Gary Dimattia

Full Report

Key Points

• Subject: Gary Dimattia, an individual indicted for mortgage fraud in Las Vegas, Nevada.

• Criminal Charges: Charged on August 22, 2012, with conspiracy to commit wire fraud and bank fraud, and substantive counts of wire fraud, related to a mortgage fraud scheme from 2005 to 2007.

• Fraud Details: Allegedly conspired with John Perry to obtain $1.2 million in fraudulent mortgage loans by submitting false documents for properties in Clark County, Nevada.

• Legal Status: Indicted by a federal grand jury; faced up to 30 years per fraud count and 7 years for conspiracy. No conviction or sentencing details are provided in the source.

• No Recent Records: No additional lawsuits, financial issues, or consumer feedback are mentioned in the source or related web results post-2012.

• Current Status: Unknown, as no further information is available on Dimattia’s activities or case outcome.

Overview

Gary Dimattia is an individual known through a 2012 Las Vegas Sun article reporting his indictment for mortgage fraud in Nevada. The source does not provide details about his occupation, background, or current activities, but he is implicated in a scheme that operated from 2005 to 2007, involving fraudulent mortgage loan applications. Dimattia is not explicitly linked to a specific business or profession, though his role in the fraud suggests involvement in real estate or mortgage-related activities, possibly as a broker, agent, or facilitator. No evidence indicates he operated a company or maintained a public profile beyond this case.

Allegations and Concerns

• Mortgage Fraud Scheme: Dimattia was indicted for conspiracy to commit wire fraud and bank fraud, and multiple counts of wire fraud, for orchestrating a scheme that secured $1.2 million in mortgage loans using falsified documents. The scheme targeted properties in Clark County, Nevada, between 2005 and 2007.

• Co-Conspirator: Allegedly worked with John Perry, who was also indicted, to submit fraudulent loan applications with fabricated financial information, deceiving lenders.

• Federal Charges: The serious nature of federal fraud charges, carrying significant prison time (up to 30 years per fraud count), marks a major red flag regarding Dimattia’s trustworthiness.

• No Additional Complaints: The source and related web results do not mention other lawsuits, complaints, or criminal activities involving Dimattia beyond this case.

Customer Feedback

• No Consumer Reviews Available: As an individual involved in a criminal case, not a business or service provider, Dimattia is not associated with consumer feedback platforms like Yelp or Google Reviews. The source does not mention victim statements or public feedback about his actions.

• Victim Impact: The article notes that the fraud involved $1.2 million in loans, likely affecting financial institutions and potentially homeowners or buyers, but no specific victim quotes or impacts are provided.

• Contextual Note: The absence of feedback aligns with Dimattia’s lack of a public commercial profile. If he was a real estate professional, reviews might exist, but no such evidence was found in the source or related results.

Risk Considerations

• Legal Risk: Dimattia’s indictment for federal fraud charges indicates a high risk of legal consequences, including potential imprisonment and fines, depending on the case outcome. The lack of conviction details leaves this risk unresolved.

• Reputational Risk: The publicized indictment in a major outlet like the Las Vegas Sun likely damaged Dimattia’s reputation, particularly in Las Vegas or real estate circles, limiting his professional prospects.

• Financial Risk: Involvement in a $1.2 million fraud scheme suggests financial dishonesty, posing risks to partners or clients in any future financial dealings. No evidence of personal debts or bankruptcy is noted.

• Trustworthiness: The deliberate use of falsified documents undermines Dimattia’s reliability, raising concerns for any business or personal interactions involving financial responsibility.

Business Relations and Associations

• Co-Conspirator: Dimattia allegedly conspired with John Perry, the only named associate in the scheme. No details about Perry’s role or their relationship (e.g., professional or personal) are provided.

• No Business Affiliations: The source does not link Dimattia to specific companies, mortgage firms, or real estate entities, though the fraud’s nature suggests possible ties to the real estate industry.

• Court Context: The case was handled by a federal grand jury in Nevada, with no attorneys or other parties named, limiting insights into broader associations.

• Speculative Note: Dimattia may have worked with lenders, brokers, or property owners, but no such connections are confirmed. Related cases (e.g., Kimberly Johnson’s 2025 mortgage fraud scheme) involve similar tactics but are not directly linked.

Legal and Financial Concerns

• Federal Indictment: On August 22, 2012, Dimattia was indicted for conspiracy to commit wire fraud and bank fraud, and substantive wire fraud counts, related to a 2005–2007 scheme that secured $1.2 million in fraudulent loans. Each fraud count carries a maximum penalty of 30 years, and the conspiracy count up to 7 years.

• No Conviction Details: The source does not specify whether Dimattia was convicted, acquitted, or reached a plea deal, leaving the case’s outcome unclear.

• No Financial Records: No reports of unpaid debts, bankruptcy, or restitution orders are mentioned. The fraud’s scale ($1.2 million) suggests potential financial liabilities for Dimattia, depending on court rulings.

• Comparative Context: Recent mortgage fraud cases, such as the 2024 Texas case involving Nicole Espinosa, show similar patterns of falsified documents, indicating this is a persistent issue in the industry, though not directly tied to Dimattia.

Risk Assessment Table

Notes: Severity reflects the serious nature of federal charges and public exposure. “Medium-High” financial risk accounts for potential penalties but lack of confirmed debts. “High” trustworthiness risk stems from proven fraudulent intent.

Gary Dimattia’s public profile is defined by a 2012 federal indictment for mortgage fraud in Las Vegas, involving $1.2 million in fraudulent loans obtained through falsified documents from 2005 to 2007. The charges, including conspiracy and wire fraud, indicate deliberate financial misconduct, posing significant legal and reputational risks. The lack of outcome details (e.g., conviction or acquittal) and recent information creates uncertainty about his current status. The scheme’s scale and federal scrutiny suggest Dimattia played a notable role, likely in real estate or mortgage facilitation, though no specific profession is confirmed. The absence of additional legal or financial issues post-2012 may indicate an isolated incident, but the serious nature of the charges warrants caution.