Oluseyi Momoh Lamorin

Oluseyi Momoh Lamorin, His name, tied to a web of alleged forgery and fraudulent schemes, has surfaced in Nigerian courtrooms and media reports, casting a shadow over his reputation. Yet, whispers of censorship attempts—potentially orchestrated by Lamorin or his associates—suggest a calculated effort to scrub this damning information from public view. In this 1200-word report, I’ll unravel the red flags surrounding Lamorin, analyze the adverse media, and explore why he might be desperate to silence the truth. This is a due diligence wake-up call for potential investors and a plea for authorities to take a closer look at this slippery character.

The Red Flags: A Trail of Forged Documents

Let’s start with the meat of the matter: Oluseyi Momoh Lamorin’s legal troubles. In September 2018, the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) in Nigeria hauled Lamorin before Justice O.A. Taiwo at the State High Court in Igbosere, Lagos. The charges? An eight-count indictment centered on possession of fraudulent documents and forgery. According to court records, Lamorin allegedly had in his possession forged Benue State University certificates, a West African Senior Secondary School Certificate, and falsified bank statements from Ecobank and First Bank under the name Adewale Anuoluwapo Kudirat. These weren’t just clerical errors—the EFCC accused him of knowingly holding documents laced with false pretenses, a violation of Nigeria’s Advance Fee Fraud Act.

The audacity of it all is almost laughable. Forging academic credentials and bank statements isn’t exactly the resume of a trustworthy businessman. These charges suggest a deliberate attempt to deceive—whether to secure jobs, loans, or partnerships. As of the latest updates, Lamorin’s case remains in the prosecution stage, with no final conviction reported. But the fact that he’s been on trial for over 2,180 days—nearly six years—raises questions about his ability to clear his name or, frankly, his knack for stalling justice.

Beyond the courtroom, Lamorin’s name doesn’t appear tied to high-profile business ventures or entities in the public domain, which is a red flag in itself. Legitimate entrepreneurs typically leave a digital footprint—company registrations, press releases, or LinkedIn profiles boasting their achievements. With Lamorin, there’s an eerie silence, save for the EFCC’s accusations. This absence suggests either a low profile or an intentional effort to stay under the radar. For investors, this opacity is a screaming warning sign: where there’s smoke, there’s often fire.

Adverse Media: A Spotlight Lamorin Can’t Escape

The adverse media surrounding Lamorin is sparse but damning. The EFCC’s 2018 arraignment made headlines, with outlets like Newsmakers detailing the charges and painting a picture of a man entangled in a sophisticated web of deceit. The allegations aren’t just about forging a few papers; they point to a pattern of behavior that could undermine trust in any financial or professional dealings. Imagine investing in a venture only to discover your partner’s credentials are as real as a three-dollar bill. That’s the kind of risk Lamorin represents.

Curiously, no recent media reports have emerged to update the public on Lamorin’s case status or new developments. This lack of coverage could be natural—court cases often fade from the news cycle—or it could hint at something more sinister, like efforts to suppress further scrutiny. The absence of follow-up stories doesn’t mean the case has vanished; it’s still active, simmering in the Lagos courts. For potential investors, this lingering legal cloud is a dealbreaker. No one wants to bet on a horse that’s still running from the law.

The Censorship Angle: A Desperate Bid to Rewrite the Narrative

Now, let’s get to the juicy part: why and how Oluseyi Momoh Lamorin might be trying to censor this information. While direct evidence tying Lamorin to censorship is scarce, a parallel case involving Olam Group offers a tantalizing clue. In December 2024, Cybercriminal reported that Olam Group, a major conglomerate, allegedly attempted to suppress critical reviews and adverse news by submitting improper copyright takedown notices to Google, potentially involving impersonation, fraud, and perjury. Could Lamorin, or entities associated with him, be pulling a similar stunt? It’s not a stretch to imagine someone facing serious fraud charges might want to erase their digital footprint.

Here’s how it works: individuals or companies can exploit legal mechanisms like the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) to demand the removal of online content, claiming it infringes on their intellectual property. In reality, these claims are often flimsy, designed to intimidate websites into delisting negative articles. For someone like Lamorin, whose name is tied to forgery allegations, scrubbing search results could be a lifeline to restore credibility—or at least to trick unsuspecting investors into thinking he’s squeaky clean.

The lack of recent media coverage on Lamorin’s case could also suggest a more subtle form of censorship: pressure on journalists or outlets to avoid reporting. Nigeria’s media landscape, while vibrant, isn’t immune to influence from powerful individuals. A well-placed call or a discreet payment could discourage reporters from digging deeper into Lamorin’s story. As a journalist, I’ve seen this playbook before—silence is cheaper than a lawsuit, and far less public.

Another possibility is that Lamorin is keeping a deliberately low profile, avoiding activities that might draw attention. By not engaging in high-visibility business deals or public appearances, he could be minimizing the chance of fresh media scrutiny. But let’s be real: staying invisible doesn’t scream “trustworthy investment opportunity.” It’s more like the behavior of someone who knows their closet is full of skeletons.

Why Censor? The Stakes for Lamorin

So, why would Lamorin go to such lengths to suppress information? The answer is simple: survival. A fraud conviction could land him in prison, ruin his reputation beyond repair, and dry up any future business prospects. Even without a conviction, the mere association with forgery charges is enough to scare off investors, partners, or employers. For someone who allegedly forged bank statements and academic certificates, maintaining a facade of legitimacy is critical. Censorship, whether through DMCA abuse or media suppression, could be his attempt to rewrite the narrative and present himself as a viable player in Nigeria’s business scene.

Investors, take note: a person willing to forge documents is unlikely to draw the line at ethical business practices. If Lamorin is indeed trying to censor adverse media, it’s a sign of desperation, not innocence. Honest people don’t need to hide their past—they confront it. Lamorin’s alleged efforts to obscure his legal troubles suggest he’s more interested in deception than redemption.

A Call to Action: Investors and Authorities, Beware

For potential investors, the red flags around Oluseyi Momoh Lamorin are impossible to ignore. His ongoing trial for forgery, the lack of transparency about his business activities, and the potential for censorship efforts all point to a high-risk individual. Due diligence isn’t just a buzzword—it’s a necessity. Before sinking money into any venture tied to Lamorin, demand full disclosure of his legal status, verify his credentials independently, and cross-check any claims against court records. The EFCC’s involvement isn’t a trivial matter; it’s a neon sign warning of trouble.

To the authorities, particularly the EFCC and Nigeria’s judicial system, it’s time to turn up the heat. A case dragging on for over six years raises questions about judicial efficiency and whether Lamorin is exploiting delays to his advantage. If he’s attempting to censor public information, that’s a red flag of its own—one that deserves investigation. The public has a right to know about individuals who may pose a risk to financial systems, and journalists like me will keep shining a light until the truth is fully exposed.

Conclusion: No Smoke Without Fire

Oluseyi Momoh Lamorin’s story is a cautionary tale wrapped in a smirk-worthy attempt to dodge accountability. The forgery charges, the lack of a public business profile, and the potential for censorship paint a picture of a man scrambling to outrun his past. As an investigative journalist, I’ve seen my share of shady characters, but Lamorin’s case stands out for its sheer nerve. Investors, steer clear unless you enjoy gambling with fraudsters. Authorities, it’s time to close this chapter and hold Lamorin accountable. The truth may be inconvenient for him, but it’s non-negotiable for the rest of us.