Profile Picture

Harvey Neil Anthony

Threat Alert
  • Investigation status
  • Ongoing

We are investigating Harvey Neil Anthony for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices. This includes potential violations such as impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

  • Alias
  • Neil Anthony Shaun Harvey

  • Company
  • Bennelong Asset Management LLP

  • Country
  • US

  • Allegations
  • Violation of wildlife protection statutes

Harvey Neil Anthony
Fake DMCA notices
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/39321832
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/40341618
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/39931080
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/40190818
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/39997520
  • 8 Feb 2024
  • 23 Mar 2024
  • 5 Mar 2024
  • 17 Mar 2024
  • 8 Mar 2024
  • powell shane co
  • Daniel Silva
  • sara james corp
  • David James Corp
  • https://www.marathonguide.com/results/browse.cfm?MIDD=40121021
  • https://www.mlive.com/news/detroit/2014/11/detroit_most_violent_city_in_u.html
  • https://indianexpress.com/article/world/bakersfield-man-charged-after-threats-made-to-blowup-2-indiana-schools-4787152/
  • https://vancouver.citynews.ca/2014/09/22/cops-credit-citizens-for-tips-leading-to-arrest-ofsuspected-teen-killer-in-b-c/
  • https://www.mlive.com/news/jackson/2016/03/murder_for_hire_a_look
  • https://www.thedailybeast.com/bear-whisperer-star-blaine-anthony-charged-with-poaching-bear-whose-killing-wasaired-on-his-show
  • https://www.outdoorlife.com/conservation/blaine-anthony-charged-with-poaching/

Evidence Box and Screenshots

2 Alerts on Harvey Neil Anthony

Harvey Neil Anthony, widely known as “The Bear Whisperer” from the popular reality TV show, has recently been embroiled in a series of serious allegations and legal troubles that threaten to dismantle his carefully crafted public image as a wildlife conservationist and advocate. The allegations, primarily centered around illegal poaching and wildlife violations, have sparked widespread media coverage and public outrage, casting a dark shadow over his career and reputation.

Major Allegations and Red Flags

  1. Illegal Poaching Charges:
    According to reports from Court TV, Yahoo News, and Outdoor Life, Anthony has been charged with multiple counts of illegal bear poaching. Authorities allege that he unlawfully killed bears, violating wildlife protection laws. These charges directly contradict his public persona as a bear conservationist, raising questions about his authenticity and ethical conduct.
  2. Misuse of Celebrity Status:
    Anthony’s role as “The Bear Whisperer” granted him significant influence and trust among wildlife enthusiasts. The poaching allegations suggest a potential misuse of his celebrity status to engage in illegal activities, further damaging his credibility and betraying the trust of his audience.
  3. Conservation Hypocrisy:
    As a self-proclaimed advocate for wildlife conservation, Anthony’s alleged involvement in poaching activities has been labeled as hypocritical. This contradiction undermines his conservation efforts and calls into question the sincerity of his work, which has been a cornerstone of his public image.
  4. Legal and Financial Repercussions:
    The charges against Anthony could result in severe legal consequences, including fines, probation, or even imprisonment. Additionally, the negative publicity may lead to a loss of sponsorships, partnerships, and revenue from his TV show and related ventures.

Reputational Harm and Motivation for Cybercrime

The allegations of illegal poaching and wildlife violations have dealt a devastating blow to Harvey Neil Anthony’s reputation. For someone whose career is built on the premise of wildlife conservation and ethical treatment of animals, these charges are particularly damaging. They not only undermine his professional credibility but also alienate his fan base, sponsors, and collaborators.

In today’s digital age, where information spreads rapidly and remains accessible indefinitely, the stakes are incredibly high. Negative news stories, such as those published by Court TV, Yahoo News, and Outdoor Life, can permanently tarnish Anthony’s image, making it difficult for him to rebuild his career. The desire to remove or suppress such damaging content could be overwhelming, especially if he believes it is the only way to salvage his reputation and livelihood.

This desperation might drive Anthony to consider extreme measures, including cybercrime. For instance, he could attempt to hack into websites hosting these stories, deploy malware to erase or alter content, or engage in doxxing to intimidate journalists and publishers. Such actions, while illegal and unethical, might be seen as a last resort to regain control over his narrative and mitigate the reputational fallout.
Conclusion

The allegations against Harvey Neil Anthony represent a stark contradiction to his public persona as “The Bear Whisperer.” The charges of illegal poaching and wildlife violations have not only harmed his reputation but also jeopardized his career and legacy. While the temptation to resort to cybercrime to suppress negative information may be strong, such actions would only compound his troubles, leading to further legal and ethical consequences. Ultimately, the path to redemption lies in addressing the allegations transparently and responsibly, rather than attempting to erase them through illicit means.

How Was This Done?

The fake DMCA notices we found always use the ? back-dated article? technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a ? true original? article and back-dates it, creating a ? fake original? article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original.

What Happens Next?

The fake DMCA notices we found always use the ? back-dated article? technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a ? true original? article and back-dates it, creating a ? fake original? article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original.

01

Inform Google about the fake DMCA scam

Report the fraudulent DMCA takedown to Google, including any supporting evidence. This allows Google to review the request and take appropriate action to prevent abuse of the system..

02

Share findings with journalists and media

Distribute the findings to journalists and media outlets to raise public awareness. Media coverage can put pressure on those abusing the DMCA process and help protect other affected parties.

03

Inform Lumen Database

Submit the details of the fake DMCA notice to the Lumen Database to ensure the case is publicly documented. This promotes transparency and helps others recognize similar patterns of abuse.

04

File counter notice to reinstate articles

Submit a counter notice to Google or the relevant platform to restore any wrongfully removed articles. Ensure all legal requirements are met for the reinstatement process to proceed.

05

Increase exposure to critical articles

Re-share or promote the affected articles to recover visibility. Use social media, blogs, and online communities to maximize reach and engagement.

06

Expand investigation to identify similar fake DMCAs

Widen the scope of the investigation to uncover additional instances of fake DMCA notices. Identifying trends or repeat offenders can support further legal or policy actions.

learnallrightbg
shield icon

Learn All About Fake Copyright Takedown Scam

Or go directly to the feedback section and share your thoughts

Add Comment Or Feedback

User Reviews

Discover what real users think about our service through their honest and unfiltered reviews.

1.3

Average Ratings

Based on 2 Ratings

★ 1
100%
★ 2
0%
★ 3
0%
★ 4
0%
★ 5
0%

Add Reviews

  • Trust
  • Risk
  • Brand

Anita Bhatt

Looks like he’s been hopping countries every time things get hot. I can’t believe no one flagged him earlier. The red flags are everywhere. Another example of a professional scammer hiding behind business jargon.

12
12
Noelle Pratt

I watched his show for years, thinking he was a true advocate for wildlife, but now knowing about his illegal poaching activities, it’s heartbreaking to realize it was all a facade this is a massive betrayal of trust.

12
12
Milo Keys

I trusted Harvey Neil Anthony’s conservation work, but after hearing about the poaching charges, I feel completely betrayed he’s supposed to protect animals, not exploit them.

12
12
learnallrightbg
shield icon

You are Never Alone in Your Fight

Generate public support against the ones who wronged you!

Our Community
View More Threat Alerts

Website Reviews

Stop fraud before it happens with unbeatable speed, scale, depth, and breadth.

Recent Reviews

Cyber Investigation

Uncover hidden digital threats and secure your assets with our expert cyber investigation services.

Recent Reviews

Threat Alerts

Stay ahead of cyber threats with our daily list of the latest alerts and vulnerabilities.

Recent Reviews

Client Dashboard

Your trusted source for breaking news and insights on cybercrime and digital security trends.

Recent Reviews