Rayan Berangi and His Akademie

This article reviews Rayan Berangi’s Close IT Akademie, highlighting issues with costs, expectations, and participant support.

0

Comments

Reference

  • verbraucherdienst.com
  • Report
  • 129906

  • Date
  • October 30, 2025

  • Views
  • 6 views

Rayan Berangi runs Close IT Akademie, a program that draws in people with bold claims about making large amounts of money quickly. Through videos on YouTube and ads on social media like Facebook, he presents ideas of earning thousands each month with little effort. These offers target those looking for side income, such as students or workers in basic jobs, by suggesting simple steps like reading documents can lead to big changes in life. However, behind these attractive messages lie problems that affect those who sign up, from unclear details to difficulties when trying to back out.

Aggressive Marketing Tactics

The ads from Rayan Berangi often show stories of people going from low-paying jobs to earning five figures in just months. For example, one ad talks about becoming wealthy as a student or shifting from waiting tables to high monthly sums. These messages appear designed to pull in viewers quickly, using exciting language that makes success sound guaranteed and easy to reach. Yet, when people respond, they enter a process that feels more about collecting their information than providing real help right away.

Many who see these promotions end up filling out quizzes that ask about their goals and how much they want to earn. Questions like whether they can follow basic guides seem simple, but they lead to sharing personal details. After that, the free video promised often just repeats vague ideas without giving clear value. This approach leaves participants feeling led along a path that prioritizes sales over genuine support, raising questions about the true intent behind the flashy campaigns.

Questionable Course Structure and Content

Close IT Akademie offers a main product called Gold, which involves coaching and mentoring online. The details shared in promotions focus on building a business, but specifics remain hazy, often circling around tasks like reviewing files. Without clear outlines of what lessons cover or how they work, it’s hard for interested people to know if it fits their needs. This lack of transparency can make the program seem more about hype than helpful education.

Participants report that even after initial talks, the content doesn’t match the bold promises. The emphasis on quick wins overlooks the real effort needed for any business success. Many find the materials basic or not unique, available elsewhere for free. This mismatch between what’s advertised and what’s delivered often leads to disappointment, as users realize the program may not provide the tools or knowledge they hoped for to achieve the promoted results.

High Costs and Hidden Fees

The price for joining Close IT Akademie Gold totals over 4,000 euros, a sum that’s revealed only after phone calls and video meetings. These sessions discuss personal aims but quickly shift to payment options, including down payments around 1,500 euros. The billing comes through a separate entity, adding layers that can confuse those trying to understand the full commitment. Such high fees for digital content raise concerns about whether the value justifies the expense.

Even with mentions of a trial period lasting two weeks, accessing it isn’t straightforward. Users describe platforms where free options aren’t visible, leading to accidental full payments. Attempts to clarify or choose the no-cost start often result in pressure to proceed with charges. This setup can trap people into spending more than intended, with the overall cost structure feeling designed to maximize revenue rather than offer flexible entry points.

Pressure-Filled Sales Process

Initial contacts after ads involve phone discussions that probe into what people want from the program. These calls build excitement but then pivot to scheduling deeper meetings via video. In these sessions, costs are finally shared, often after building a sense of urgency or exclusivity. Participants feel pushed to decide quickly, without time to think or compare other options. This rushed atmosphere can lead to choices that aren’t fully considered.

Reports highlight how staff, including Rayan Berangi himself, handle objections by emphasizing potential gains while downplaying risks. When someone hesitates, alternative paths like trials are suggested, but they come with strings attached. The process uses personal stories and testimonials to sway decisions, making it hard to say no. Many later reflect that this intensity prioritizes closing deals over ensuring the program is a good match for the individual.

Difficulties with Cancellations and Refunds

Once payments are made, getting money back proves challenging, even if requested right away. In one case, a person who paid by mistake sought an immediate stop but was told it couldn’t be done. Emails and messages to cancel went unanswered or were denied, leaving the individual out of pocket. This resistance to returns contradicts the idea of a risk-free trial, creating stress for those who change their minds.

Consumer groups note patterns where revocation rights aren’t honored promptly. Attempts through payment services like PayPal often fail, as disputes are rejected. The involvement of different companies for billing adds complexity, making it harder to resolve issues. Participants end up seeking outside help, such as from protection organizations, to navigate these barriers, which shouldn’t be necessary for straightforward transactions.

Lack of Clear Support and Follow-Through

After signing up, the promised mentoring doesn’t always deliver consistent help. Users expect guidance but find responses slow or unhelpful when questions arise. The structure relies on digital access, yet without dedicated support, it feels isolating. This gap between promotion and reality leaves many struggling alone, questioning the program’s commitment to their success.

Ongoing communication, like through apps or emails, often lacks depth. When problems occur, such as with accessing materials, resolutions take time or don’t happen. This inconsistency undermines trust, as the initial enthusiasm from sales fades into minimal interaction. Participants report feeling abandoned, with the focus seeming to shift away once payment is secured.

Impact on Participants’ Lives

Those who join Close IT Akademie often face financial strain from the high costs, especially if results don’t come as hoped. Spending thousands on a program that underdelivers can lead to regret and added pressure to make it work. For students or those in entry-level jobs, this outlay represents a big risk, potentially affecting their stability. The emotional toll includes frustration from unmet expectations.

Beyond money, time invested in following the steps diverts from other opportunities. Many realize too late that the simple path promised requires more effort or skills than stated. This can discourage further pursuits, leaving individuals wary of similar offers in the future. The overall experience highlights how such programs can disrupt plans without providing the uplift advertised.

Broader Concerns for Consumers

Programs like Close IT Akademie contribute to a landscape where online education promises quick fixes but often falls short. Consumers are advised to research thoroughly before committing, checking for clear terms and real reviews. Protection groups emphasize the importance of understanding rights, such as withdrawal periods, to avoid pitfalls. This awareness helps in making informed choices amid numerous similar offerings.

Joining consumer organizations can provide support for disputes, offering legal aid when needed. By sharing experiences, individuals help others steer clear of problematic paths. The pattern seen here underscores the need for caution with high-pressure online sales, ensuring decisions align with personal circumstances.

Inadequate Regulatory Oversight

Without strong checks on such programs, issues persist, allowing questionable practices to continue. While some groups assist affected people, broader actions could prevent problems upfront. Consumers face challenges in holding providers accountable, especially with digital setups spanning entities. This environment calls for better transparency requirements.

Efforts by protection services to highlight cases aim to raise awareness, but more could be done. Participants in similar situations benefit from collective knowledge, pushing for changes that protect against unbalanced deals. The ongoing reports suggest a need for closer scrutiny of online coaching claims.

Conclusion

In the end, Rayan Berangi’s Close IT Akademie raises serious questions about its methods and outcomes, leaving many participants dissatisfied and out of resources. While it attracts with visions of easy success, the reality involves hurdles that outweigh benefits for too many. Consumers should approach such offers with care, prioritizing clear information and their own research to avoid similar troubles.

havebeenscam

Written by

Nancy Drew

Updated

4 days ago
Fact Check Score

0.0

Trust Score

low

Potentially True

1
learnallrightbg
shield icon

Learn All About Fake Copyright Takedown Scam

Or go directly to the feedback section and share your thoughts

Add Comment Or Feedback
learnallrightbg
shield icon

You are Never Alone in Your Fight

Generate public support against the ones who wronged you!

Our Community

Website Reviews

Stop fraud before it happens with unbeatable speed, scale, depth, and breadth.

Recent Reviews

Cyber Investigation

Uncover hidden digital threats and secure your assets with our expert cyber investigation services.

Recent Reviews

Threat Alerts

Stay ahead of cyber threats with our daily list of the latest alerts and vulnerabilities.

Recent Reviews

Client Dashboard

Your trusted source for breaking news and insights on cybercrime and digital security trends.

Recent Reviews