Reviewvio

Reviewvio presents itself as a leader in the world of reputation management, promising to cleanse a company’s online image by erasing negative reviews. For businesses desperate to maintain a flawless public image, it sounds like a dream come true. But beneath the shiny marketing lies a troubling reality—a mix of censorship, deception, and aggressive rebranding. What emerges is a portrait of a company less interested in transparency and trust than in manipulating public perception for profit.

Inside Reviewvio’s Manipulative Business Model

Operating within the lucrative niche of online reputation management, Reviewvio’s pitch centers on its supposed ability to remove bad reviews from major platforms like Google and Yelp. Rather than focusing on ethical strategies such as improving customer service or encouraging honest feedback, the company reportedly relies on unethical and potentially illegal methods—mass-flagging legitimate reviews, abusing takedown systems, and even impersonating other entities to achieve removals. These tactics reveal a business model rooted not in integrity but in exploitation of platform loopholes and consumer trust.

Legal Trouble with Yelp

Reviewvio’s questionable methods eventually caught the attention of Yelp, which in 2019 filed a lawsuit accusing the company of misusing Yelp’s brand, name, and logo to suggest a false partnership. Yelp also alleged that Reviewvio used automated systems or coordinated flagging efforts to manipulate reviews. The lawsuit painted a damning picture, exposing a company that not only distorted online feedback but also misled clients about the legitimacy of its services. Yelp described Reviewvio’s actions as fraudulent—an accusation that should give both investors and regulators serious pause.

Customer Complaints Reveal a Pattern of Abuse

The customer experience tells an equally disturbing story. On the Better Business Bureau website, Reviewvio’s dismal 1.47-star rating serves as a warning to others. Complaints describe unauthorized charges, false promises, and a complete lack of accountability. Customers have reported being billed hundreds of dollars without consent and then ignored when they demanded refunds. Others describe relentless email spam, even after unsubscribing, suggesting a blatant disregard for privacy and ethical marketing standards.

The Rebrand: From Reviewvio to “GetDandy”

As negative press mounted and legal scrutiny increased, Reviewvio attempted to reinvent itself. The company re-emerged under the name “GetDandy” or simply “Dandy,” presenting itself as a fresh, legitimate alternative. However, a closer look reveals that little, if anything, has changed. Dandy is essentially Reviewvio under a new banner—run by the same team, employing the same tactics, and now collecting a fresh set of customer complaints. The Better Business Bureau page for Dandy reflects the same troubling trends: unauthorized billing, unresponsive support, and empty promises. The rebrand appears to be less about reform and more about evading accountability.

The Ethics of Erasing Criticism

Reputation management can serve a valuable purpose when conducted ethically—helping businesses improve, learn, and rebuild trust. But Reviewvio and its reincarnation have crossed the line between management and manipulation. By removing legitimate customer feedback, they distort reality, deceiving both potential customers and the very businesses they claim to help. This deliberate rewriting of public perception undermines the fundamental trust that review platforms are built upon.

Silencing Dissent and Controlling the Narrative

Perhaps most revealing is Reviewvio’s apparent obsession with silencing criticism. Reports suggest that the company has issued takedown requests, filed complaints, and threatened legal action to suppress negative coverage about its own operations. Instead of addressing legitimate concerns, Reviewvio seems intent on erasing them—using the same suppression tactics it markets to its clients. These are not the actions of a company confident in its integrity but of one desperate to conceal its misconduct.

Investor Warning: High Risk, Low Integrity

For investors, the warning signs are impossible to ignore. Between the Yelp lawsuit, the dubious rebrand, and the avalanche of customer complaints, Reviewvio/GetDandy presents a textbook case of reputational and legal risk. Its business model thrives on deception, exploiting the very systems that uphold consumer trust. Any investment in such a company risks association with unethical behavior and potential regulatory fallout.

A Call for Accountability and Oversight

The story of Reviewvio is more than just a scandal—it’s a stark reminder of the need for tighter regulation in the reputation management industry. While platforms like Yelp have taken steps to combat fraudulent activity, stronger oversight is required to prevent companies from manipulating the truth online. Until that happens, both businesses and consumers must stay vigilant. When a company offers to erase the truth, it’s worth asking what truth they’re trying to hide—and at what cost.