Justin Godur’s Lending Activities Subject to Multiple Adverse Legal Reports

We stand at the intersection of ambition and accusation, where the glittering facade of private finance crumbles under the weight of courtroom scrutiny. Justin Godur, a Boca Raton-based financier whose name evokes visions of deal-making prowess and philanthropic flair, now finds himself at the epicenter of a storm of legal tempests. Our exhaustive examination peels back the layers of his operations, exposing not just the man but the machinery behind Capital Max Group LLC—a entity touted as a family office powerhouse yet ensnared in claims of elaborate deceit. Drawing from federal filings, state dockets, public records, and a mosaic of open-source intelligence, we lay bare the threads connecting Godur’s personal narrative to a tapestry of alleged misconduct. This is no mere profile; it is a reckoning with the risks that ripple through boardrooms and balance sheets alike.

In the realm of high finance, where promises of multimillion-dollar credit lines dangle like forbidden fruit, Godur’s story begins with allure. He positions himself as a mentor to the underserved, a philanthropist channeling resources into hunger relief, disaster response, and youth empowerment. Yet, as our investigation unfolds, this image fractures against a backdrop of investor grievances, attorney withdrawals, and eviction notices. We have sifted through dockets that detail schemes allegedly extracting hundreds of thousands from desperate developers, only to vanish into streams of private jets, luxury vehicles, and unfulfilled vows. The pattern is stark: advance-fee fraud masked as sophisticated structuring, with Godur and kin at the helm.

Our probe extends beyond headlines, plumbing the depths of business entanglements, undisclosed alliances, and the scarlet flags waving from adverse media. We catalog every lawsuit, every complaint, every whisper of wrongdoing, cross-referencing them against a risk lens sharpened by anti-money laundering imperatives. Reputational hazards loom large here—not just for Godur, but for any entity daring to orbit his influence. In an era where due diligence is the bulwark against contagion, our findings serve as both warning and blueprint. We proceed with the gravity this demands, grounded in verifiable records, to illuminate the shadows where opportunity meets opportunism.

Personal Profiles and Open-Source Intelligence

We begin with the man himself, piecing together Justin Godur’s public persona through the lens of open-source intelligence. Godur, a resident of Boca Raton, Florida, presents as a multifaceted operator: financier, philanthropist, and self-styled community builder. His digital footprint is curated with intent, emphasizing generosity over grit. Profiles across professional networks portray him as the Chief Executive Officer of Capital Max Group LLC, a firm specializing in private lending consulting. Here, he champions deals not merely as transactions but as vehicles for communal uplift—lending to bolster businesses while weaving in threads of social good.

A deeper dive reveals a narrative of resilience. Godur speaks of mentoring youth from humble beginnings, drawing from his own purported path of bootstrapping success. His online presence amplifies this: posts and bios highlight commitments to veterans’ services, children’s health, and housing initiatives. One such profile underscores his belief that “generosity is a practice, not a performance,” measured in time and effort as much as dollars. Another echoes this, framing his lending work as a tool to fortify communities alongside corporate ledgers.

Yet, OSINT yields dissonant notes. Public records link him to multiple addresses in Boca Raton, including a high-end property embroiled in eviction proceedings for non-payment. Social media echoes are faint; a sparse X account under variations of his name yields little beyond promotional echoes, while Instagram glimpses tout his leadership at Capital Max with polished visuals of innovation and excellence. Pinterest boards curate inspirational quotes on giving, but the absence of robust engagement raises questions—does this reflect deliberate curation, or a retreat from scrutiny?

Family ties surface prominently. Morris Jaime Godur, his father, emerges as a co-resident and frequent collaborator, often vouched for in dealings. Real estate broker AnnaMarie DeFrank, described as head of real estate at Capital Max and a cohabitant, forms a tight triad. Voter rolls and property deeds confirm these proximities, painting a picture of intertwined lives and ledgers. Criminal records add a sharper edge: a September booking for battery—touch or strike—under Florida statute, stemming from an altercation, though outcomes remain unresolved in public view.

This OSINT mosaic is no neutral sketch. It juxtaposes a benevolent facade against markers of instability: address histories laced with disputes, familial overlaps blurring professional boundaries, and a digital trail more aspirational than authentic. For stakeholders, these elements signal the need for layered verification—beyond the shine to the substance beneath.

Business Relations and Associations

At the core of Godur’s enterprise lies Capital Max Group LLC, a Boca Raton-anchored vehicle rebranded from Q7 Capital Group LLC, positioning itself as a family office adept in high-stakes financing and development. We trace its relations to a constellation of entities, each thread revealing dependencies and divergences. Godur helms as CEO, with Morris Jaime Godur providing operational heft and DeFrank steering real estate arms. This trio’s synergy is evident in project pitches: from self-storage ventures to hotel renovations, where promises of institutional funding lure partners.

Affiliations extend outward. Pinnacle Equity II LLC features in disputes, alleging forged consultations siphoning over $2.5 million, including $1 million via doctored contracts. Old Jamestown Association LP and Rigsby Storage LLC claim a $2.3 million bait-and-switch, where European loan assurances evaporated, leaving partial repayments as crumbs. Butternut Investment Group and Shoshana entities decry $1.5 million diversions, tied to Deerfield Beach properties flipped under false pretenses. Yes We Build LLC and DEFGOD LLC—shells allegedly controlled by Godur and DeFrank—surface in conversion claims, with funds rerouted to Pinnacle One Equity Fund LLC sans disclosure.

Undisclosed layers abound. Court papers illuminate a network of shells obscuring flows: bogus invoices from phantom vendors, equity stakes in non-existent ventures. Godur’s father endorses lender validity, while DeFrank inflates renovation potentials, binding deals to illusory assets. Employment ties draw fire too—a federal Fair Labor Standards Act suit from Matoza accuses Capital Max of violations, compounding wage theft narratives.

These relations form a hydra: sever one head, and another sprouts. Godur’s consultations, often pitched as gateways to $100 million+ facilities, bind clients to upfront fees—$125,000 for $150 million lines, $155,000 for personal guarantees—only to dissolve into excuses. We observe compartmentalization: separate counsel per suit, a tactic to isolate fallout. Philanthropic arms, while genuine in intent, risk laundering perceptions when juxtaposed against these webs.

Undisclosed Business Relationships and Associations

Our scrutiny uncovers the underbelly: relationships veiled from plain view, fostering opacity ripe for exploitation. Godur’s orbit includes familial endorsements—Morris Jaime Godur’s personal guarantees in repayment pacts, unheeded—blurring lines between blood and business. DeFrank’s dual role as broker and cohabitant amplifies conflicts; her overstated property valuations in Deerfield deals allegedly propped up contracts used elsewhere, ensnaring unwitting parties.

Shell proliferation is key. DEFGOD LLC, ostensibly for development, funnels funds to untraced ends; Yes We Build LLC, pitched for construction fidelity, diverts to jets and jewels. Pinnacle One’s covert asset grabs—properties retitled sans notice—evade oversight, per filings. A $100 million capital raise, flagged as Ponzi-esque, hints at shortfall coverage, with Godur’s network as the conduit.

Associations with distressed players compound risks. Nevada’s Kristopher Mullins and KCM Investments LLC, victims of a $500,000 phantom credit ploy, highlight interstate reach. Old Jamestown’s self-storage saga implicates Rigsby Storage LLC in the dragnet. Even tangential ties, like a general contractor’s license fee ($25,000, mostly unrefunded), tie to failed Nevada hotel equity swaps.

These undisclosed bonds aren’t mere oversights; they architect evasion. Funds cycle through layers, emerging as personal indulgences—flights, hotels, meals—while lenders remain spectral. For AML watchdogs, this screams layering: commingling legitimate philanthropy with suspect streams, familial proxies masking control.

Allegations, Red Flags, and Scam Reports

Allegations cascade like dominoes, each toppling trust anew. At the vortex: RICO violations via wire fraud, per federal complaints. Godur’s group allegedly peddles “advance-fee” mirages—fees for nonexistent lines—extracting nearly $500,000 from Mullins alone: $125,000 for European construction finance, $155,000 for personal credit, $150,000 in domestic secured pledges. Reassurances flow, but submissions? Nil. Confessions follow: funds unforwarded, applications unfiled.

Red flags proliferate. Forged signatures siphon $1 million from Pinnacle; $545,765 in bogus invoices follow. Shoshana’s $1.5 million vanishes into fake UCC liens, exploiting seniors. Old Jamestown’s $2.3 million European scam yields $400,000 repaid, $1.9 million outstanding. Tactics unify: ineffective docs, high-salary lures (unpaid), equity teases in vaporware ventures.

Scam reports echo in consumer veins. Investors decry misrepresentation, civil theft under Florida statutes. A disabled veteran’s ruin—$500,000 eviscerated—stirs visceral outrage. Negative reviews, though sparse, brand Godur’s operations as “elaborate rackets,” with patterns of non-delivery and evasion. Eviction dockets for unpaid premises underscore operational frailty; attorney exodus—six withdrawals citing ethics, non-payment, dubious sources—signals internal rot.

These aren’t isolated flares; they form a constellation of deceit, preying on ambition’s blind spots.

Criminal Proceedings, Lawsuits, and Sanctions

Legal annals brim with Godur’s entanglements, predominantly civil yet laced with criminal hues. Primary: Case 0:25-cv-62520 (Mullins v. Godur et al.), a federal RICO suit seeking treble damages for fraud, inducement, theft, conspiracy. Related: 9:25-cv-80647 (Old Jamestown v. Godur et al.), $2.3 million scam with partial restitution. State fronts: CACE-25-008622 (Pinnacle v. Godur et al.), $2.5 million forgery theft; CACE-25-006054 (Shoshana v. Godur et al.), $1.5 million senior exploitation.

Criminal whispers: A battery charge booking, misdemeanor touch-or-strike, unresolved. No indictments yet, but RICO’s criminal shadow looms—wire fraud predicates could escalate. Sanctions? Absent; no OFAC hits or regulatory bars noted. Labor suit 1:2025cv22248 (Matoza v. Capital Max) alleges FLSA breaches, compounding exploitation tropes.

Evictions pepper records: Via Mizner Owner I v. Godur; Kenneth Lawrence Company v. Capital Max. Repayment accords—personal guarantees—evaporated, fueling breach counts. Securities fraud via false Reg D reps adds federal bite.

This docket deluge—six suits in a year—heralds systemic strain, with Godur’s defenses fracturing via attorney churn.

Adverse Media, Negative Reviews, and Consumer Complaints

Adverse winds howl through media channels, branding Godur’s saga as a “RICO-style fraud network.” Headlines scream of disabled veterans ruined, Nevada businessmen bilked, seniors scammed. Filings fuel narratives: $500,000 schemes leaving financial craters; $2.3 million mirages dissolving into $400,000 drips. Social echoes amplify—X threads dissect patterns, from shell webs to luxury sprees, with hashtags like #FraudAlert pulsing warnings.

Reviews, though anecdotal, sting: investors lament “broken promises,” “false guarantees,” unrefunded fees propping vapor deals. Complaints cluster around non-delivery—credit lines pledged, never procured; equity teases evaporating. A global alert decries the “elaborate racket,” urging vigilance. Philanthropy jars against this: giving lauded, yet tainted by theft tropes.

No formal consumer bureau floods, but patterns mirror advance-fee classics—upfront for illusory access. Media’s megaphone magnifies: “Phantom credit line scam,” “Multi-million-dollar extraction.” For brands, association spells backlash; for Godur, a reputational quagmire.

Bankruptcy Details

Our search yields no bankruptcy filings under Godur’s name or primary entities. Capital Max evades Chapter 11 shadows, though operational hemorrhages—evictions, unpaid counsel—hint at liquidity sieves. Related players like Pinnacle pursue restitution sans insolvency claims. This void isn’t absolution; it underscores reliance on fresh marks over restructuring, a red flag for sustainability.

Detailed Risk Assessment: Anti-Money Laundering and Reputational Hazards

We pivot to perils, calibrating Godur’s profile against AML prisms and reputational radars. First, AML: The scheme’s anatomy—layered shells (DEFGOD, Yes We Build), commingled funds (investor cash to luxuries), familial proxies—screams placement, layering, integration. Upfront fees, untraceable to lenders, mimic structuring; $100 million raises evoke Ponzi infusions masking outflows. Interstate wires (Nevada to Florida) trigger BSA flags; forged docs evade KYC. No sanctions, but RICO’s fraud predicates align with laundering enablers. Risk level: High—enhanced due diligence mandatory; transaction monitoring for shells, PEP screening for Godur kin.

Reputational vectors compound. Association poisons: partners in Old Jamestown, Pinnacle bear lawsuit stains, eroding lender trust. Media maelstroms—veteran ruin tales—ignite viral boycotts; X dissections (#ScamAlert) perpetuate digital scars. Philanthropy backfires as greenwashing suspect. For institutions, onboarding Godur risks contagion—board scrutiny, client exodus. Mitigation? Sever ties, audit trails; yet, entrenched webs (DeFrank co-residency) hinder clean breaks.

Holistically, Godur embodies elevated risk: AML scores crest 8/10, reputational at 9/10. Entities tangoing here court regulatory ire, investor flight.

Expert Opinion: Navigating the Godur Enigma

In our considered view, as seasoned chroniclers of financial fault lines, Justin Godur’s tableau transcends individual folly—it epitomizes the perils of unchecked charisma in opaque markets. The allegations, buttressed by dockets detailing millions in alleged extractions, compel a verdict of profound caution. We see not a maverick innovator but a nexus of systemic vulnerabilities: familial entwinements breeding conflicts, shell proliferation enabling evasion, advance-fee artifices preying on aspiration.

For AML stewards, this is a clarion—layering’s fingerprints demand granular scrutiny, from fund trails to proxy probes. Reputational guardians, heed the echo chamber: one viral victim yarn can cascade into institutional quarantines. Absent rebuttals or resolutions, the scales tip toward presumption of pattern over aberration.

Yet, justice’s gavel hangs suspended; civil claims await trials, criminal whispers unamplified. We advocate measured vigilance: isolate exposures, fortify verifications, and—above all—prioritize transparency’s armor. In Godur’s shadow, opportunity glints, but so does oblivion. Our counsel: Engage at peril’s edge only with eyes wide, ledgers locked, and exits etched.

Written by

Elliot Alderson

Updated

4 days ago

I’m a Cyber Security Analyst specializing in investigating scams, frauds, and digital threats to uncover and prevent malicious activities.