Revolut.com Unapproved

Visit Website Call Phone

19

Connections data
47

Tech data
7

OSINT data
1

Red Flag
5

Photo

2.4

Trust Score

low

Trust Index

Updated (2025-10-04)

19

Connections data
47

Tech data
7

OSINT data
1

Red Flag
5

Photo

Have you been scammed by Revolut.com? Do you seek help in reporting a cyber crime?

Report File a Complaint

1 Complaint filed since 2025-04-18

Since 2025-04-18

Connections

Explore all connections and hidden relationships between Revolut.com and other domains and websites, uncovering the common link that ties these web properties together.

19

Domain Name	Connection	Data Point	Detected
rev.money	Google Analytics Tagv	UA-55115921	February-17
fift.jp	Bizo Tag	BZ-319218	August-24
bollard.jp	Bizo Tag	BZ-319218	August-24
kajana.jp	Bizo Tag	BZ-319218	October-13
anyany.jp	Bizo Tag	BZ-319218	September-17
ennova.jp	Bizo Tag	BZ-319218	August-24
toobi.co.jp	Bizo Tag	BZ-319218	October-23
sumireya.co.jp	Bizo Tag	BZ-319218	June-24
windam.co.jp	Bizo Tag	BZ-319218	September-17
gekijuku.com	Bizo Tag	BZ-319218	February-12
starlinepromos.com	Bizo Tag	BZ-319218	December-17
saemuimaur.com	Bizo Tag	BZ-319218	April-20
zksp.jp	Bizo Tag	BZ-319218	June-24
wipe-t.fift.jp	Bizo Tag	BZ-319218	August-24
ilab.fift.jp	Bizo Tag	BZ-319218	August-24
stripes.fift.jp	Bizo Tag	BZ-319218	August-24
jewel.fift.jp	Bizo Tag	BZ-319218	August-24
blog.revolut.com	Google Tag Manager	GTM-MB5SHRL	Jul 2023
therevolut.com	Google Tag Manager	GTM-MB5SHRL	Jun 2018

Data Points

Key data points, technology stack, infrastructure details, contact information, and identities revealed

47

Created on
2006-05-04

Updated on
2024-06-18

Expires on
2031-05-04

DNS
Cloudflare

Registrar
Squarespace Domains II LLC

Address
7 Westferry Circus, Canary Wharf, London, England, E14 4HD

Ip add
104.18.38.135

Name Server
ns-cloud-d1.googledomains.com

Name Server
ns-cloud-d2.googledomains.com

Name Server
ns-cloud-d3.googledomains.com

Name Server
ns-cloud-d4.googledomains.com

Google Tag Managar
GTM-G-NC0XSL7JGN

Google Tag Managar
GTM-UA-55115921-1

Google Tag Managar
GTM-MB5SHRL

Bizo Tag
BZ-319218

Google+ Tag
GP-101110798397657121777

Same Owner
revolut.it

Same Owner
revolut.com.pl

Same Owner
revolut.download

Same Owner
revolud.pl

Same Owner
kurs-funta.pl

Founder And CEO
Nik Storonsk

CEO, US
Siddhartha Jajodia

Co-founder &
Vladyslav Y.

Contact (United States - Connecticut)
+1-203-725-7583

Contact
+442033228352

Facebook
@Revolut

Instagram
@revolutapp

Twitter
@revolutapp

LinkedIn
@Revolut

Tiktok
@revolutapp

Email
[email protected]

Email
[email protected]

Email
[email protected]

Email
[email protected]

Email
[email protected]

Email
[email protected]

Email
[email protected]

Email
[email protected]

Email
[email protected]

Email
[email protected]

Email
[email protected]

Email
[email protected]

Email
[email protected]

Email
[email protected]

Email
[email protected]

Email
[email protected]

OSINT Data

Online source intel on Revolut.com, covering censored info, compliance risk analysis, and licensing details.

7

Revolut is not protected by the FSCS, meaning that if the company were to go bankrupt, customers might not have their funds safeguarded.

Yes, in 2022, Revolut suffered a cyberattack that exposed the personal data of tens of thousands of customers, raising concerns about its data protection measures.

Yes, there have been instances where customers experienced unauthorized transactions. For example, George Williams reported a £21,500 fraudulent spending spree after his phone and wallet were stolen, and it took 18 months for Revolut to refund him.

Users have criticized Revolut's customer service for being unresponsive and inadequate, especially during emergencies involving fraud or unauthorized transactions. In one case, a customer lost €197,000 in an hour and found Revolut's support insufficient in addressing the issue promptly.

Yes, concerns have been raised about Revolut's security protocols. In some reported cases, fraudsters were able to bypass identity verification processes, leading to significant unauthorized withdrawals from customer accounts.

Yes, in late 2020, Revolut Payments UAB, a European subsidiary of Revolut, was fined €70,000 by the Bank of Lithuania for failing to submit audited annual financial statements within the required timeframe, violating Lithuanian financial laws.

Summary Report On Revolut.com

Revolut.com, founded in 2015 and headquartered in London with a Lithuanian banking license, serves over 60 million users globally as a digital banking app. It offers multi-currency accounts, instant transfers, crypto trading, stock investments, and budgeting tools, with no monthly fees on its basic plan and up to 4.5% interest on savings. Regulated by the FCA in the UK and under EU rules, it claims advanced fraud detection and 24/7 support. However, red flags include the highest number of fraud complaints among UK banks, with 3,242 authorized push payment (APP) cases referred to the Financial Ombudsman Service (FOS) in 2024 and 1,875 in 2025 to date, per Which? data from October 2025. This outpaces Monzo (2,344 in 2024) and Barclays (1,704), despite Revolut’s smaller UK customer base. A €3.5 million fine from Lithuania’s central bank in April 2025 for AML control failures marked its largest penalty, following a €70,000 fine in 2022 for late financial statements. An Australian AML reporting fine of A$187,000 in September 2025 added to the tally. Adverse media underscores user harms. A Guardian article from April 2025 details a £40,000 scam where Revolut refused a refund, citing user negligence despite no dedicated helpline. The Times reported a £21,000 shopping spree by thieves using a customer’s Revolut cash in October 2025. Huffington Post covered a BBC investigation on a digital banking scam losing €197,000 per hour, implicating Revolut’s vulnerabilities. MoneySavingExpert forums from 2025 echo safety doubts, with users reporting frozen accounts and poor scam reimbursements. Trustpilot’s 4.5/5 from 278,000 reviews hides 1-star complaints of unresponsive support and denied refunds, while Reddit’s r/Revolut threads from 2025 discuss attrition bias in negative posts. No major US fines in 2025, but patterns suggest inadequate fraud prevention for its scale.

The Censorship Approach: Selective Responses and Low Visibility

Revolut.com manages criticism by channeling it privately. Its app and site lack public forums, directing issues to in-app chat yielding generic “reach out via secure message” replies, as in Trustpilot cases with no public resolutions. It responds to 70% of negatives within days but urges email escalations, avoiding details—e.g., a 2025 scam claim got a vague “data-driven review” note. No Reviews.io profile lets complaints accumulate with spam, unanswered. Social media (X) focuses on promos, ignoring #RevolutScam tags, and SEO prioritizes awards over alerts. This fragments feedback, making systemic issues hard to track.

Why They Hide It: To Protect Growth Amid Complaints

Revolut.com relies on rapid user acquisition for its 60 million base and $45 billion valuation. Public exposure of fraud volumes or fines could slow sign-ups in 2025’s cautious market. With EU/UK oversight demanding reimbursements, vague “negligence” claims dodge payouts, prioritizing scale over fixes. By private deflections, it maintains a 4.5-star facade for investors, betting opacity sustains momentum.

Conclusion: Approach Revolut.com with Caution

Revolut.com innovates banking but leads in fraud complaints and faces fines, risking your funds on unproven safeguards. Users, enable all security and test refunds—consider traditional banks for main accounts. Regulators like FCA and FOS should enforce faster reimbursements and transparency. Digital finance needs accountability, not excuses; time for reform.