Imran Mohammed Kamal

• Denied membership in RITANZ on good character grounds due to the conviction, with judicial review and appeal both dismissed in 2021.
• Operates as an insolvency practitioner through Liquidation Management Limited and New Zealand Debt Solvers, despite ongoing regulatory barriers.
• Accused in 2025 of using a liquidator as a proxy to continue practicing, leading to an investigation.
• Withdrew appeal against loss of tax agent status for his company.
• Limited public feedback, primarily negative, highlighting reputational damage from the fraud conviction.

Imran Mohammed Kamal is a Wellington-based accountant and insolvency practitioner specializing in tax advice, business consulting, and liquidation services. He founded and manages Liquidation Management Limited and serves as Managing Director of New Zealand Debt Solvers, focusing on debt resolution and insolvency proceedings for businesses and individuals in New Zealand.

• Convicted in 2013 of tax fraud for knowingly submitting false GST and income tax returns based on fabricated invoices totaling $137,000, linked to a scheme with accountants Mark Gilchrist and David Anderson.
• Faced disciplinary sanctions from the New Zealand Institute of Chartered Accountants in 2009 and 2010 prior to the fraud conviction.
• In 2015, Inland Revenue Department sought to ban him from acting as a liquidator, citing the conviction.
• Denied RITANZ membership in 2021, with the High Court upholding the decision despite procedural errors, emphasizing failure on the “good character” test.
• In 2025, accused of orchestrating a proxy arrangement with another liquidator to bypass licensing restrictions, prompting an investigation.
• Withdrew a 2016 appeal challenging the revocation of his company’s tax agent status.

Publicly available consumer reviews on Kamal are scarce, with no positive testimonials identified in searches across professional directories or social platforms. Negative sentiment dominates, exemplified by a 2021 Reddit comment describing him as “scummy” due to the publicized tax fraud conviction and questioning his trustworthiness in financial matters. No specific client complaints or endorsements were found in insolvency-related forums or review sites.

Engaging with Kamal or his firms carries substantial financial risks, including potential exposure to incomplete or delayed liquidation processes given his history of regulatory denials and proxy allegations, which could lead to unrecoverable assets or escalated creditor losses. Reputational risks are high, as associations with a convicted fraudster may damage stakeholder confidence and invite media scrutiny. Legal risks encompass ongoing investigations into proxy practices and the possibility of further sanctions from bodies like the Inland Revenue Department or NZICA, potentially resulting in contract voids or personal liability.

Kamal’s primary business ties include his role as liquidator for entities such as MP&A Limited (appointed 2020) and PMR Holdings Limited (appointed 2019), handled through Liquidation Management Limited. He proposed a professional arrangement with accredited practitioner David Thomas to facilitate liquidation work, though this was rejected by regulators as non-compliant. Earlier associations involve the 2013 tax fraud scheme with Mark Gilchrist and David Anderson, whose fake invoice operation funneled payments through Kamal’s firm, Accountants First. No current partnerships were identified beyond his own operations.

• 2013 tax fraud conviction: Five charges of providing false tax returns, sentenced to three months’ home detention, 150 hours community service, and repayment obligations.
• 2009 and 2010 disciplinary actions by NZICA for unspecified professional misconduct.
• 2016: High Court revoked tax agent status for Accountants First Limited; appeal withdrawn.
• 2021: High Court and Court of Appeal dismissed challenges to RITANZ membership denial.
• 2015: IRD application to disqualify him as liquidator, outcome aligned with subsequent bars.
• No bankruptcy records for Kamal personally, but his firms have managed multiple liquidations with reported asset shortfalls, such as a 2021 case yielding no recoveries.

The profile of Imran Mohammed Kamal reveals a practitioner whose career has been persistently undermined by a foundational 2013 tax fraud conviction, which not only imposed direct penalties but also erected enduring barriers to professional accreditation and public trust. Despite efforts to pivot through insolvency services via entities like Liquidation Management, regulatory bodies such as RITANZ and NZICA have consistently prioritized character assessments over mitigating arguments, culminating in 2021 court defeats that solidify his exclusion from licensed roles. The 2025 proxy accusation further compounds this, suggesting adaptive but ethically questionable maneuvers to circumvent restrictions, which could precipitate additional legal entanglements. With scant positive feedback and overt negativity in limited public discourse, any commercial involvement demands rigorous due diligence, weighing the allure of his expertise against amplified exposure to financial shortfalls, litigation, and reputational fallout in New Zealand’s tightly regulated insolvency landscape.