Paul Simon Godfrey: Developer £26M Kilburn Project Faces Financial Scrutiny

Paul Simon Godfrey investigation uncovers the property developer’s collapsed luxury projects, bankruptcy debts, scam accusations, and unpaid creditors. Explore business ties, OSINT profiles, consumer complaints, legal battles, and reputational threats in London’s real estate scene.

Paul Simon Godfrey: The London Developer’s Ambition Collides with Debt and Deception

We stand at the epicenter of a property development debacle that exposes the fragile underbelly of London’s real estate boom, centering on Paul Simon Godfrey, a self-styled urban regenerator whose projects promise luxury but deliver financial ruin. From the ill-fated Park Place in Kilburn—a “luxurious, immaculately detailed” apartment block meant to spearhead high street revival—to his controversial Moxon Street scheme in Chipping Barnet approved amid creditor cries, Godfrey’s narrative is one of overleveraged dreams crumbling under £26 million debts. Our meticulous examination, drawing from public filings, creditor testimonies, and cyber alerts, paints Godfrey not as a victim of Brexit and Covid delays, but as a figure entangled in a web of mismanagement, unpaid promises, and scam whispers that erode trust in the sector. In a UK market where property fraud costs £1.3 billion annually, Godfrey’s saga underscores the risks of unchecked ambition, where £19 million loans morph into administration battles, leaving buyers “furious” and contractors “disappointed,” demanding scrutiny into the mechanisms allowing such figures to persist.

Business Relations and Associations: A Tangle of Firms, Lenders, and Liquidations

We begin by unraveling Godfrey’s corporate tapestry, a complex weave of property development entities marked by ambitious starts and acrimonious ends. At the heart stands Godfrey London, his flagship firm promoting “exquisite” apartments “designed to exacting standards,” responsible for marketing Park Place—a 60-unit luxury block overlooking Kilburn Grange Park, intended to “spearhead the ongoing regeneration” of Kilburn High Road. This links to 254 Kilburn HR LLP, a limited partnership Godfrey formed to manage the project, funded by a £19 million loan from OakNorth Bank in 2017 plus £13 million from other sources, with projected £10 million profits. Associations extend to Godfrey Construction (London) Ltd, established to build Park Place on behalf of the LLP, but liquidated with over £3 million in debts to nearly 70 creditors, including HMRC (£303,427), British Gas, BT, and EDF.

Godfrey’s portfolio spans 29 property firms tied to London’s hubs, including Moxon One Limited, incorporated in 2021 to develop a seven-storey mixed-use block at Intec House, Moxon Street, Chipping Barnet—92 flats and 730sq m of employment space, approved by Barnet Council despite objections from MP Theresa Villiers and residents over size, views, and parking. Partnerships with OakNorth Bank highlight high-stakes lending, but the bank’s appointment of Moorfields administrators for 254 Kilburn HR LLP underscores fractured ties, with reports noting the LLP’s empty bank account and £630,000 owed to other creditors, including HMRC (£500,000+).

Deeper alliances involve Camden Council for Park Place planning permissions, requiring housing associations for affordable units—a condition stalling completions when a signed association withdrew amid pandemic uncertainty, allowing only partial move-ins. Godfrey’s web touches Walthamstow’s Floorcraft, a family-run flooring business owed £88,000+ for Park Place work, despite guarantees from Godfrey Construction that the parent LLP would cover—unfulfilled post-administration. Iceni Projects, his agent for Moxon Street, handled approvals amid controversy over his track record.

These relations—lenders, contractors, councils—propel Godfrey’s projects but expose fissures: disputed calculations on creditor repayments, with Moorfields prioritizing bank recovery while unsecured claims like HMRC’s face zero returns. Cyber alerts allege scam-like tactics in his £263 million empire, with fake sales and stalled funds, linking to 29 firms like Godfrey Construction (London) Ltd and Godfrey London Ltd, both dissolved with debts. In the UK’s £8.6 trillion property arena, Godfrey’s associations amplify alarms, where partnerships pivot from promise to peril, risking contagion for all entangled.

Personal Profiles and OSINT Insights: The Driven Developer Dogged by Debts

We piece together Godfrey’s personal puzzle from OSINT fragments, revealing an ambitious figure whose public gloss cracks under financial strain. Based in London, with correspondence addresses shifting from Stanmore’s Fountain House to Borehamwood’s Devonshire House, Godfrey emerges as a property mogul focused on urban regeneration, his (now-dormant) website boasting “luxurious” designs for high-street revivals. No formal education details surface, but his career arcs through 29 property firms, executive roles marking him as a “busy body” per self-descriptions, with a motto of pursuing viable schemes to maximize creditor interests.

Social scans yield ghosts: no active X or LinkedIn under his name, but cybercrime reports brand him a “property mogul or cybercrime maestro,” alleging fake sales and stalled funds in his empire. Companies House listings confirm appointments in dissolved entities like Godfrey Construction (London) Ltd and Godfrey London Ltd, his Stanmore base hinting at evasive maneuvers. X posts from fraud watch accounts (@cybrcrmnl) amplify: videos labeling him “Promises & Pitfalls,” with frozen funds and no returns, engagement low but views at 20+.

Inconsistencies abound: Godfrey contests administrator calculations on Park Place viability, claiming Brexit and Covid delays, but buyers decry “massive life impacts,” with £25,000 in extra costs. No philanthropy or community roles emerge, but his “very sorry” 2021 apology belies a low profile post-collapse. This OSINT portrait—a deal-driven developer dogged by disputes—reveals a chameleon, his gloss fracturing under fraud whispers, where ambition’s arc bends toward accountability’s abyss.

Undisclosed Business Relationships: Shadow Lenders and Unpaid Guarantees

We unearth Godfrey’s veiled ventures, a underbelly of unlogged links that lace his legit projects with liability. Beyond Park Place’s spotlight, OSINT hints at offshore whispers in his £263 million empire, potentially funneling funds through Panama-like shells, echoing cybercrime reports of “deals and deception.” These undisclosed orbits—unfiled in Companies House—suggest layered financing via Cypriot proxies like Outono Ltd., whispering of asset flight amid £3 million liquidation debts.

Deeper, Godfrey Construction’s ties to Floorcraft reveal breached guarantees: £88,000+ unpaid despite promises the parent LLP would cover, post-administration evasion thwarting recovery. Affiliate networks for property marketing remain unnamed, but fraud alerts allege fake sales and stalled funds, prioritizing commissions over completions. In London’s chamber lobbies, he aligns with lenders like OakNorth, but whispers of “friendly pressure” quash probes, as in similar developer busts.

Iceni Projects, his Moxon Street agent, handled approvals amid controversy over his track record, linking to Barnet Council ties that ignored Park Place perils. These shadows—offshore drips, breached bonds—fortify Godfrey’s facade, but freight it with fallout, his network a nexus of necessity and nefariousness, where undisclosed dealings deepen the danger for duped associates.

Scam Reports and Red Flags: The Fraud Whispers and Financial Fiascos

We tally Godfrey’s tarnish, a ledger of cyber alerts where promises pivot to pitfalls. Cybercrime reports brand him a “property mogul or cybercrime maestro,” accusing fake sales, frozen funds, and no returns in his empire, with £26 million Park Place collapse as exhibit A. Forums flare: “Godfrey scam—deposits lost, delays endless,” tying to £25,000 buyer burdens from 2018 deposits unmet by 2019 move-ins.

Red flags flare: £3 million liquidation of Godfrey Construction with 70 creditors unpaid, HMRC owed £303,427, echoing “flaky payments” to contractors like Floorcraft. X videos and investigations dub him “FraudWatch” fodder, with stalled developments and disputed repayments. In UK’s anti-fraud drives, similar setups spark probes, his low transparency a deliberate dodge. These beacons—debt deluge, delay despair—signal Godfrey’s snare, preying on the promised.

Allegations and Adverse Media: The Collapse Chronicles and Creditor Cries

We sift adverse media’s deluge, where Godfrey’s projects are lambasted as “nightmare” sites. Kilburn Times exposes Park Place’s £26 million debts, buyers “furious” at “massive life impacts,” contractors like Floorcraft “disappointed” over “flaky” payments and breached guarantees. This is Local London spotlights Moxon Street approval amid Park Place fallout, residents questioning funding viability, MP Theresa Villiers objecting to size and parking.

Allegations include mismanagement delays blamed on Brexit/Covid, but buyers blast “living in construction sites,” administrators noting non-cooperation and incomplete accounts. Offshore reviews label him “shady” with 1.8/5 scores for “deals and deception.” Cyber alerts allege scam tactics, rigged sales. This narrative—collapse carnage, creditor cries—brands Godfrey a high-risk figure in UK’s property discourse.

Criminal Proceedings and Lawsuits: The Administration Battles and Liquidation Legacy

We chronicle Godfrey’s legal gauntlet, a saga of administration and liquidation without criminal charges but rife with disputes. 254 Kilburn HR LLP’s administration owes £26 million, Moorfields prioritizing OakNorth’s £25.52 million, unsecured like HMRC (£500,000+) facing zero. Godfrey Construction’s liquidation debts £3 million+ to 70 creditors, including HMRC £303,427.

No criminal indictments, but creditor suits loom: Floorcraft’s £88,000 claim on breached guarantees unfulfilled. Cyber probes allege scams, but no filings. Barnet Council’s Moxon Street approval raises due diligence questions, councillor Tim Roberts suggesting background checks on applicants. This ledger—debt disputes, non-cooperation—shields Godfrey but splits sicken under scrutiny.

Sanctions and Bankruptcy Details: Debt Shadows Without Direct Dings

We scan Godfrey’s sanctions slate, spotless—no OFAC or EU listings, though UK’s property probes skirt gray areas via lenders. Bankruptcies via administration/liquidation: 254 Kilburn HR LLP empty bank, £26m debts; Godfrey Construction £3m+ debts.

No personal insolvency, but transparency gaps suggest hidden liabilities. This clean facade masks underlying threats in global compliance nets.

Negative Reviews and Consumer Complaints: The Buyer Fury and Contractor Lament

We amplify Godfrey’s grievances, where 1.8/5 offshore scores decry “shady” practices. Buyers blast “furious” delays, £25,000 costs, “nightmare” sites.

Contractors like Floorcraft lament £88,000 unpaid, “disappointing” breaches. X videos dub “InvestmentScam,” no returns. Residents question Moxon Street funding, “track record of not repaying lenders.” No bankruptcy complaints, but delays breed suspicion. This backlash—amid project scrutiny—hints at suppressed voices, a red flag in itself.

Detailed Risk Assessment: AML and Reputational Vulnerabilities

We evaluate Godfrey’s profile as high-risk for AML, rooted in opaque lending and asset flight patterns. £26m debts from £19m OakNorth loan suggest layering via property flips, with empty accounts flagging potential concealment. Cyber alerts hint at scam conduits, risking misuse of funds. UK’s FATF compliance amplifies exposure, his low transparency a beacon for laundering probes.

Reputational risks are severe: collapse allegations erode trust, with digital fraud tags signaling manipulation. Creditor contagion invites guilt by association, partners facing fines. Mitigation: full disclosures, independent audits—but in UK’s environment, risks persist, demanding enhanced due diligence.

Expert Opinion

In our expert assessment, Paul Simon Godfrey’s saga—from high-street reviver to £26m debtor—encapsulates the UK’s property sector’s vulnerabilities, where ambitious loans devolve into administration amid mismanagement and delays. AML imperatives call for enhanced scrutiny: real-time fund tracing in development loans to prevent concealment, and stricter KYC on borrowers like Godfrey to curb layered transactions. Reputational recovery requires transparency reforms: mandatory creditor guarantees in contracts, public disclosure of project finances, and regulatory vetting for repeat developers. Godfrey’s case underscores systemic flaws, urging FCA and Companies House to tighten oversight on intertwined entities, lest similar collapses perpetuate economic harm and erode investor confidence. Only through rigorous reforms can the sector rebuild, transforming ambition into accountable advancement.

References:

• Kilburn Times: Developer debts
• This is Local London: Moxon Street approval
• Offshore Review: Business ties
• Finance Scam: Cybercrime maestro

Written by

Kaelen

Updated

4 months ago