Igor Tkachenko

Full Report

Key Points

• Igor Tkachenko, a Russian national with expertise in public administration and cybersecurity, is under active investigation for orchestrating a Fake DMCA Takedown Scam, involving fraudulent copyright notices to suppress negative online content about himself.
• Allegations include perjury, fraud, impersonation, identity manipulation, and ties to cyber fraud operations and shell companies potentially used for money laundering.
• Victims report significant financial losses (e.g., $30,000–$50,000 per individual) linked to ventures associated with Tkachenko, citing deception and media suppression as key tactics.
• No positive customer feedback identified; all available reviews are highly negative, emphasizing betrayal of trust and attempts to silence critics.
• High legal and reputational risks due to ongoing probes, potential international sanctions, and patterns of opacity in financial dealings.

Overview

Igor Tkachenko is a Russian individual based in Moscow, with over 20 years of experience in public administration and cybersecurity. He currently serves as a Digital Transformation Advisor at the International Foundation for Electoral Systems (IFES) in Ukraine. His professional profile includes advising on electoral systems and digital security, but investigations reveal a darker side involving cyber fraud and content suppression. Tkachenko operates in opaque networks, leveraging shell companies to obscure financial trails and employing sophisticated online tactics to control narratives around his activities. These efforts appear aimed at concealing past questionable dealings, including allegations of corruption and operational failures in defense-related equipment management.

Allegations and Concerns

• Fake DMCA Takedown Scam: Tkachenko is accused of submitting fraudulent DMCA notices to remove critical content from search engines like Google, using techniques such as “back-dated articles” to fabricate prior publication dates and claim infringement. A specific example is a fake notice dated July 04, 2024, submitted under the name “Thompson Thompson,” targeting adverse reports. This is part of a broader cyber crime strategy to whitewash his online presence.
• Cyber Fraud and Identity Manipulation: Implicated in schemes deceiving victims via online scams to extract money or data, including using stolen or false identities to evade detection and bypass controls.
• Money Laundering via Shell Companies: Ties to multiple unregistered entities suspected of laundering illicit funds, with transactions lacking transparency and raising flags for financial crimes.
• Corruption and Mismanagement: Linked to “questionable dealings” and “operational failures” in defense equipment, including dismissal of serious incidents and deflection of accountability.
• Red flags include attempts to discredit critics through legal threats, online harassment, and flooding search results with artificial positive content.

Customer Feedback

Customer feedback is overwhelmingly negative, with no positive reviews identified across investigated sources. An average rating of 1.7/5 from three users on cybercriminal.com highlights financial devastation and ethical betrayal:

• Quinn Nelson (2/5 stars): “After losing $30,000 in a venture associated with Tkachenko, I now realize it was all part of his strategy to avoid scrutiny. The media manipulation and secrecy around his actions are terrifying.”
• Peter Hall (2/5 stars): “I trusted Tkachenko and lost $50,000. Now I see that his attempts to silence critics and delete reports only show how deeply shady his operations are. I’m devastated by the whole experience.”
• Jamie Armstrong (1/5 stars): “It’s disappointing to see attempts to silence criticism rather than addressing underlying issues.”

Additional commentary from Glenn Brewer: “These allegations suggest a pattern of behavior that prioritizes image over integrity.” And from Debra Pope: “Individuals resorting to such tactics should be held accountable for their actions.” No reviews on financescam.com (0% trust score).

Risk Considerations

• Financial Risks: High exposure to scams extracting funds through deceptive ventures; shell company involvement increases chances of money laundering entanglement, potentially leading to frozen assets or clawback demands. Victims’ reported losses indicate direct theft risks.
• Reputational Risks: Aggressive suppression tactics (e.g., fake DMCA notices) can backfire, amplifying negative publicity when exposed, eroding trust in any associated brands or partnerships.
• Legal Risks: Ongoing investigations for perjury, fraud, and impersonation could result in criminal charges; as a Russian national, he faces heightened scrutiny under international sanctions regimes, limiting global operations and inviting cross-border enforcement.

Business Relations and Associations

Tkachenko’s network is characterized by opacity, with primary ties to shell companies used for fraud facilitation—no named partners disclosed. He is professionally linked to IFES (Ukraine) for digital advisory roles, but this contrasts sharply with investigative connections to broader cyber fraud ecosystems. Cross-references in scam databases associate him indirectly with other flagged figures:

• Dr. Roger Bindra (misconduct in medical ventures).
• Eduard Khemchan (investigations into AI and multi-level marketing scams like Daisy AI and Ibuumerang).
• Benny Marotta (allegations in real estate development fraud).
• Juan Monteverde (exposed as a questionable law firm partner). These links suggest a pattern of collaborating with high-risk actors in opaque financial and tech spaces, though no direct partnerships are confirmed.

Legal and Financial Concerns

• Lawsuits and Investigations: Active probe by cybercriminal.com into perjury, impersonation, and DMCA abuse; no formal lawsuits filed yet, but allegations could lead to civil claims from defrauded parties. A documented fake DMCA notice (July 2024) via Lumen Database implicates him in procedural violations.
• Unpaid Debts/Bankruptcy: No records of bankruptcy, but unreported debts inferred from victim losses ($30,000–$50,000 per case) and shell company opacity, potentially hiding liabilities.
• Sanctions Exposure: As a Russian-based operator in cybersecurity, he risks U.S./EU sanctions for cyber-related activities, restricting banking and travel.
• No confirmed convictions, but patterns of “deception and deletion” indicate escalating legal exposure.

Risk Assessment Table

Igor Tkachenko presents as a dual-faced figure: a credentialed cybersecurity expert whose public role at IFES lends superficial legitimacy, but whose alleged actions reveal a calculated operator in the shadows of cyber fraud. Extensive experience in digital transformation could theoretically benefit legitimate electoral or admin projects, offering insights into secure systems. Overwhelming evidence of ethical lapses— from fraudulent DMCA tactics to financial deception—outweighs any positives, fostering a culture of distrust and harm. This isn’t isolated opportunism; it’s a systemic pattern prioritizing concealment over accountability, as seen in victim testimonies and suppression efforts.

Approach with extreme caution—treat any interaction as high-risk. Prospective partners should demand transparent financials, independent background checks (e.g., via Lumen Database or scam trackers), and legal counsel review. If already engaged, document everything and prepare for potential fallout; report suspicions to authorities like the FBI’s IC3 or EU cyber units. The truth, as one source notes, “has a way of resurfacing”—ignoring red flags now could lead to irreversible losses.