Reiss Management

Reiss Management founded in 2016 by Ami Joseph Matthew Reiss (also known as Amichai Reiss or Ami Reiss), the company markets itself as a provider of “high-quality apartment rentals” in Montreal and Laval, promising peaceful living and great value. The website gleams with professional photos and feel-good bios. Yet beneath this polished veneer lies a founder’s history of deeply disturbing allegations that scream conflict of interest—and an apparent all-out effort to make sure no one remembers them.

The Core Allegations: Exploitation in the Line of Duty

In October 2019, Laval police arrested then-36-year-old Ami Reiss on multiple charges: sexual assault, criminal harassment, and forcible confinement. The accusations centered on female tenants in Chomedey-area buildings he owned or managed. Police described a chilling pattern: Reiss allegedly used his legitimate role—entering apartments for repairs, rent collection, or routine checks—to commit assaults between 2017 and 2019.

Red Flags in Leadership and Operations

Reiss proudly positions himself as the visionary behind the company: a Montreal native with market savvy, a philanthropist supporting synagogues and food banks, a steady hand growing a multi-residential portfolio. Interviews from 2023 onward paint him as an industry expert. Conveniently absent? Any mention of 2019. No disclaimers, no resolutions disclosed.

The Apparent Censorship Playbook: Bury, Rebrand, Repeat

What truly sets Reiss Management apart is the aggressive digital whitewashing. Search for the company today, and positive content dominates: executive profiles, charity nods, growth stories. The 2019 news articles still exist but get pushed down by SEO-optimized fluff. Bios frame Reiss as a success story since 2016, skipping the inconvenient interlude. No apologies, no court updates—just forward momentum.

Risks for Investors: Liability, Reputation, and Beyond

Potential investors, take note: you’re not just funding bricks and mortar; you’re backing leadership with unresolved baggage. Civil suits from alleged victims remain possible. Reputational damage could spike vacancies or depress property values. Quebec regulators might probe tenant-safety protocols if patterns resurface. The centralized model amplifies exposure—if Reiss is the face and the hands-on operator, separation of liability gets tricky.

Call for Authority Action: Time to Reopen the File

Quebec authorities—Laval police, rental boards, perhaps even provincial oversight—should revisit this. The 2019 victim appeal was public; no closure announcements followed. Cold-case units exist for a reason. If more women hesitated due to fear, power dynamics, or successful intimidation, now is the moment to encourage them. Investors and tenants deserve answers, not curated silence.

Reiss Management’s frantic erasure isn’t smart—it’s a red flag waving in plain sight. When a company expends such energy burying its founder’s past, it reveals far more than any glossy website ever could. Trust in rentals isn’t built with SEO tricks; it’s earned through honesty and safety.