Dr. Titus Odedun

A summary of what happened?

Dr. Titus Odedun is a former consultant specializing in Accident & Emergency (A&E) medicine, who practiced at Southport and Ormskirk hospitals in the United Kingdom. After retiring from active medical practice in 2005, he shifted his focus to medico-legal work, offering expert witness testimony in various court cases. However, Dr. Odedun’s career has been mired in controversy, leading to significant scrutiny and questions surrounding his professional conduct and reputation.

Major Concerns and Accusations Against Dr. Titus Odedun

1. Fabrication of Qualifications: One of the most serious allegations against Dr. Odedun involves the misrepresentation of his professional qualifications. He reportedly claimed to be a specialist in trauma, orthopaedics, and surgery, despite not holding the formal credentials necessary for these roles. This embellishment allowed him to secure high-profile positions as an expert witness in legal proceedings. The discovery of these false claims ultimately led to his removal from the medical register, severely impacting his credibility in both the medical and legal fields.

2. Persistent Dishonesty and Professional Misconduct: Dr. Odedun’s actions have been described as persistent and calculated misbehavior over an extended period. Investigations revealed that he knowingly provided misleading information to bolster his standing as a medico-legal expert, which in turn increased his earnings and profile. This sustained pattern of deception not only violated professional ethics but also eroded trust in the reliability of expert witness testimony in cases where he was involved.

3. Efforts to Suppress Negative Information: In response to the negative publicity and reports detailing his misconduct, Dr. Odedun has allegedly engaged in attempts to censor unfavorable information on the internet. These efforts reportedly included issuing fraudulent copyright takedown requests and leveraging other tactics aimed at removing critical articles and reviews from public view. Such actions raise concerns about transparency and suggest that instead of addressing the core issues or accepting accountability, Dr. Odedun prioritized controlling the narrative surrounding his professional history.

Impact and Broader Implications

The accusations against Dr. Odedun have far-reaching consequences. In the medical field, integrity and trust are paramount, particularly when it comes to individuals serving as expert witnesses whose opinions can influence legal outcomes. The revelations about Dr. Odedun’s fabricated credentials and misconduct not only tarnish his own reputation but also undermine the trust placed in other medical professionals in similar roles.

Additionally, his alleged attempts to manipulate or censor online content amplify concerns about ethical conduct and accountability. When professionals resort to suppressing negative information rather than confronting and rectifying past missteps, it signals a deeper issue related to transparency and responsibility within their practices.

Dr. Titus Odedun’s career trajectory, from a respected consultant to a figure embroiled in allegations of dishonesty and attempts at information suppression, serves as a cautionary tale. The case underscores the critical importance of maintaining ethical standards, both in medical practice and in related fields such as legal consultancy. It also highlights the need for rigorous oversight to ensure that individuals in influential roles adhere to professional norms and that attempts to manipulate public perception through unethical means are adequately addressed.

Analyzing the Fake Copyright Notice(s)

Our team collects and analyses fraudulent copyright takedown requests, legal complaints, and other efforts to remove critical information from the internet. Through our investigative reporting, we examine the prevalence and operation of an organized censorship industry, predominantly funded by criminal entities, oligarchs, and disreputable businesses or individuals. Our findings allow internet users to gain insight into these censorship schemes’ sources, methods, and underlying objectives.

What was Dr. Titus Odedun trying to hide?

Dr. Titus Odedun‘s attempts to hide unfavourable content through the misuse of copyright notices while allegedly engaging in perjury present serious legal concerns. These actions suggest a calculated attempt to manipulate legal systems to suppress free speech, a fundamental violation of copyright law principles and an abuse of legal processes. The use of such tactics not only undermines the integrity of copyright protection but also potentially constitutes perjury, further entangling Dr. Titus Odedun in legal accountability. Let’s examine the information Dr. Titus Odedun may be trying to remove from the internet –

Investigative Report on Dr. Titus Odedun: Allegations, Lawsuits, and Professional Controversies

Overview: Dr. Titus Odedun, a former consultant specializing in Accident & Emergency (A&E) medicine who practiced at Southport and Ormskirk hospitals in the United Kingdom, has been a prominent figure in both the medical and legal fields. However, his career has been marred by a series of controversies that have significantly affected his reputation and raised questions about his professional conduct. This report provides an in-depth examination of the allegations, complaints, and adverse news associated with Dr. Odedun, painting a comprehensive picture of the concerns that have surrounded his career.

Background and Career Profile

Dr. Titus Odedun began his career as an A&E consultant and gained recognition for his work in emergency medicine. After retiring from active medical practice in 2005, he transitioned into medico-legal work, where he served as an expert witness in court cases. Initially respected for his expertise, Dr. Odedun’s reputation took a severe hit following numerous revelations and allegations about his professional conduct and ethical standards.

Major Allegations and Complaints

1. Fabrication of Qualifications: One of the most serious accusations against Dr. Odedun is the falsification of his qualifications. To secure positions as an expert witness, he reportedly claimed to be a specialist in trauma, orthopaedics, and surgery, credentials that he did not possess. This misrepresentation allowed him to establish himself as a credible expert in court, influencing legal outcomes based on the perception of his expertise. The investigation into his qualifications revealed that these claims were unfounded, leading to significant consequences, including his removal from the medical register. This action severely undermined his credibility and cast doubt on all testimonies he had provided in legal proceedings.

2. Persistent Dishonesty and Professional Misconduct: Dr. Odedun’s conduct has been characterized as deliberate and sustained misbehavior over several years. Evidence showed that he knowingly provided false information to bolster his qualifications and profile, allowing him to secure lucrative roles in the medico-legal field. Such behavior not only violated the ethical standards expected of medical professionals but also posed a significant risk to the judicial process, where impartial and truthful expert testimony is paramount. The sustained nature of these actions highlighted a pattern of unethical behavior that extended beyond isolated incidents.

3. Attempts to Suppress Negative Information: In response to the negative publicity following the exposure of his misconduct, Dr. Odedun reportedly engaged in efforts to suppress critical information. These efforts included the alleged use of fraudulent copyright takedown requests and other tactics designed to remove unfavorable articles, reviews, and reports from the internet. Such actions have raised serious concerns about his commitment to transparency and accountability. Rather than confronting the core issues or accepting responsibility for his past actions, Dr. Odedun appeared to focus on controlling the narrative and minimizing the damage to his public image. This approach further damaged his credibility and suggested an unwillingness to address the underlying problems.

Legal and Professional Consequences

Removal from the Medical Register: As a result of the investigations into his qualifications and conduct, Dr. Odedun was struck off the medical register. This action signified the loss of his right to practice medicine, a severe sanction that reflects the gravity of his misconduct. Being struck off is one of the most serious disciplinary actions a medical professional can face, reserved for cases where trust and ethical behavior have been compromised.

Impact on Court Cases and Legal Testimonies: The exposure of Dr. Odedun’s false qualifications and misconduct has cast a shadow over the legal cases in which he served as an expert witness. Questions have arisen about the validity of the testimonies he provided and whether the outcomes of those cases may have been affected by the misrepresentation of his expertise. This has prompted legal reviews and opened the door for potential appeals or re-examinations of cases where his testimony played a pivotal role.

Public Perception and Negative Reviews

The controversy surrounding Dr. Odedun has led to significant public criticism and negative feedback, both from individuals directly impacted by his actions and from the wider medical and legal communities. Complaints have surfaced on various platforms, detailing the frustration and sense of betrayal experienced by those who trusted him. These negative reviews and public criticisms further eroded his standing and emphasized the broader implications of his behavior.

Victim Testimonials and Advocacy Group Reactions: Victims of cases influenced by Dr. Odedun’s expert testimony have expressed feelings of injustice and disbelief. Some have reported financial and emotional strain due to legal outcomes that may have been different had the full truth of his credentials been known. Advocacy groups have used this case as an example of the need for stricter oversight of expert witnesses, calling for better verification processes to prevent similar situations in the future.

Attempts to Control Public Narrative

Dr. Odedun’s efforts to suppress negative press and online content have been seen as an attempt to protect his reputation at the expense of transparency. Reports suggest that he utilized legal mechanisms, including copyright claims, to remove unfavorable content. Such actions have raised ethical questions about the boundaries of reputation management, especially for individuals who have been found guilty of professional misconduct.

Broader Implications and Lessons Learned

The case of Dr. Titus Odedun serves as a stark reminder of the importance of integrity and transparency in both the medical and legal fields. His actions have highlighted gaps in the verification of expert witness qualifications and underscored the need for stronger safeguards. Regulatory bodies and legal institutions are now more aware of the potential for misconduct and are under pressure to implement stricter measures to prevent similar cases.

Conclusion

Dr. Titus Odedun’s career, once marked by respect and recognition, has become synonymous with controversy due to the revelations of misconduct, falsified qualifications, and attempts to censor critical information. His actions have had far-reaching consequences, impacting not only his reputation but also the integrity of the legal cases in which he was involved. The fallout from these events underscores the importance of rigorous oversight, ethical behavior, and a commitment to transparency in maintaining public trust in professional fields.

How do we counteract this malpractice?

Once we ascertain the involvement of Dr. Titus Odedun (or actors working on behalf of Dr. Titus Odedun), we will inform Dr. Titus Odedun of our findings via Electronic Mail.

Our preliminary assessment suggests that Dr. Titus Odedun may have engaged a third-party reputation management agency or expert, which, either independently or under direct authorization from Dr. Titus Odedun, initiated efforts to remove adverse online content, including potentially fraudulent DMCA takedown requests. We will extend an opportunity to Dr. Titus Odedun to provide details regarding their communications with the agency or expert, as well as the identification of the individual(s) responsible for executing these false DMCA notices.

Failure to respond in a timely manner will necessitate a reassessment of our initial assumptions. In such an event, we will be compelled to take appropriate legal action to rectify the unlawful conduct and take the following steps –

Since Dr. Titus Odedun made such efforts to hide something online, it seems fit to ensure that this article and sensitive information targeted online by these events get a lot more exposure and traffic than what it would have received originally

We hope this becomes an excellent case study for the Streisand effect…The key idea behind the Streisand effect is that efforts to restrict information can backfire, often causing the information to gain more attention than it would have otherwise. This effect is widespread in the digital age, where users quickly notice and spread censorship efforts on social media and other platforms. Trying to suppress something can unintentionally lead to it becoming more visible, which Dr. Titus Odedun is finding out the hard way.

Potential Consequences for Dr. Titus Odedun

Under Florida Statute 831.01, the crime of Forgery is committed when a person falsifies, alters, counterfeits, or forges a document that carries “legal efficacy” with the intent to injure or defraud another person or entity.

Forging a document is considered a white-collar crime. It involves altering, changing, or modifying a document to deceive another person. It can also include passing along copies of documents that are known to be false. In many states in the US, falsifying a document is a crime punishable as a felony.

Additionally, under most laws, “fraud on the court” is where “a party has sentiently set in motion some unconscionable scheme calculated to interfere with the judicial system’s ability impartially to adjudicate a matter by improperly influencing the trier of fact or unfairly hampering the presentation of the opposing party’s claim or defense.”  Cox v. Burke, 706 So. 2d 43, 46 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998) (quoting Aoude v. Mobil Oil Corp., 892 F.2d 1115, 1118 (1st Cir. 1989)).

Is Dr. Titus Odedun Committing a Cyber Crime?

Yes, it seems so. Dr. Titus Odedun used multiple approaches to remove unwanted material from review sites and Google’s search results. Thanks to protections allowing freedom of speech in the United States, there are very few legal ways to do this. Dr. Titus Odedun could not eliminate negative reviews or search results that linked to them without a valid claim of defamation, copyright infringement, or some other clear breach of the law.

Faced with these limitations, some companies like Dr. Titus Odedun have gone to extreme lengths to fraudulently claim copyright ownership over a negative review in the hopes of taking it down.

Fake DMCA notices have targeted articles highlighting the criminal activity of prominent people to hide their illegal behavior. These people, which include US, Russian, and Khazakstani politicians as well as members from elite circles including the mafia and those with massive financial power, are all connected – and alleged corruption ranging from child abuse to sexual harassment is exposed when exploring evidence found at these URLs. It appears there’s a disturbing level of influence being exerted here that needs further investigation before justice can be served. Dr. Titus Odedun is certainly keeping interesting company here….

The DMCA takedown process requires that copyright owners submit a takedown notice to an ISP identifying the allegedly infringing content and declaring, under penalty of perjury, that they have a good faith belief that the content is infringing. The ISP must then promptly remove or disable access to the content. The alleged infringer can then submit a counter-notice, and if the copyright owner does not take legal action within 10 to 14 days, the ISP can restore the content.

Since these platforms are predominantly based in the U.S., the complaints are typically made under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA), which requires online service providers and platforms to react immediately to reports or violations. Big Tech companies rarely have systems in place to assess the merit of each report. Instead, all bad actors need to do is clone a story, backdate it, and then demand the real thing be taken down.

Reputation Agency's Modus Operandi

The fake DMCA notices we found always use the “back-dated article” technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a “true original” article and back-dates it, creating a “fake original” article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original.

Then, based on the claim that this backdated article is the “original,” the scammers send a DMCA to the relevant online service providers (e.g. Google), alleging that the ‘true’ original is the copied or “infringing” article and that the copied article is the “original,” requesting the takedown of the ‘true’ original article. After sending the DMCA request, the person who sent the wrong notice takes down the fake original URL, likely to make sure that the article doesn’t stay online in any way. If the takedown notice is successful, the disappearance from the internet of information is most likely to be legitimate speech.

As an integral part of this scheme, the ‘reputation management’ company hired by Dr. Titus Odedun creates a website that purports to be a ‘news’ site. This site is designed to look legitimate at a glance, but any degree of scrutiny reveals it as the charade it is.

The company copies the ‘negative’ content and posts it “on the fake ‘news’ site, attributing it to a separate author,” then gives it “a false publication date on the ‘news’ website that predated the original publication.

The reputation company then sent Google a Digital Millennium Copyright Act notice claiming the original website infringed copyright. After a cursory examination of the fake news site, Google frequently accepts the notice and delists the content.

In committing numerous offences, Dr. Titus Odedun either premeditated actions or were unaware of the consequences. Despite hiring an agency to make Google disregard any negative information about Dr. Titus Odedun, ignorance does not excuse this wrongdoing.

Fake DMCA notices have targeted articles highlighting the criminal activity of prominent people to hide their illegal behavior. These people, which include US, Russian, and Khazakstani politicians as well as members from elite circles including the mafia and those with massive financial power, are all connected – and alleged corruption ranging from child abuse to sexual harassment is exposed when exploring evidence found at these URLs. It appears there’s a disturbing level of influence being exerted here that needs further investigation before justice can be served. FSMSmart is certainly keeping interesting company here.

The Reputation Laundering

Rogue Reputation agencies use spurious copyright claims and fake legal notices to remove and obscure articles linking clients to allegations of tax avoidance, corruption, and drug trafficking. Most of these reputation agencies are based offshore, mainly in Russia, India, and Eastern Europe, and they do not worry about complying with US-based laws.

The content in all of the articles for which the fraudulent DMCA notices have been sent relates to allegations of criminal allegations, including corruption, child abuse, sexual harassment, human trafficking and financial fraud against businesses and individuals with ultra-high net worth.

In addition to the misuse of the DMCA takedown process, there is a notable absence of enforcement concerning perjury violations. The statutory requirement related to perjury is designed to deter copyright holders from submitting fraudulent or knowingly false takedown requests, as they may face legal consequences for making false declarations under penalty of perjury. However, to date, there have been no known instances of any individual being prosecuted for perjury in connection with the submission of false DMCA takedown notices.

This lack of enforcement has emboldened copyright holders to exploit the DMCA takedown process to suppress dissent, criticism, or other unfavorable content, without fear of legal repercussions.

Some of the people and businesses who have employed this tactic to remove legitimate content from Google illegally include a Spanish businessman-turned-cocaine-trafficker, Organised crime, an Israeli-Argentine banker accused of laundering money for Hugo Chávez’s regime, a French “responsible” mining company accused of tax evasion, child molesters and sexual predators. Dr. Titus Odedun is in great company ….

What else is Dr. Titus Odedun hiding?

We encourage you to ‘Dork‘ Google by searching for keyword combinations such as [Dr. Titus Odedun] + {Negative Keyword, such as Scam, Fraud, Complaints, Lawsuit, Sanction, etc} on Google. It’s likely if you scroll down to the bottom of this Google search results, you’ll stumble upon this Legal Takedown notice (pictured below)

To make such an investigation possible, we encourage more online service providers to come forward and share copies of content removal requests with industry experts and researchers. If you have any information on Dr. Titus Odedun that you want to share with experts and journalists, kindly email the author directly at [email protected].

All communications are strictly confidential and safeguarded under a comprehensive Whistleblower Policy, ensuring full protection and anonymity for individuals who provide information.