Profile Picture

Abbas Reza Iravani

Threat Alert
  • Investigation status
  • Ongoing

We are investigating Abbas Reza Iravani for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices. This includes potential violations such as impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

  • Alias
  • Abbas Iravani

  • Company
  • Ezam Automotive Parts Group

  • Phone
  • 1477

  • City
  • Tehran

  • Country
  • Iran

  • Allegations
  • Corruption

Abbas Reza Iravani
Fake DMCA notices
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/51528154
  • uj22.com
  • https://uj22.com/947-2/
  • https://cdn.occrp.org/projects/dubai-unlocked/en/

Evidence Box and Screenshots

3 Alerts on Abbas Reza Iravani

Abbas Reza Iravani, once a towering figure in Iran’s automotive industry, has become emblematic of the nation’s ongoing struggle with corruption and economic malpractice. As the founder and main shareholder of Ezam Automotive Parts Group, Iravani’s influence extended beyond manufacturing, touching the realms of politics, religion, and international finance. However, a series of investigations and court proceedings have unveiled a complex web of illicit activities, casting a long shadow over his legacy.

A Titan in the Automotive Sector

Established in 1993, Ezam Automotive Parts Group rapidly ascended to prominence, comprising twelve manufacturing companies that supplied essential components to Iran’s leading car manufacturers, including Iran Khodro and SAIPA. Under Iravani’s leadership, the conglomerate not only bolstered Iran’s automotive capabilities but also positioned itself as a critical player in the nation’s industrial landscape. Beyond business, Iravani was recognized for his philanthropic endeavors, notably his contributions to Shi’ite religious causes and the restoration of holy sites in Iraq.

Unveiling the Allegations

In October 2019, Iranian authorities charged Iravani with “corruption on Earth,” a severe accusation under Islamic law that can carry the death penalty. The charges encompassed a range of offenses, including the systematic smuggling of auto parts valued at approximately $764 million, accruing over 30 trillion rials (around $714 million) in unpaid bank debts, and misappropriating 40 trillion rials (approximately $950 million) from the national treasury. Furthermore, Iravani was accused of paying substantial bribes to customs officials and other authorities to facilitate these operations .

Defense and Denials

During court proceedings, Iravani refuted the charges, asserting that his actions were aimed at circumventing international sanctions imposed on Iran between 2011 and 2015. He claimed that his efforts were acts of economic bravery rather than criminal endeavors. Additionally, Iravani alleged that the Intelligence Organization of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) accused him of installing surveillance devices in vehicles used by government officials—a claim he vehemently denied, questioning the plausibility of such targeted installations .

Political Entanglements and Influence

Iravani’s close associations with influential political figures, including the late President Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani, have raised concerns about potential conflicts of interest and undue influence. His philanthropic activities, particularly those aligned with state-sponsored religious initiatives, further entrenched his position within the political and religious elite. These connections have led to speculations about the extent to which his political ties may have shielded him from scrutiny or facilitated his alleged misconduct .

Judicial Proceedings and Sentencing

Initially facing the severe charge of “corruption on Earth,” Iravani’s case took a turn when Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei intervened in similar corruption cases, advocating for leniency. Subsequently, the charges against Iravani were downgraded to “disrupting the country’s economic system,” a lesser offense under Iranian law. In February 2024, the Iranian judiciary announced the verdict, sentencing Iravani to 65 years in prison for his involvement in smuggling auto parts, disrupting the economy, and bribing officials.

Offshore Assets and International Scrutiny

Investigations revealed that Iravani owned an office in Dubai’s Aspect Tower worth approximately $650,000. This discovery was part of the “Dubai Unlocked” project, which exposed the extent of property ownership by Iranian elites in the United Arab Emirates. The revelations have intensified concerns about the use of offshore assets to conceal illicit wealth and evade domestic scrutiny .

Release and Ongoing Controversies

In April 2025, reports emerged that Iravani had been released from prison and handed over to a special bailiff. This move, reportedly aimed at preventing disruptions to production, trade, and transactions, has sparked debates about the consistency and fairness of Iran’s judicial system, especially concerning high-profile individuals

Risk Assessment and Reputational Implications

The allegations against Iravani pose significant risks to consumer trust and the integrity of Iran’s automotive supply chain. The purported bribery of customs officials undermines regulatory frameworks designed to protect consumers and ensure fair market practices. Iravani’s associations with political elites and his involvement in high-profile philanthropic activities may suffer reputational damage due to the allegations, potentially impacting public perception and stakeholder confidence. The international attention garnered by the case could affect Iran’s broader economic relations and the perceived reliability of its business environment. The case underscores the challenges within Iran’s legal system in addressing high-level corruption, particularly when political considerations may influence judicial outcomes. Potential international legal implications could arise if any of the alleged activities involved cross-border financial transactions or violations of international sanctions.

Conclusion:

The case of Abbas Reza Iravani exemplifies the complexities of addressing corruption within intertwined political and economic systems. While the full extent of his alleged misconduct remains subject to legal adjudication, the available information highlights significant concerns regarding corporate governance, regulatory enforcement, and the influence of political affiliations in business operations. For stakeholders and observers, this case serves as a cautionary tale about the importance of transparency, accountability, and the rule of law in fostering a trustworthy economic environment.

How Was This Done?

The fake DMCA notices we found always use the ? back-dated article? technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a ? true original? article and back-dates it, creating a ? fake original? article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original.

What Happens Next?

The fake DMCA notices we found always use the ? back-dated article? technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a ? true original? article and back-dates it, creating a ? fake original? article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original.

01

Inform Google about the fake DMCA scam

Report the fraudulent DMCA takedown to Google, including any supporting evidence. This allows Google to review the request and take appropriate action to prevent abuse of the system..

02

Share findings with journalists and media

Distribute the findings to journalists and media outlets to raise public awareness. Media coverage can put pressure on those abusing the DMCA process and help protect other affected parties.

03

Inform Lumen Database

Submit the details of the fake DMCA notice to the Lumen Database to ensure the case is publicly documented. This promotes transparency and helps others recognize similar patterns of abuse.

04

File counter notice to reinstate articles

Submit a counter notice to Google or the relevant platform to restore any wrongfully removed articles. Ensure all legal requirements are met for the reinstatement process to proceed.

05

Increase exposure to critical articles

Re-share or promote the affected articles to recover visibility. Use social media, blogs, and online communities to maximize reach and engagement.

06

Expand investigation to identify similar fake DMCAs

Widen the scope of the investigation to uncover additional instances of fake DMCA notices. Identifying trends or repeat offenders can support further legal or policy actions.

learnallrightbg
shield icon

Learn All About Fake Copyright Takedown Scam

Or go directly to the feedback section and share your thoughts

Add Comment Or Feedback

User Reviews

Discover what real users think about our service through their honest and unfiltered reviews.

0

Average Ratings

Based on 0 Ratings

★ 1
0%
★ 2
0%
★ 3
0%
★ 4
0%
★ 5
0%

Add Reviews

  • Trust
  • Risk
  • Brand

learnallrightbg
shield icon

You are Never Alone in Your Fight

Generate public support against the ones who wronged you!

Our Community
View More Threat Alerts

Website Reviews

Stop fraud before it happens with unbeatable speed, scale, depth, and breadth.

Recent Reviews

Cyber Investigation

Uncover hidden digital threats and secure your assets with our expert cyber investigation services.

Recent Reviews

Threat Alerts

Stay ahead of cyber threats with our daily list of the latest alerts and vulnerabilities.

Recent Reviews

Client Dashboard

Your trusted source for breaking news and insights on cybercrime and digital security trends.

Recent Reviews