Justin Godur

Full Report

Key Points

• Multiple federal and state civil lawsuits filed in Florida allege coordinated fraud, advance-fee schemes, and investor deception by Justin Godur and associated parties.

• Defendants include Justin Godur, Morris Jaime Godur (father), real estate professional AnnaMarie DeFrank, and business entities such as Capital Max Group LLC (formerly Q7Capital/Godur-controlled companies).

• Complaints claim investors were induced to pay upfront fees for purported large credit lines and finance facilities that never materialized.

• Separate lawsuits allege misappropriation of multimillion-dollar investor funds, forgery, fraudulent documents, and breaches of contract.

• Several attorneys have reportedly withdrawn from representing Godur’s businesses in these matters, often citing ethical concerns or non-payment issues.

Overview

Justin Godur is publicly described as a Florida-based business executive associated with finance, private lending, and real-estate-related services. He has been connected to entities such as Capital Max Group LLC and previously to businesses operating under names such as Q7 Capital. Public profiles and marketing materials portray him as a president or senior executive offering access to large credit lines, funding solutions, and investment opportunities, often framed as family-office-style services. Court filings and media reports, however, depict a significantly different picture, centered on disputes with investors and counterparties who claim promised financing never materialized.

Allegations and Concerns

Several civil complaints filed in federal and state courts allege that Justin Godur, together with family members and business associates, orchestrated an advance-fee scheme in which clients were required to pay substantial upfront amounts in exchange for promised high-value credit lines. According to these filings, the credit facilities were either fictitious or never properly submitted to legitimate lenders. Plaintiffs allege that after fees were paid, communications stalled, documentation was inconsistent or misleading, and no funding was delivered. A federal RICO lawsuit filed in the Southern District of Florida characterizes the conduct as a coordinated, multi-year scheme involving wire fraud, civil theft, and conspiracy.

Additional allegations appearing in civil complaints include the use of forged or misleading term sheets, fabricated invoices, and misrepresentation of licensing, insurance, or lender relationships. Some plaintiffs further allege exploitation of elderly investors and diversion of investor funds for personal or unrelated expenditures. These claims are contested and remain subject to judicial determination, but they recur across multiple cases and jurisdictions.

Customer Feedback

There is no evidence of established, independent consumer-review platforms such as the Better Business Bureau or Trustpilot containing verified positive feedback related to Justin Godur or the primary entities named in litigation. Instead, public narratives largely consist of sworn statements and affidavits filed by plaintiffs. These accounts commonly describe repeated reassurances that funding was imminent, ongoing requests for additional fees, and a lack of verifiable lender confirmations. No consistent, third-party positive testimonials were identified in the available public sources.

Risk Considerations

From a financial perspective, the ongoing lawsuits involve claims totaling several million dollars, exposing any associated businesses to potential judgments, damages, and enforcement actions. Reputationally, the existence of a federal RICO action and numerous fraud-related civil suits presents a high level of public and counterpart concern, particularly in financial and investment contexts where trust is critical. Legally, unresolved litigation across federal and state courts introduces uncertainty and the possibility of injunctive relief, damages, or regulatory scrutiny if allegations are substantiated.

Business Relations and Associations

Court filings and investigative articles frequently reference close associations between Justin Godur and his father, Morris Jaime Godur, who is named as a co-defendant in several actions. Real estate professional AnnaMarie DeFrank is also referenced in litigation and related reporting as an associated party. The principal business entities connected to the allegations include Capital Max Group LLC, Defgod LLC, and historically Q7-branded companies, which plaintiffs allege were used to solicit funds and convey legitimacy to potential investors.

Legal and Financial Concerns

The legal record reflects an active federal civil RICO case alongside multiple Florida state court actions alleging fraud, theft, breach of contract, and misrepresentation. Some filings also reference eviction proceedings and employment-related disputes involving associated companies, suggesting potential operational and cash-flow stress. No confirmed criminal convictions or bankruptcy filings appear in the sources reviewed, but the civil exposure alone represents substantial legal and financial risk.

Risk Assessment Table

From a risk-analysis standpoint, the concentration of similar allegations across multiple plaintiffs and courts is a significant warning indicator. Advance-fee requirements for large credit facilities, particularly when accompanied by limited transparency and unverifiable lender relationships, are widely recognized as high-risk characteristics in financial services. While allegations alone do not establish liability, the breadth of disputes materially elevates counterparty risk.

Any potential investor, lender, or business partner should approach involvement with extreme caution, conduct independent verification of licenses and regulatory standing, and seek qualified legal advice before transferring funds or entering contractual relationships. Until the pending matters are resolved, exposure to Justin Godur or closely associated entities should be considered high risk.