CyberCriminal.com

Cobratate

We are investigating Cobratate for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices. This includes potential violations such as impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

PARTIES INVOLVED : Cobratate

ALLEGATIONS : Perjury, Fraud, Impersonation

INCIDENT DATE : 15 Aug 2024

INVESTIGATED BY : Ethan Katz

TOOLS USED : Lumen, FakeDMCA, SecurityTrails

CASE NO : 1421/A/2024

CRIME TYPE : Intellectual Property Scam

PUBLISHED ON : 25 Aug 2024

Cobratate
Due Diligence
Get everything we know about Cobratate in one downloadable PDF document
Is This About You?
We encourage you to share details of the actual perpetrators and get your story straight.

What We Are Investigating?

Our firm is launching a comprehensive investigation into Cobratate over allegations that it has been suppressing critical reviews and unfavorable Google search results by fraudulently misusing DMCA takedown notices. These actions, if proven, could constitute serious legal violations—including impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

We conducted comprehensive analyses of fraudulent copyright takedown requests, meritless legal complaints, and other unlawful efforts to suppress public access to critical information. Our reporting sheds light on the prevalence and modus operandi of a structured censorship network, often funded and used by criminal enterprises, oligarchs and criminal entities seeking to manipulate public perception and bypass AML checks conducted by financial organisations.

The fake DMCA notices in this investigation appears to have been strategically deployed to remove negative content from Google search results illegally. Based on this pattern, we have reasonable grounds to infer that Cobratate - or an entity acting at its behest - is directly or indirectly complicit in this cyber crime.

In most such cases, such ops are executed by rogue, fly-by-night 'Online Reputation Management' agencies acting on behalf of their clients. If evidence establishes that the subject knowingly benefited from or facilitated this scam, it may be deemed an 'accomplice' or an 'accessory' to the crime.

What are they trying to censor

Cobratate, a brand associated with controversial internet personality Andrew Tate, has been embroiled in a series of allegations, red flags, and adverse news reports that have significantly damaged its reputation. Known for its provocative content and lifestyle branding, Cobratate has faced widespread criticism for promoting toxic masculinity, misogyny, and unethical business practices. Below is a summary of the major allegations and adverse reports, along with an analysis of their impact on Cobratate’s reputation and the potential motivations for suppressing such information.

Major Allegations and Adverse News
Promotion of Toxic Masculinity and Misogyny:
Cobratate has been widely criticized for promoting harmful ideologies, including toxic masculinity and misogyny. Andrew Tate’s controversial statements about women, relationships, and gender roles have sparked outrage and led to accusations of fostering a culture of disrespect and discrimination.
Allegations of Exploitation and Scams:
Former associates and customers have accused Cobratate of running exploitative schemes, particularly through its online courses and membership programs. Critics claim that these programs overpromise results, such as financial success or social dominance, while delivering little value. Some have labeled these practices as predatory and deceptive.
Human Trafficking and Sexual Exploitation Allegations:
Andrew Tate, the face of Cobratate, has faced serious allegations of human trafficking and sexual exploitation. In 2022, he was arrested in Romania as part of an investigation into these claims. While the case is ongoing, the allegations have cast a dark shadow over the Cobratate brand and its association with Tate.
Banned from Social Media Platforms:
Cobratate and Andrew Tate have been banned from multiple social media platforms, including Twitter, YouTube, and Instagram, for violating community guidelines. These bans were largely due to the spread of hateful and misogynistic content, further tarnishing the brand’s image.
Legal and Regulatory Issues:
Cobratate has faced scrutiny for operating in legal gray areas, particularly in its financial dealings and online content. Critics have raised concerns about the lack of transparency in its business practices and the potential for legal repercussions.
Negative Influence on Young Audiences:
Cobratate has been accused of targeting vulnerable young men with its messaging, promoting unrealistic and harmful ideals of success, wealth, and masculinity. This has led to widespread criticism from educators, mental health professionals, and advocacy groups.

Impact on Reputation
The allegations against Cobratate have severely harmed its reputation, portraying the brand as a promoter of toxic ideologies and unethical practices. The association with Andrew Tate’s legal troubles, particularly the human trafficking allegations, has further damaged its credibility. The bans from social media platforms and the negative publicity have alienated potential supporters and partners, making it difficult for Cobratate to maintain its influence and revenue streams. In an era where public perception is critical, such reputational damage can have long-lasting consequences.

Motivations for Suppressing Information

Given the damaging nature of these allegations, Cobratate has a strong incentive to suppress negative information. Stories about toxic masculinity, exploitation, and legal troubles threaten its ability to attract new followers and customers, which are essential for its business model. By removing or discrediting such reports, Cobratate could aim to control the narrative, protect its image, and avoid further scrutiny.

In extreme cases, this motivation might lead to unethical or illegal actions, such as cybercrime. For instance, hacking into the systems of critics or media outlets to remove damaging content, or deploying disinformation campaigns to discredit whistleblowers, could be seen as a way to silence opposition. While such actions would be illegal and further damage Cobratate’s reputation if uncovered, the immediate goal would be to eliminate threats to its brand and revenue.

Conclusion

The allegations against Cobratate paint a troubling picture of a brand associated with toxic ideologies, exploitation, and legal controversies. These issues have severely damaged its reputation, making it a target for public scrutiny, legal action, and loss of trust among potential followers. The reputational harm provides a clear motive for Cobratate to suppress negative information, even if it means resorting to cybercrime. However, such actions would only compound its ethical and legal challenges, perpetuating a cycle of misconduct and cover-ups. Ultimately, the allegations against Cobratate underscore the urgent need for greater accountability and ethical responsibility in its operations, without which its reputation and future will remain in jeopardy.

  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/43825844
  • Aug 15, 2024
  • Chenmao Co., Ltd
  • https://www.cobratate.com/
  • https://www.forexpeacearmy.com/community/threads/cobratate-com-forex-signal-provider-is-a-scam-formidable-forex-powerhouse.64872/page-3

Evidence Box

Evidence and relevant screenshots related to our investigation

Targeted Content and Red Flags

intelligenceline.com

Cobratate Fraud: Investigating Deceptive Tactics and Financial Deception

  • Red Flag
Visit Link

scam-detector.com

Is cobratate.com Legit?

  • Adverse News
Visit Link

forexpeacearmy.com

Formidable Forex Powerhouse Signal Service Scam by Cobratate.com - My Case

  • Adverse News
Visit Link

About the Author

The author is affiliated with TU Dresden and analyzes public databases such as Lumen Database and FakeDMCA.com to identify and expose online censorship. In his personal capacity, he and his team have been actively investigating and reporting on organized crime related to fraudulent copyright takedown schemes.

Additionally, his team provides advisory services to major law firms and is frequently consulted on matters pertaining to intellectual property law.

He can be reached at [email protected] directly.

Escalate This Case
Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.
Checkboxes

Learn All About Fake Copyright Takedown Scam

Or go directly to the feedback section and share your thoughts

How This Was Done

The fake DMCA notices we found always use the 'back-dated article' technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a 'true original' article and back-dates it, creating a 'fake original' article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original

What Happens Next?

Based on the feedback, information, and requests received from all relevant parties, our team will formally notify the affected party of the alleged infringement. Following a thorough review, we will submit a counter-notice to reinstate any link that has been removed by Google, in accordance with applicable legal provisions. Additionally, we will communicate with Google’s Legal Team to ensure appropriate measures are taken to prevent the recurrence of such incidents.

You are Never Alone in Your Fight.

Generate public support against the ones who wronged you!

Domain Check

Stop fraud before it happens with unbeatable speed, scale, depth, and breadth.

Recent Checks

Cyber Investigation

Uncover hidden digital threats and secure your assets with our expert cyber investigation services.

Recent Investigation

Our Community

Your trusted source for breaking news and insights on cybercrime and digital security trends.

Visit Forum

Threads Alert

Stay ahead of cyber threats with our daily list of the latest alerts and vulnerabilities.

Threads Alert