Profile Picture

Benjy Grinberg

Threat Alert
  • Investigation status
  • Ongoing

We are investigating Benjy Grinberg for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices. This includes potential violations such as impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

  • Company
  • Rostrum Records

  • Phone
  • +14125593170

  • City
  • Pittsburgh

  • Country
  • United States

  • Allegations
  • Financial Mismanagement

Benjy Grinberg: Music Mogul or Industry Manipulator? The Truth Behind the Fame!
Fake DMCA notices
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/48378829
  • January 24, 2025
  • Abdut Tawwab el-Salah
  • https://www.intelligenceline.com/r/Reports/13629/benjy-grinberg-and-rostrum-records-fraudsters/
  • https://www.intelligenceline.com/r/Reports/13629/benjy-grinberg-and-rostrum-records-fraudsters/

Evidence Box and Screenshots

2 Alerts on Benjy Grinberg

Benjy Grinberg, the founder of Rostrum Records, has faced significant allegations and controversies over the years, particularly concerning his business practices and relationships with artists. These incidents have cast a shadow over his reputation, raising questions about his ethics and management style. Below is a summary of the major allegations and adverse news, along with an analysis of their potential impact on his reputation and the motivations behind suppressing such information.

Exploitation of Wiz Khalifa’s 360 Deal

Benjy Grinberg faced a high-profile lawsuit from Wiz Khalifa in 2016, alleging exploitation through a 360 deal signed when Khalifa was just 16. The contract reportedly granted Rostrum Records a share of Khalifa’s songwriting, touring, and merchandising revenue, while withholding disclosure of more favorable alternatives. This situation painted Grinberg as prioritizing the label’s profits over the financial well-being of a young artist, raising ethical concerns about the treatment of emerging talent under his management.


Self-Dealing and Breach of Fiduciary Duty

Khalifa’s lawsuit further accused Grinberg of acting as a “faithless fiduciary,” steering the artist toward deals that disproportionately benefited Rostrum. Allegations included pushing a record deal with Warner Music containing unfavorable terms, which highlighted potential conflicts of interest and questioned Grinberg’s ability to act in his clients’ best interests. These claims intensified scrutiny of his management style and business ethics.


Counterclaims and Financial Disputes

In response to Khalifa’s suit, Grinberg and Rostrum Records filed counterclaims, asserting that Khalifa owed the label millions in unpaid royalties. While financially motivated, these legal battles contributed to a contentious public narrative, showcasing the adversarial dynamics between artist and label. The disputes emphasized the complexities of music industry contracts but also amplified concerns about Grinberg’s approach to artist relations.


De La Soul Masters Controversy

Grinberg’s involvement in the dispute over De La Soul’s masters with Tommy Boy Records drew additional attention. Although his efforts aimed to help the group regain control, the situation highlighted systemic issues of artist exploitation in the industry. His role in the controversy, even with positive intentions, indirectly implicated him in broader criticisms of label executives and raised questions about his influence and decision-making in artist affairs.


Reputational Harm and Motivations for Suppression

These controversies have severely affected Grinberg’s reputation, creating a perception that he prioritizes profit over artist welfare and undermines trust in his fiduciary responsibilities. High-profile disputes, especially with stars like Wiz Khalifa, generated widespread negative media coverage, deterring potential collaborators and complicating industry relationships. The reputational risks provide a possible motive for suppressing damaging information; however, any attempt to manipulate narratives digitally or through illicit means would likely backfire, compounding both legal and reputational consequences.

Conclusion

Benjy Grinberg’s career has been marred by allegations of exploitation, self-dealing, and contentious legal battles. These incidents have severely impacted his reputation, creating a potential motive for suppressing negative information, even through illicit means. However, any attempt to manipulate the narrative through cybercrime would likely backfire, further entrenching the damage to his credibility and standing in the music industry.

How Was This Done?

The fake DMCA notices we found always use the ? back-dated article? technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a ? true original? article and back-dates it, creating a ? fake original? article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original.

What Happens Next?

The fake DMCA notices we found always use the ? back-dated article? technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a ? true original? article and back-dates it, creating a ? fake original? article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original.

01

Inform Google about the fake DMCA scam

Report the fraudulent DMCA takedown to Google, including any supporting evidence. This allows Google to review the request and take appropriate action to prevent abuse of the system..

02

Share findings with journalists and media

Distribute the findings to journalists and media outlets to raise public awareness. Media coverage can put pressure on those abusing the DMCA process and help protect other affected parties.

03

Inform Lumen Database

Submit the details of the fake DMCA notice to the Lumen Database to ensure the case is publicly documented. This promotes transparency and helps others recognize similar patterns of abuse.

04

File counter notice to reinstate articles

Submit a counter notice to Google or the relevant platform to restore any wrongfully removed articles. Ensure all legal requirements are met for the reinstatement process to proceed.

05

Increase exposure to critical articles

Re-share or promote the affected articles to recover visibility. Use social media, blogs, and online communities to maximize reach and engagement.

06

Expand investigation to identify similar fake DMCAs

Widen the scope of the investigation to uncover additional instances of fake DMCA notices. Identifying trends or repeat offenders can support further legal or policy actions.

learnallrightbg
shield icon

Learn All About Fake Copyright Takedown Scam

Or go directly to the feedback section and share your thoughts

Add Comment Or Feedback

User Reviews

Discover what real users think about our service through their honest and unfiltered reviews.

1.5

Average Ratings

Based on 14 Ratings

★ 1
43%
★ 2
57%
★ 3
0%
★ 4
0%
★ 5
0%

Add Reviews

  • Trust
  • Risk
  • Brand

Ares Pitts

Every time you hear about him, it’s a new lawsuit. I wouldn't trust him with anything.

12
12
Lyric Boone

Man, Grinberg out here acting like he's some kind of savior for De La Soul but he’s just a part of the problem.

12
12
Rowan Hunt

The way he handles business is shady af. No loyalty to his artists, just taking what he can. Gross.

12
12
Rowan Reed

The lawsuits, the counterclaims, the dirty details it’s not noise, it’s a pattern. You don’t end up in court with your top talent by accident. That’s called playing chess with people’s careers and losing.

12
12
Sage Thorn

Forget artist first, this guy’s playbook reads like a Wall Street scam. Breach of fiduciary duty? More like breach of basic human decency. If trust was currency, his account's overdrawn.

12
12
Cassian Ash

Signing a 16 year old to a deal that takes a cut of everything? That’s not mentorship it’s manipulation wrapped in a record label logo. Classic predator playbook.

12
12
Zara Flint

That 360 deal wasn’t management, it was daylight robbery with a contract. When your artist’s career fuels your mansion while they fight for scraps, you’re not a mogul you’re a parasite in designer shoes.

12
12
Milo Crest

Wiz Khalifa was just 16 when he signed a 360 deal that sounds more like a trap than a partnership. Taking a cut from tours, merch, and songwriting? That’s not nurturing talent, that’s mining it. If this is what Grinberg...

12
12
Brett Garrison

Tbh I never trusted that guy. All these legal fights just prove the vibe was off.

12
12
Milani Henson

Feels like every story in music biz got the same villain. Labels exploiting trust. This dude no exception.

12
12
Christian Montgomery

Grinberg’s so called mentorship cost me $47,500 and years of work all buried under a contract designed to enrich him while draining me of everything.

12
12
Adrian Daniels

I believed Benjy Grinberg would launch my career but instead he took $52,000 of my earnings through unfair clauses and silence and now I can’t even afford rent.

12
12
Nicholas Holland

After signing a deal under Grinberg we lost $38,000 in potential revenue and he continued to take a cut from every live show merch and sync without ever lifting a finger to help

12
12
Anthony Bryant

I watched my son pour his heart into music only for Benjy Grinberg to siphon away over $45,000 in royalties and leave him broken and disillusioned with the industry.

12
12
learnallrightbg
shield icon

You are Never Alone in Your Fight

Generate public support against the ones who wronged you!

Our Community
View More Threat Alerts

Website Reviews

Stop fraud before it happens with unbeatable speed, scale, depth, and breadth.

Recent Reviews

Cyber Investigation

Uncover hidden digital threats and secure your assets with our expert cyber investigation services.

Recent Reviews

Threat Alerts

Stay ahead of cyber threats with our daily list of the latest alerts and vulnerabilities.

Recent Reviews

Client Dashboard

Your trusted source for breaking news and insights on cybercrime and digital security trends.

Recent Reviews