Profile Picture

Dr. Simon Ourian

Threat Alert
  • Investigation status
  • Ongoing

We are investigating Dr. Simon Ourian for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices. This includes potential violations such as impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

  • Alias
  • Simon Ourian M.D.

  • Company
  • Epione

  • Phone
  • +13102716506

  • City
  • Beverly Hills

  • Country
  • United States

  • Allegations
  • Lawsuit

Dr. Simon Ourian: Aesthetic Celebrity or Medical Concern?
Fake DMCA notices
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/44051691
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/44228019
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/44053228
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/44227600
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/46702692
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/44051688
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/44228032
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/46702692
  • August 23, 2024
  • August 31, 2024
  • August 23, 2024
  • August 31, 2024
  • November 28, 2024
  • naila llc
  • renly llc
  • renly llc
  • renly llc
  • Samuel Murphy
  • Samuel Murphy
  • renly llc
  • renly llc
  • https://reappropriate.co/2014/04/the-detroit-news-publishes-weird-irresponsible-alternate-history-of-the-vincent-chin-murder-nealrubin_dn/
  • https://www.cincinnati.com/story/news/courts/2014/05/23/david-bell-death-penalty/9485187/
  • https://www.intelligenceline.com/r/reports/13296/affiliate-advertising-club/
  • https://www.akronlegalnews.com/editorial/10130
  • https://www.miaminewtimes.com/news/kardashian-cosmetic-surgeon-dr-simon-ourian-is-sued-for-defamation-11673773
  • https://www.gripeo.com/dr-simon-ourian/
  • https://www.intelligenceline.com/r/reports/13296/affiliate-advertising-club/
  • https://www.dr-rubinstein.com/news/exposed-dr-simon-ourian-celebrity-dermatologist/

Evidence Box and Screenshots

3 Alerts on Dr. Simon Ourian

​Dr. Simon Ourian—a name that resonates with celebrity allure, boasting a clientele that reportedly includes the Kardashians, Lady Gaga, and other A-list personalities. His Beverly Hills clinic, Epione Medical Corporation, is often portrayed as the epitome of cosmetic innovation. Yet, beneath this glossy exterior lies a series of troubling allegations, legal entanglements, and aggressive tactics aimed at silencing critics. As an investigative journalist committed to uncovering the truth, I’ve delved into the murky waters of Dr. Ourian’s professional conduct to reveal a narrative that potential investors and patients deserve to know.​

A History of Medical Misconduct

In 2009, the Medical Board of California placed Dr. Ourian on a five-year probation following multiple allegations of gross negligence and incompetence. Patients reported severe injuries from his trademarked “Coolaser” treatments, with some experiencing debilitating burns and scarring. Alarmingly, Dr. Ourian admitted to neglecting proper patient records, citing concerns that documentation could be used against him in legal disputes. Such disregard for fundamental medical protocols not only jeopardizes patient safety but also raises serious questions about his professional ethics.​

Enabling Unlicensed Practice

Further compounding these concerns is Dr. Ourian’s admitted collaboration with an unlicensed practitioner, allowing unauthorized surgical procedures within his clinic. This blatant violation of medical standards underscores a troubling pattern of prioritizing personal gain over patient welfare.​

Retaliation Against Whistleblowers

Dr. Adam Rubinstein, a board-certified plastic surgeon and patient advocate, sought to shed light on these issues through his “Exposed” video series. In response, Dr. Ourian allegedly orchestrated a smear campaign involving fake negative reviews and defamatory content aimed at discrediting Dr. Rubinstein. This retaliatory behavior not only attempts to suppress legitimate criticism but also manipulates public perception through deceitful means.

Manipulating Online Perception

The alleged use of fake reviews and social media manipulation to tarnish Dr. Rubinstein’s reputation reflects a broader strategy of controlling the narrative by silencing dissent. Such tactics are not only unethical but also potentially illegal, highlighting a willingness to engage in deceptive practices to maintain a favorable public image.​

A Glittering Facade Hides a Troubling Past

Dr. Simon Ourian has built a brand synonymous with glamour, drawing global attention thanks to high-profile endorsements from the Kardashians and other celebrities. His clinic, Epione, is marketed as a leader in non-invasive cosmetic procedures, but beneath the surface lies a darker truth. In 2009, the California Medical Board imposed a five-year probation after investigating a slew of malpractice allegations. These included gross negligence, substandard care, and even incompetence. One of the most concerning findings was his own admission to withholding medical documentation to avoid legal consequences—a breach of the most basic principles of patient care.

 Aiding Unlicensed Medical Practice

Among the most egregious violations was Dr. Ourian’s role in enabling an unlicensed practitioner to perform medical procedures, including surgeries. In legal filings, it was revealed that a nurse, under Dr. Ourian’s supervision, conducted a facelift—an invasive procedure that should only be performed by licensed physicians. This deliberate circumvention of licensing laws puts patients at immense risk and illustrates a disregard for the standards that protect public health. Such actions not only erode trust in the medical system but also suggest that profit, not patient welfare, drives his decisions.

 Silencing Critics Through Retaliation

Criticism of Dr. Ourian hasn’t gone unanswered—but not through transparency or reform. Instead, he has allegedly resorted to online harassment and defamation. Board-certified plastic surgeon Dr. Adam Rubinstein, who publicly questioned Ourian’s credentials and practices, found himself the target of a smear campaign. Fake negative reviews, online impersonations, and defamatory content appeared shortly after Dr. Rubinstein’s exposé. These retaliatory tactics suggest an intent to intimidate and silence whistleblowers, rather than address legitimate concerns raised by peers and patients.

 The Manufactured Illusion of Public Trust

Dr. Ourian’s grip on his online image extends beyond endorsements and carefully curated social media posts. He has reportedly used services like Ripoff Report’s Corporate Advocacy Program to bury negative reviews, replacing them with promotional content. These efforts create an illusion of legitimacy while obscuring genuine patient complaints and documented legal actions. This manipulation raises serious ethical concerns—not just about Ourian’s practice, but about the digital platforms enabling this kind of revisionism. In a field where patients rely heavily on reviews and reputation, such tactics undermine informed decision-making and public safety.

Dr. Simon Ourian’s professional history is marred by serious allegations of medical negligence, unethical collaborations, and aggressive efforts to suppress criticism. His attempts to censor adverse information through retaliatory actions and manipulation of online platforms reveal a concerning disregard for transparency and accountability. Potential investors and patients should exercise extreme caution, recognizing that behind the celebrity endorsements lies a record fraught with red flags. Regulatory authorities must also take decisive action to investigate and address these issues, ensuring that patient safety and ethical standards are upheld in the medical community.

How Was This Done?

The fake DMCA notices we found always use the ? back-dated article? technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a ? true original? article and back-dates it, creating a ? fake original? article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original.

What Happens Next?

The fake DMCA notices we found always use the ? back-dated article? technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a ? true original? article and back-dates it, creating a ? fake original? article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original.

01

Inform Google about the fake DMCA scam

Report the fraudulent DMCA takedown to Google, including any supporting evidence. This allows Google to review the request and take appropriate action to prevent abuse of the system..

02

Share findings with journalists and media

Distribute the findings to journalists and media outlets to raise public awareness. Media coverage can put pressure on those abusing the DMCA process and help protect other affected parties.

03

Inform Lumen Database

Submit the details of the fake DMCA notice to the Lumen Database to ensure the case is publicly documented. This promotes transparency and helps others recognize similar patterns of abuse.

04

File counter notice to reinstate articles

Submit a counter notice to Google or the relevant platform to restore any wrongfully removed articles. Ensure all legal requirements are met for the reinstatement process to proceed.

05

Increase exposure to critical articles

Re-share or promote the affected articles to recover visibility. Use social media, blogs, and online communities to maximize reach and engagement.

06

Expand investigation to identify similar fake DMCAs

Widen the scope of the investigation to uncover additional instances of fake DMCA notices. Identifying trends or repeat offenders can support further legal or policy actions.

learnallrightbg
shield icon

Learn All About Fake Copyright Takedown Scam

Or go directly to the feedback section and share your thoughts

Add Comment Or Feedback

User Reviews

Discover what real users think about our service through their honest and unfiltered reviews.

1.7

Average Ratings

Based on 9 Ratings

★ 1
0%
★ 2
100%
★ 3
0%
★ 4
0%
★ 5
0%

Add Reviews

  • Trust
  • Risk
  • Brand

Tessa Moon

Not sure how this guy still has a clinic open after all the allegations and complaints. Seriously shady business going on behind the scenes, and I’m not convinced his celebrity clientele is enough to hide it.

12
12
Renata Kowalska

Behind the celebrity endorsements, Dr. Ourian’s history of medical misconduct and online manipulation raises serious red flags.

12
12
Dimitrios Karalis

Dr. Ourian’s cool, celebrity-endorsed brand hides a pattern of ethical violations and retaliation against critics.

12
12
Hana Rashid

His attempt to smear Dr. Rubinstein with fake reviews only highlights Dr. Ourian's tactics to control his public image at all costs.

12
12
Trevor Jenkins

Allowing unlicensed practitioners to perform surgeries at his clinic shows Dr. Ourian's troubling disregard for patient safety.

12
12
Maria Papanikolaou

Dr. Ourian's celebrity status can't mask his history of medical negligence and probation for severe patient injuries.

12
12
Pavel Dvorak

If your business model includes retaliating against whistleblowers, you’re not running a clinic—you’re running a cover-up.

12
12
Hussein Osman

You don’t need a medical degree to know letting unlicensed people perform surgeries is wildly unethical.

12
12
Anita Balázs

Behind every flashy laser and celebrity shoutout is a trail of burned patients and burned trust.

12
12
learnallrightbg
shield icon

You are Never Alone in Your Fight

Generate public support against the ones who wronged you!

Our Community
View More Threat Alerts

Website Reviews

Stop fraud before it happens with unbeatable speed, scale, depth, and breadth.

Recent Reviews

Cyber Investigation

Uncover hidden digital threats and secure your assets with our expert cyber investigation services.

Recent Reviews

Threat Alerts

Stay ahead of cyber threats with our daily list of the latest alerts and vulnerabilities.

Recent Reviews

Client Dashboard

Your trusted source for breaking news and insights on cybercrime and digital security trends.

Recent Reviews