Profile Picture

Netview Trading

  • Investigation status
  • Ongoing

We are investigating Netview Trading for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices. This includes potential violations such as impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

  • Alias
  • Netview

  • Company
  • Netview Trading

  • Phone
  • +27 78 699 7297

  • City
  • Johannesburg

  • Country
  • South Africa

  • Allegations
  • Forex investment fraud

Netview Trading
Fake DMCA notices
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/50431705
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/50431776
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/50540474
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/50542630
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/51648027
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/52949944
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/52951617
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/52910660
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/52703657
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/52858099
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/52797531
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/52817623
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/52467946
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/52700141
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/52717696
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/52661515
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/52663546
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/52687781
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/52638556
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/52641109
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/52548503
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/52196141
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/52296836
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/51657651
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/51532936
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/51700379
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/50854895
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/50543310
  • March 30, 2025
  • March 30, 2025
  • April 02, 2025
  • May 05, 2025
  • June 06, 2025
  • June 04, 2025
  • June 07, 2025
  • May 27, 2025
  • June 03, 2025
  • May 31, 2025
  • June 02, 2025
  • June 02, 2025
  • May 28, 2025
  • June 01, 2025
  • June 02, 2025
  • May 28, 2025
  • May 29, 2025
  • May 05, 2025
  • May 02, 2025
  • April 11, 2025
  • April 02, 2025
  • Максим Горюнов
  • Michael Wilson
  • Michael Wilson
  • Максим Горюнов
  • Abraham Wilcox
  • Isreal Hessel
  • Solomon Harrington
  • Bryan Franklin
  • Abigail Kuhn
  • Daniel Scartoff
  • Alexina Webb
  • Marth Blick
  • Susan Fisher
  • Barbara Harmon
  • Debra Price
  • Keena Bernhard
  • Bruce Watson
  • Irma McKenzie
  • Morito Pizzichini
  • Wendy Brown
  • Suzanne Perez
  • Victoria Ramirez
  • Harvey Parker
  • Leslie Chandler
  • [REDACTED]
  • Arkady Nemerovsky
  • Petr Biryukov
  • Alexey Vosyanov
  • https://telegra.ph/Netview-Trading-03-30-3
  • https://telegra.ph/Netviewtrading-httpnetviewtradingcom-lzhebroker-Otzyv-Telltrue-03-30-2
  • https://telegra.ph/Netview-Trading-04-02-3
  • https://telegra.ph/Moshennicheskij-broker-Netview-Trading-tradenetviewtradingcom-netviewtradingcom-Otzyvy-i-vozvrat-deneg-05-05-2
  • https://hesselisreal1783.blogspot.com/2021/10/netview-trading.html
  • https://harringtonsolomon1812.blogspot.com/2022/02/turf-capital-private-ltd.html
  • https://franklindrayman72.blogspot.com/2021/12/turf-capital-private-ltd.html
  • https://kuhnabigail184.blogspot.com/2022/01/netview-trading.html
  • https://scartoffdaniel1211.blogspot.com/2021/10/netview-trading.html
  • https://webbalexina831.blogspot.com/2022/02/cresen-ltd-cresenltdcom.html
  • https://blickmarth1195.blogspot.com/2021/11/netview-trading.html
  • https://fishersusan850.blogspot.com/2022/03/netview-trading.html
  • https://harmonbarbara747.blogspot.com/2022/03/cresen-ltd-cresenltdcom.html
  • https://pricedebra405.blogspot.com/2022/01/netview-trading.html
  • https://bernhardkeena541.blogspot.com/2022/02/netview-trading.html
  • https://watsonbruce197.blogspot.com/2022/02/cresen-ltd-cresenltdcom.html
  • https://blogirmamc081.blogspot.com/2021/11/cresenltd-cresenltdcom.html
  • https://pizzichinimorito1033.blogspot.com/2022/03/netview-trading.html
  • https://brownwendy759.blogspot.com/2022/03/cresen-ltd-cresenltdcom.html
  • https://perezsuzanne26.blogspot.com/2021/10/netview-trading.html
  • https://ramirezvictoria1203.blogspot.com/2021/11/netview-trading.html
  • https://parkerharvey1943.blogspot.com/2021/12/cresen-ltd-cresenltdcom.html
  • https://penzu.com/p/d12f6615e16a473c
  • https://ext-6762476.livejournal.com/1591.html
  • https://telegra.ph/Netview-Trading-05-06
  • https://telegra.ph/Netview-Trading-04-11-2
  • https://telegra.ph/Netview-Trading-04-02-5
  • https://www.wikifx.com/ru/dealer/6515188492.html
  • https://x.com/1TellTrue/status/1901994062086869180
  • https://vsyapravda.net/directories/finance/forex/netview-trading
  • https://vc.ru/id4546674/1861797-moshennicheskii-broker-netview-trading-tradenetviewtradingcom-netviewtradingcom-otzyvy-i-vozvrat-deneg

Evidence Box and Screenshots

3 Alerts on Netview Trading

Netview Trading presents itself as a promising gateway to lucrative investments, but beneath its polished facade lies a web of deceit, manipulation, and outright fraud. With an online presence designed to lure unsuspecting investors, the company thrives on misinformation, regulatory evasion, and a relentless effort to suppress the truth. While it claims to offer cutting-edge trading services, a deeper investigation reveals a disturbing pattern of unethical practices, withdrawal restrictions, and an alarming absence of regulatory oversight. If there’s one thing Netview Trading excels at, it’s creating an illusion of legitimacy while operating in the shadows.

A Facade of Legitimacy: The Luxembourg Lie

Netview Trading proudly flaunts a Luxembourg address, suggesting a European stronghold and, by implication, adherence to stringent EU financial regulations. However, this claim crumbles under scrutiny. The purported address is a mere smokescreen, with no tangible ties to any legitimate operations in Luxembourg. This deliberate misrepresentation is not just a minor oversight—it’s a calculated attempt to dupe investors into a false sense of security.

Regulatory Evasion: The Art of Operating in the Shadows

In the financial realm, regulation serves as the bedrock of trust and transparency. Legitimate entities proudly display their regulatory credentials, offering investors a semblance of security. Netview Trading, however, seems to have missed this memo. Their conspicuous absence from any reputable regulatory body’s registry is not just an oversight—it’s a deliberate maneuver. By sidestepping regulation, they operate with impunity, free from the prying eyes of oversight committees. This blatant evasion is a glaring red flag, signaling potential investors to tread cautiously.

The Web of Deception: A Digital Shell Game

A company’s online presence often serves as its digital storefront, offering insights into its operations, values, and legitimacy. Netview Trading’s website, however, is a masterclass in obfuscation. Essential details such as company history, leadership bios, and physical addresses are conspicuously absent. This lack of transparency isn’t just a minor oversight—it’s a strategic ploy to keep inquisitive minds at bay. After all, it’s challenging to hold a phantom accountable.

Client Testimonials: Echoes of Discontent

In the age of digital communication, client testimonials offer invaluable insights into a company’s operations. A cursory glance at online forums and review platforms reveals a chorus of discontented voices lamenting their experiences with Netview Trading. Complaints range from withdrawal issues and unresponsive customer service to allegations of outright fraud. While every company might face occasional criticism, the sheer volume and consistency of grievances against Netview Trading paint a damning picture.

Censorship and Information Suppression: Controlling the Narrative

In an era where information is power, Netview Trading appears to be on a relentless quest to control the narrative. Reports abound of negative reviews mysteriously disappearing from platforms, and whistleblowers facing undue pressure to retract their statements. This aggressive approach to information suppression is not the hallmark of a company with nothing to hide. On the contrary, it’s indicative of an entity desperate to keep its dubious dealings under wraps.

Investor Implications: A Cautionary Tale

For potential investors, Netview Trading serves as a cautionary tale. The allure of high returns and seamless trading experiences is overshadowed by the myriad red flags that permeate its operations. From regulatory evasion and opaque practices to aggressive information suppression, the signs are clear: this is not a vessel one should entrust with their financial aspirations.

Conclusion

In the intricate dance of online trading, due diligence is not just advisable—it’s imperative. Netview Trading’s operations, as illuminated through this investigation, reveal a company more invested in deception than delivering on its promises. Regulatory bodies must take heed, initiating thorough investigations to protect unsuspecting investors. Meanwhile, the trading community must remain vigilant, championing transparency and holding entities like Netview Trading accountable. In the end, the market’s integrity hinges on our collective commitment to exposing and eradicating such malfeasance.

How Was This Done?

The fake DMCA notices we found always use the ? back-dated article? technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a ? true original? article and back-dates it, creating a ? fake original? article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original.

What Happens Next?

The fake DMCA notices we found always use the ? back-dated article? technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a ? true original? article and back-dates it, creating a ? fake original? article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original.

01

Inform Google about the fake DMCA scam

Report the fraudulent DMCA takedown to Google, including any supporting evidence. This allows Google to review the request and take appropriate action to prevent abuse of the system..

02

Share findings with journalists and media

Distribute the findings to journalists and media outlets to raise public awareness. Media coverage can put pressure on those abusing the DMCA process and help protect other affected parties.

03

Inform Lumen Database

Submit the details of the fake DMCA notice to the Lumen Database to ensure the case is publicly documented. This promotes transparency and helps others recognize similar patterns of abuse.

04

File counter notice to reinstate articles

Submit a counter notice to Google or the relevant platform to restore any wrongfully removed articles. Ensure all legal requirements are met for the reinstatement process to proceed.

05

Increase exposure to critical articles

Re-share or promote the affected articles to recover visibility. Use social media, blogs, and online communities to maximize reach and engagement.

06

Expand investigation to identify similar fake DMCAs

Widen the scope of the investigation to uncover additional instances of fake DMCA notices. Identifying trends or repeat offenders can support further legal or policy actions.

learnallrightbg
shield icon

Learn All About Fake Copyright Takedown Scam

Or go directly to the feedback section and share your thoughts

Add Comment Or Feedback

User Reviews

Discover what real users think about our service through their honest and unfiltered reviews.

1.7

Average Ratings

Based on 7 Ratings

★ 1
29%
★ 2
71%
★ 3
0%
★ 4
0%
★ 5
0%

Add Reviews

  • Trust
  • Risk
  • Brand

Lilou Boone

They apply unexplained rules: sudden minimum-trade volumes, exit fees, and endless “verification” loops. When I confronted support, messages were generic and unhelpful, sometimes disappearing entirely. WikiFX and multiple watchdog sites assign the broker a near-zero reliability score. Some call it...

12
12
Orchid Vaughn

Netview Trading's illusion of credibility quickly unraveled. The platform claimed to be regulated in Luxembourg, yet official registries show no valid license. Complaints flood trading forums: users can't withdraw funds, get arbitrarily blocked, or face hidden fees that deplete accounts....

12
12
Ivan Brooks

Seriously, how many complaints do we need before someone actually does something about Netview Trading’s shady practices?

12
12
Hope Vale

I’ve had nothing but trouble with Netview Trading, seems like a scam to me, wouldn’t trust them with a penny.

12
12
Brielle Nash

I got scammed big time. They hide their info, and when I asked about regulations, they couldn’t even answer. Stay away from this one.

12
12
Theo Ellis

Luxembourg address? Lol, more like a bad joke. I looked it up, and there’s no sign of them actually being there. Seems like a scam to me.

12
12
Autumn Meadows

This company seems shady, man. I tried investing, and every time I wanted to withdraw, they gave me some excuse. Not what I expected from a ‘reputable’ company.

12
12
learnallrightbg
shield icon

You are Never Alone in Your Fight

Generate public support against the ones who wronged you!

Our Community
View More Threat Alerts

Website Reviews

Stop fraud before it happens with unbeatable speed, scale, depth, and breadth.

Recent Reviews

Cyber Investigation

Uncover hidden digital threats and secure your assets with our expert cyber investigation services.

Recent Reviews

Threat Alerts

Stay ahead of cyber threats with our daily list of the latest alerts and vulnerabilities.

Recent Reviews

Client Dashboard

Your trusted source for breaking news and insights on cybercrime and digital security trends.

Recent Reviews