Stake

Stake

  • United States flag United States
  • 8 Years

0/5

Based On 0 Review

  • Not Recommended
  • Scammer
  • Fraudster
  • High Risk
  • Shady
  • Accused
  • Not Recommended
  • Scammer
  • Fraudster
  • High Risk
Regulation 5.5
3.42
License
6
Business
7
Software
7.5
Risk Control
6.5
havebeenscam

Have you been scammed by Stake? Do you seek help in reporting a cyber crime?

Report File a Complaint

1 Complaint filed since 2025-04-18

Since 2025-04-18

  • Alias
  • Company
  • Stake

  • Phone
  • City
  • Curacao

  • Email
  • Country
  • Curacao

  • Allegations
  • Financial Fraud

Management and Accountability

ceoimgone
Ed Craven

Co Founder

ceoimgone
Bijan Tehrani

Co Founder

Scam Allegations

Stake is accused of rigging crypto betting odds , delaying withdrawals.

Adverse Media

Criticized for targeting minors via influencer campaigns and weak age verificat...

Regulatory Concerns

Curacao-licensed Stake evades AML compliance, enabling unregulated crypto bets.

Hidden Ownership

Medium Rare N.V. obscures true owners, fueling evasion risks in crypto gambling.

Associated Domains

Stake.com and stake.us are linked to scam complaints in Medium Rare’s betting ne...

Fraud Network Ties

Connected to Curacao-based crypto casinos with rigged games and payout delays.

Money Laundering Exposure

Stake’s crypto transactions risk illicit flows, flagged by FATF for Curacao’s la...

Data Privacy Violations

Reports highlight Stake’s failure to secure user data.

Unethical Marketing

Stake uses aggressive influencer partnerships with figures like Drake to lure vu...

OSINT Data

Online source intel on Stake, covering censored info, compliance risk analysis, and licensing details.

5

Hackers stole approximately $41 million from Stake’s Ethereum, BSC, and Polygon hot wallets in September 2023.

Stake was forced to shut down its UK operations after its white‑label partner TGP Europe surrendered its UK license under Gambling Commission scrutiny

Multiple complaints describe funds “pending” for days, verification dragging on indefinitely, or funds being withheld altogether.

Some users assert that their accounts were banned or frozen after large wins, with little rationale or recourse offered.

A class‑action lawsuit in Illinois accuses Stake.us of operating an unlicensed online casino and misleading consumers via its social casino model.

Stake.com, established in 2017, has rapidly become a prominent player in the cryptocurrency casino sector. While it markets itself as a fair and transparent platform, multiple controversies, red flags, and censorship allegations cast serious doubt on its legitimacy. As of October 7, 2025, these concerns continue to challenge trust in the platform among users and regulators alike.

Major Allegations and Red Flags

User Complaints and Allegations of Unfair Practices
Stake.com has faced numerous reports of abrupt account suspensions, particularly targeting users in regions where online gambling is restricted. Users have reported being placed in “Withdrawal Mode,” which blocks further play while ostensibly allowing fund withdrawals. One notable case involved a user claiming the platform confiscated $100,000 and then ceased all communication, highlighting opaque handling of significant funds.

Censorship and Narrative Control
Stake.com appears to actively suppress negative feedback and criticism. Allegations include censoring user posts, blocking withdrawals, and manipulating VIP bonuses. Its Terms of Service grant broad discretion to suspend or terminate accounts without detailed explanations, fostering distrust and limiting transparency.

Regulatory Evasion and Legal Controversies
The company has been accused of exploiting legal loopholes to provide cryptocurrency gambling services to customers in jurisdictions where such activities are restricted, including the UK. Stake.com is also engaged in a legal dispute with an Australian digital investment platform over consumer protection and copyright infringement, indicating a willingness to use aggressive legal strategies.

Marketing and Ethical Concerns
Stake.com’s social media campaigns have drawn scrutiny from the Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) for the use of viral content, including the company’s logo superimposed on disturbing imagery. Such marketing tactics raise ethical questions and suggest attempts to manipulate public perception.

Opaque Terms and Conditions
The platform’s Terms of Service are vague and grant extensive powers to suspend or terminate accounts without clear justification. This opacity creates potential for exploitation against users and undermines transparency in operations.

Negative User Feedback
Consistent complaints across forums and review platforms highlight systemic issues such as account suspensions, withheld funds, and unresponsive customer support. The prevalence of these grievances underscores recurring operational deficiencies.

Aggressive Censorship
Reports of Stake.com actively censoring user feedback and blocking withdrawals indicate a deliberate strategy to suppress negative information, preventing potential users from making fully informed decisions.

Regulatory Avoidance
Stake.com’s exploitation of legal loopholes and engagement in contentious legal battles reflects an unwillingness to fully comply with regulatory standards, raising concerns about the legality and ethics of its operations across jurisdictions.

Reputational Damage and Risk of Suppression
The combination of user complaints, censorship, regulatory evasions, and questionable marketing has significantly harmed Stake.com’s credibility. To protect its brand and maintain investor confidence, the platform may be incentivized to suppress damaging narratives through measures such as disinformation campaigns or digital manipulation, which could exacerbate legal and ethical exposure.

Conclusion
Stake.com’s operations reveal a striking contrast between its marketed image and actual practices. User complaints, censorship efforts, regulatory evasion, and ethically dubious marketing raise serious concerns about its legitimacy and fairness. Potential investors and users should exercise extreme caution, conducting thorough due diligence before engagement. Regulatory authorities are urged to investigate the platform’s operations to ensure compliance and protect the integrity of the online cryptocurrency gambling ecosystem.

Related Reports and Intel on Stake

learnallrightbg
shield icon

Learn All About Fake Copyright Takedown Scam

Or go directly to the feedback section and share your thoughts

Add Comment Or Feedback
SurgeTrader

SurgeTrader

Review

  • Trust Score

Moon Group

Review

  • 1.9
  • Trust Score

User Reviews

Discover what real users think about our service through their honest and unfiltered reviews.

0

Average Ratings

Based on 0 Ratings

★ 1
0%
★ 2
0%
★ 3
0%
★ 4
0%
★ 5
0%

Add Reviews

  • Trust
  • Risk
  • Brand
Choose Image
Choose Video

learnallrightbg
shield icon

You are Never Alone in Your Fight

Generate public support against the ones who wronged you!

Our Community

Website Reviews

Stop fraud before it happens with unbeatable speed, scale, depth, and breadth.

Recent Reviews

Cyber Investigation

Uncover hidden digital threats and secure your assets with our expert cyber investigation services.

Recent Reviews

Threat Alerts

Stay ahead of cyber threats with our daily list of the latest alerts and vulnerabilities.

Recent Reviews

Client Dashboard

Your trusted source for breaking news and insights on cybercrime and digital security trends.

Recent Reviews