ordinary shares. Bakke gained public attention due to a high-profile legal case involving document forgery and perjury, which culminated in a 30-day prison sentence in 2023. Beyond his legal issues, Bakke has a presence on platforms like SoundCloud, where he shares music, suggesting interests in creative or media-related fields.

Allegations and Concerns

• Document Forgery and Perjury (2021-2023): Bakke was accused of fabricating an email purportedly from Playboy model Amalie Olufsen to support a lawsuit against TV personality Mads Hansen. The email was intended to show that Bakke lost a client due to Hansen’s social media criticism. He was convicted in 2022 and sentenced to 30 days in prison, a ruling upheld by Norway’s Supreme Court in September 2023.
• Conflict with Mads Hansen: The legal case arose from a dispute where Hansen publicly criticized Bakke on Instagram, calling him “sleazy.” Bakke’s lawsuit against Hansen, supported by the fabricated email, led to accusations of attempting to mislead the court.
• Public Accusations of Misconduct: A 2021 X post by @tophepahle accused Bakke of threatening, intimidating, and spreading lies about individuals under his influence, framing his actions as a violation of personal privacy. This suggests broader reputational concerns beyond the legal case.

Customer Feedback

No direct customer or client reviews are available in the provided sources, likely due to Bakke’s role as an individual rather than a consumer-facing business. However, public sentiment can be inferred from legal proceedings and social media:

• Negative Feedback: The X post by @tophepahle reflects distrust, stating, “To threaten, intimidate, sue, report, and spread lies about people over whom one has power, both in life and career, is primarily in the private sphere.” This suggests perceptions of Bakke as manipulative or abusive in professional relationships.
• Legal Testimony Context: During the 2022 trial, comedian Morten Ramm, a spectator, expressed skepticism about Bakke’s credibility, saying, “We’ll see if I can take him even less seriously than I already have.” This indicates negative sentiment among peers in the entertainment industry.
• Positive Feedback: No positive reviews or endorsements are documented in the available sources, limiting the ability to present a balanced view of Bakke’s reputation.

Risk Considerations

• Reputational Risk: Bakke’s conviction and public disputes have likely damaged his credibility, particularly in the entertainment and business sectors. Negative media coverage and social media criticism amplify this risk.
• Legal Risk: The upheld conviction and associated financial penalties (e.g., 80,000 NOK to Hansen’s company and 5,000 NOK in court costs) indicate ongoing legal vulnerabilities. Further lawsuits or appeals could arise from related disputes.
• Financial Risk: While no bankruptcy records are mentioned, the financial penalties and legal costs may strain Bakke’s resources, especially if his business ventures are not generating significant revenue.
• Professional Risk: As a former celebrity manager, Bakke’s ability to secure new clients or maintain business roles may be compromised due to his criminal record and public controversies.

Business Relations and Associations

• Business Roles: Bakke holds nine roles in Norwegian companies, with ownership of ordinary shares, as per Proff.no. Specific company names or activities are not detailed in the sources.
• Legal Adversaries: Bakke’s primary documented association is his conflict with Mads Hansen and Hansen’s company, Fist Magnet Entertainment. Hansen’s lawyer, Constance Jessen Holm, and Bakke’s lawyer, Knut Helge Hurum, were involved in the legal proceedings.
• Entertainment Industry Connections: The presence of comedian Morten Ramm and references to clients like Amalie Olufsen indicate past ties to Norway’s entertainment scene, though these relationships appear strained or severed.

Legal and Financial Concerns

• Conviction for Document Forgery and Perjury: In May 2022, Bakke was sentenced to 30 days in prison for fabricating an email and providing false testimony in a lawsuit against Mads Hansen. The conviction was upheld by the Borgarting Court of Appeal and Norway’s Supreme Court in 2023.
• Financial Penalties: Bakke was ordered to pay 80,000 NOK to Fist Magnet Entertainment, 13,000 NOK for Hansen’s legal costs, and 5,000 NOK in public court costs.
• Civil Lawsuit: The 2021 lawsuit against Hansen, where Bakke sought 100,000 NOK in damages, was undermined by the forged email, leading to the criminal charges.
• No Bankruptcy or Debt Records: The sources do not mention bankruptcy filings, unpaid debts, or other financial distress, but legal penalties may impact Bakke’s financial stability.

Risk Assessment Table

Erland Bakke’s profile reveals a controversial figure whose legal and reputational challenges overshadow his professional accomplishments. His conviction for document forgery and perjury, stemming from a fabricated email in a lawsuit, demonstrates a willingness to engage in deceptive practices, which severely undermines his trustworthiness. The public nature of his disputes, amplified by media coverage and social media criticism, further erodes his standing in Norway’s entertainment and business communities.

Cautionary Advice: Individuals or businesses considering partnerships with Bakke should exercise extreme caution. His documented history of deceptive behavior and ongoing reputational damage make him a high-risk associate. Verify any claims about his current activities or business ventures through primary sources, such as company registries or legal records. Regular monitoring of legal and media updates is advisable to stay informed about any new developments.