CyberCriminal.com

XM Group

We are investigating XM Group for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices. This includes potential violations such as impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

PARTIES INVOLVED : XM Group

ALLEGATIONS : Perjury, Fraud, Impersonation

INCIDENT DATE : 20 Aug 2024

INVESTIGATED BY : Ethan Katz

TOOLS USED : Lumen, FakeDMCA, SecurityTrails

CASE NO : 0620/A/2024

CRIME TYPE : Intellectual Property Scam

PUBLISHED ON : 22 Nov 2024

XM Group
Due Diligence
Get everything we know about XM Group in one downloadable PDF document
Is This About You?
We encourage you to share details of the actual perpetrators and get your story straight.

What We Are Investigating?

Our firm is launching a comprehensive investigation into XM Group over allegations that it has been suppressing critical reviews and unfavorable Google search results by fraudulently misusing DMCA takedown notices. These actions, if proven, could constitute serious legal violations—including impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

We conducted comprehensive analyses of fraudulent copyright takedown requests, meritless legal complaints, and other unlawful efforts to suppress public access to critical information. Our reporting sheds light on the prevalence and modus operandi of a structured censorship network, often funded and used by criminal enterprises, oligarchs and criminal entities seeking to manipulate public perception and bypass AML checks conducted by financial organisations.

The fake DMCA notices in this investigation appears to have been strategically deployed to remove negative content from Google search results illegally. Based on this pattern, we have reasonable grounds to infer that XM Group - or an entity acting at its behest - is directly or indirectly complicit in this cyber crime.

In most such cases, such ops are executed by rogue, fly-by-night 'Online Reputation Management' agencies acting on behalf of their clients. If evidence establishes that the subject knowingly benefited from or facilitated this scam, it may be deemed an 'accomplice' or an 'accessory' to the crime.

What are they trying to censor

XM Group, a prominent player in the online trading and forex industry, has garnered both positive attention and considerable controversy over the years. While the company has built a strong client base and established itself as a recognizable brand in the financial services sector, several allegations, red flags, and adverse news stories have raised concerns about its business practices and reputation. These issues have led to questions regarding XM Group’s ethical standing and its commitment to transparency and client protection.

Allegations and Red Flags
Regulatory Concerns and Licensing Issues: XM Group has faced scrutiny over its regulatory standing in various jurisdictions. While the company claims to operate under multiple financial authorities, there have been concerns about its registration with regulatory bodies in certain regions. In particular, some critics point to inconsistencies between the licenses XM Group holds and its operations in specific markets, raising questions about its compliance with industry standards.

Suspicious Spreads and Slippage: Traders have reported issues with XM Group’s spreads and slippage, particularly during volatile market conditions. Complaints often highlight instances where spreads widen unexpectedly, leading to higher-than-advertised costs for traders. In some cases, clients have claimed that orders were executed at unfavorable prices or delayed during times of high market volatility, resulting in unexpected losses.

Withdrawal Issues and Delays: One of the most damaging red flags for XM Group has been the reports of difficulties with withdrawals. Multiple traders have complained that they faced long delays in receiving funds from their accounts or were asked for excessive documentation that seemed unnecessary. Some users claim that these delays were a tactic to discourage or prevent them from withdrawing their money, sparking concerns about the company’s financial practices and trustworthiness.

Misleading Promotions and Bonuses: XM Group has been accused of using misleading marketing tactics, especially concerning bonuses and promotional offers. Traders have reported that bonuses offered by the company were often tied to unrealistic trading requirements, making it nearly impossible for clients to withdraw the funds once the terms were met. These promotions, marketed as a way to enhance traders’ profits, have been criticized as deceptive and potentially harmful to both inexperienced and seasoned traders.

Customer Service Complaints: Another recurring issue for XM Group is the quality of its customer support. Numerous clients have complained about unresponsive or unhelpful customer service, particularly when dealing with issues related to withdrawals or technical problems. Long wait times, inadequate responses, and lack of resolution to critical issues have contributed to dissatisfaction and a negative reputation online.

Potential Harm to Reputation
These allegations collectively harm XM Group’s reputation, especially in the highly competitive and scrutinized online trading sector. Issues with withdrawals, misleading promotions, and subpar customer service can drive potential clients away, as trust is essential in financial services. Traders who encounter problems with slippage, spreads, or delayed withdrawals may be less inclined to continue using XM Group’s platform, further tarnishing the company’s image.

The regulatory concerns also pose a significant risk, as potential traders may be hesitant to engage with a broker that has questionable licensing. In the financial services industry, credibility with regulators is crucial to attracting and retaining clients, and any doubts about compliance can result in a loss of trust.

Why XM Group Might Want These Stories Removed
Given the significant damage these issues could cause to XM Group’s brand and bottom line, the company might feel compelled to take extreme actions to remove or suppress negative content. If these stories gain traction online, they could lead to a decline in clients, a loss of revenue, and increased scrutiny from financial regulators.

To protect its reputation and maintain its position in the marketplace, XM Group might consider unethical measures, including committing cyber crimes, to remove or manipulate negative reviews and news stories. This could involve hacking or deploying tactics to suppress complaints or manipulate online feedback. While these actions would only further damage its standing if discovered, the pressure to protect its brand in a highly competitive industry could push the company toward such measures.

Conclusion
The combination of regulatory concerns, negative trader feedback, and customer service complaints creates a serious threat to XM Group’s reputation. As the online trading world becomes more competitive and reliant on customer trust, the company’s efforts to eliminate these adverse stories could have significant long-term consequences, particularly if they involve illegal or unethical actions.

  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/43947147
  • Aug 20, 2024
  • SynergyNet Technologies LLC
  • https://www.investing.com/brokers/reviews/xm-group/
  • https://www.forexbrokers.com/reviews/xm

Evidence Box

Evidence and relevant screenshots related to our investigation

Targeted Content and Red Flags

trustpilot.com

XM isn't a trusted broker

  • Red Flag
Visit Link

forexpeacearmy.com

XM GLOBAL LTD SCAM

  • Red Flag
Visit Link

forexpeacearmy.com

XM Global closed my accounts says I’m doing fraudulent stuff

  • Red Flag
Visit Link

About the Author

The author is affiliated with TU Dresden and analyzes public databases such as Lumen Database and FakeDMCA.com to identify and expose online censorship. In his personal capacity, he and his team have been actively investigating and reporting on organized crime related to fraudulent copyright takedown schemes.

Additionally, his team provides advisory services to major law firms and is frequently consulted on matters pertaining to intellectual property law.

He can be reached at [email protected] directly.

Escalate This Case
Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.
Checkboxes

Learn All About Fake Copyright Takedown Scam

Or go directly to the feedback section and share your thoughts

How This Was Done

The fake DMCA notices we found always use the 'back-dated article' technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a 'true original' article and back-dates it, creating a 'fake original' article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original

What Happens Next?

Based on the feedback, information, and requests received from all relevant parties, our team will formally notify the affected party of the alleged infringement. Following a thorough review, we will submit a counter-notice to reinstate any link that has been removed by Google, in accordance with applicable legal provisions. Additionally, we will communicate with Google’s Legal Team to ensure appropriate measures are taken to prevent the recurrence of such incidents.

You are Never Alone in Your Fight.

Generate public support against the ones who wronged you!

Domain Check

Stop fraud before it happens with unbeatable speed, scale, depth, and breadth.

Recent Checks

Cyber Investigation

Uncover hidden digital threats and secure your assets with our expert cyber investigation services.

Recent Investigation

Our Community

Your trusted source for breaking news and insights on cybercrime and digital security trends.

Visit Forum

Threads Alert

Stay ahead of cyber threats with our daily list of the latest alerts and vulnerabilities.

Threads Alert