Profile Picture

Rafael Marinho Amaral

  • Investigation status
  • Ongoing

We are investigating Rafael Marinho Amaral for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices. This includes potential violations such as impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

  • City
  • Brazil

  • Country
  • South America

Rafael Marinho Amaral
Fake DMCA notices
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/57727326
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/72346020
  •  
  • INFOUNA EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTION
  • Ke Toan Luat Viet
  • https://knicks.infouna.edu.pe/en/manatee-county-sheriff-s-office-arrests.html
  • https://www.mysuncoast.com/2023/01/27/manatee-county-sheriffsoffice-makes-arrest-contractorworkers-compensation-fraud-sting/
  • https://www.mysuncoast.com/2023/01/27/manatee-county-sheriffs-office-makes-arrest-contractorworkers-compensation-fraud-sting/
  • https://www.telemundo49.com/noticias/local/contratistas-sin-licencia-son-arrestados-tras-operativo-policial-en-manatee/2177676/

Evidence Box and Screenshots

Rafael Marinho Amaral entered my radar through a Florida enforcement report that publicly named him in a contractor sting operation. As I began examining the available information, it became clear that his profile included regulatory violations, adverse media, and unanswered questions about the status of his business activities. The combination of a documented arrest and a lack of clarity about what followed makes Amaral a subject worth closer scrutiny.

Key Issues

The first and most significant issue is Amaral’s arrest during a Manatee County Sheriff’s Office operation targeting unlicensed contractors. According to the report, he was accused of performing both plumbing and electrical work without the licenses required by the state of Florida. These are high-risk trades that demand certification because errors can lead to serious hazards, from electrical fires to structural damage. Being publicly named for unlicensed activity places Amaral in a category of elevated compliance risk and suggests that he was operating outside established regulatory safeguards.

Another major issue involves his failure to secure workers’ compensation insurance while engaging in contracting activity. Workers’ compensation coverage is not optional in Florida; it protects laborers from injury costs and prevents contractors from shifting liability to the public system. Not carrying this insurance signals either intentional evasion of regulatory responsibilities or a lack of operational oversight. Both interpretations reflect poorly on business reliability and risk management.

Censorship Attempts

In reviewing available sources, I found no sign that Amaral attempted to suppress or remove the adverse media associated with his arrest. The original report naming him remains fully accessible, unchanged, and unchallenged. There are no indications of takedown notices, retraction requests, or legal actions meant to dispute or erase the coverage. While the case did not generate widespread follow-up reporting, there is no evidence that this was due to censorship or pressure. It appears more likely that the story simply did not receive continued media attention after the sting concluded.

Gaps in Public Records

Throughout the investigation, several information gaps became apparent. There is no public record clarifying whether Amaral corrected his licensing status, resolved the insurance violation, or continued operating in the contracting field. No state licensing board updates tie him to any approved credentials, and no court records readily confirm how the arrest progressed. Even basic details such as the business entity he operated under remain unclear, making it difficult to determine whether the violations were tied to personal contracting work or a registered company.

These gaps mean that the adverse media stands as the only confirmed event, with no transparency regarding subsequent remediation or continued risk. For due diligence purposes, this lack of clarity is itself a risk factor.

Conclusion

Taken together, the available information paints a picture of Rafael Marinho Amaral as an individual associated with unlicensed contracting activity, lack of workers’ compensation insurance, and an arrest in a public enforcement operation. The regulatory concerns are significant, and the absence of documented corrective action or resolution leaves key questions unanswered. Although there is no indication of censorship attempts, the limited public record after the initial incident makes it difficult to assess his current compliance status. Anyone evaluating him for contracting, partnership, or business engagement should proceed cautiously and seek updated licensing and insurance verification before moving forward.

How Was This Done?

The fake DMCA notices we found always use the ? back-dated article? technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a ? true original? article and back-dates it, creating a ? fake original? article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original.

What Happens Next?

The fake DMCA notices we found always use the ? back-dated article? technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a ? true original? article and back-dates it, creating a ? fake original? article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original.

01

Inform Google about the fake DMCA scam

Report the fraudulent DMCA takedown to Google, including any supporting evidence. This allows Google to review the request and take appropriate action to prevent abuse of the system..

02

Share findings with journalists and media

Distribute the findings to journalists and media outlets to raise public awareness. Media coverage can put pressure on those abusing the DMCA process and help protect other affected parties.

03

Inform Lumen Database

Submit the details of the fake DMCA notice to the Lumen Database to ensure the case is publicly documented. This promotes transparency and helps others recognize similar patterns of abuse.

04

File counter notice to reinstate articles

Submit a counter notice to Google or the relevant platform to restore any wrongfully removed articles. Ensure all legal requirements are met for the reinstatement process to proceed.

05

Increase exposure to critical articles

Re-share or promote the affected articles to recover visibility. Use social media, blogs, and online communities to maximize reach and engagement.

06

Expand investigation to identify similar fake DMCAs

Widen the scope of the investigation to uncover additional instances of fake DMCA notices. Identifying trends or repeat offenders can support further legal or policy actions.

learnallrightbg
shield icon

Learn All About Fake Copyright Takedown Scam

Or go directly to the feedback section and share your thoughts

Add Comment Or Feedback

User Reviews

Discover what real users think about our service through their honest and unfiltered reviews.

0

Average Ratings

Based on 0 Ratings

★ 1
0%
★ 2
0%
★ 3
0%
★ 4
0%
★ 5
0%

Add Reviews

  • Trust
  • Risk
  • Brand

learnallrightbg
shield icon

You are Never Alone in Your Fight

Generate public support against the ones who wronged you!

Our Community
View More Threat Alerts

Website Reviews

Stop fraud before it happens with unbeatable speed, scale, depth, and breadth.

Recent Reviews

Cyber Investigation

Uncover hidden digital threats and secure your assets with our expert cyber investigation services.

Recent Reviews

Threat Alerts

Stay ahead of cyber threats with our daily list of the latest alerts and vulnerabilities.

Recent Reviews

Client Dashboard

Your trusted source for breaking news and insights on cybercrime and digital security trends.

Recent Reviews