CyberCriminal.com

Harvey Neil Anthony

We are investigating Harvey Neil Anthony for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices. This includes potential violations such as impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

PARTIES INVOLVED : Harvey Neil Anthony

ALLEGATIONS : Perjury, Fraud, Impersonation

INCIDENT DATE : 8 Feb 2024

INVESTIGATED BY : Ethan Katz

TOOLS USED : Lumen, FakeDMCA, SecurityTrails

CASE NO : 1794/A/2024

CRIME TYPE : Intellectual Property Scam

PUBLISHED ON : 23 Nov 2024

Harvey Neil Anthony
Due Diligence
Get everything we know about Harvey Neil Anthony in one downloadable PDF document
Is This About You?
We encourage you to share details of the actual perpetrators and get your story straight.

What We Are Investigating?

Our firm is launching a comprehensive investigation into Harvey Neil Anthony over allegations that it has been suppressing critical reviews and unfavorable Google search results by fraudulently misusing DMCA takedown notices. These actions, if proven, could constitute serious legal violations—including impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

We conducted comprehensive analyses of fraudulent copyright takedown requests, meritless legal complaints, and other unlawful efforts to suppress public access to critical information. Our reporting sheds light on the prevalence and modus operandi of a structured censorship network, often funded and used by criminal enterprises, oligarchs and criminal entities seeking to manipulate public perception and bypass AML checks conducted by financial organisations.

The fake DMCA notices in this investigation appears to have been strategically deployed to remove negative content from Google search results illegally. Based on this pattern, we have reasonable grounds to infer that Harvey Neil Anthony - or an entity acting at its behest - is directly or indirectly complicit in this cyber crime.

In most such cases, such ops are executed by rogue, fly-by-night 'Online Reputation Management' agencies acting on behalf of their clients. If evidence establishes that the subject knowingly benefited from or facilitated this scam, it may be deemed an 'accomplice' or an 'accessory' to the crime.

What are they trying to censor

Harvey Neil Anthony, widely known as “The Bear Whisperer” from the popular reality TV show, has recently been embroiled in a series of serious allegations and legal troubles that threaten to dismantle his carefully crafted public image as a wildlife conservationist and advocate. The allegations, primarily centered around illegal poaching and wildlife violations, have sparked widespread media coverage and public outrage, casting a dark shadow over his career and reputation.

Major Allegations and Red Flags

  1. Illegal Poaching Charges:
    According to reports from Court TV, Yahoo News, and Outdoor Life, Anthony has been charged with multiple counts of illegal bear poaching. Authorities allege that he unlawfully killed bears, violating wildlife protection laws. These charges directly contradict his public persona as a bear conservationist, raising questions about his authenticity and ethical conduct.
  2. Misuse of Celebrity Status:
    Anthony’s role as “The Bear Whisperer” granted him significant influence and trust among wildlife enthusiasts. The poaching allegations suggest a potential misuse of his celebrity status to engage in illegal activities, further damaging his credibility and betraying the trust of his audience.
  3. Conservation Hypocrisy:
    As a self-proclaimed advocate for wildlife conservation, Anthony’s alleged involvement in poaching activities has been labeled as hypocritical. This contradiction undermines his conservation efforts and calls into question the sincerity of his work, which has been a cornerstone of his public image.
  4. Legal and Financial Repercussions:
    The charges against Anthony could result in severe legal consequences, including fines, probation, or even imprisonment. Additionally, the negative publicity may lead to a loss of sponsorships, partnerships, and revenue from his TV show and related ventures.

Reputational Harm and Motivation for Cybercrime

The allegations of illegal poaching and wildlife violations have dealt a devastating blow to Harvey Neil Anthony’s reputation. For someone whose career is built on the premise of wildlife conservation and ethical treatment of animals, these charges are particularly damaging. They not only undermine his professional credibility but also alienate his fan base, sponsors, and collaborators.

In today’s digital age, where information spreads rapidly and remains accessible indefinitely, the stakes are incredibly high. Negative news stories, such as those published by Court TV, Yahoo News, and Outdoor Life, can permanently tarnish Anthony’s image, making it difficult for him to rebuild his career. The desire to remove or suppress such damaging content could be overwhelming, especially if he believes it is the only way to salvage his reputation and livelihood.

This desperation might drive Anthony to consider extreme measures, including cybercrime. For instance, he could attempt to hack into websites hosting these stories, deploy malware to erase or alter content, or engage in doxxing to intimidate journalists and publishers. Such actions, while illegal and unethical, might be seen as a last resort to regain control over his narrative and mitigate the reputational fallout.
Conclusion

The allegations against Harvey Neil Anthony represent a stark contradiction to his public persona as “The Bear Whisperer.” The charges of illegal poaching and wildlife violations have not only harmed his reputation but also jeopardized his career and legacy. While the temptation to resort to cybercrime to suppress negative information may be strong, such actions would only compound his troubles, leading to further legal and ethical consequences. Ultimately, the path to redemption lies in addressing the allegations transparently and responsibly, rather than attempting to erase them through illicit means.

  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/39321832
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/40341618
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/39931080
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/40190818
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/39997520
  • 8 Feb 2024
  • 23 Mar 2024
  • 5 Mar 2024
  • 17 Mar 2024
  • 8 Mar 2024
  • powell shane co
  • Daniel Silva
  • sara james corp
  • David James Corp
  • https://www.marathonguide.com/results/browse.cfm?MIDD=40121021
  • https://www.mlive.com/news/detroit/2014/11/detroit_most_violent_city_in_u.html
  • https://indianexpress.com/article/world/bakersfield-man-charged-after-threats-made-to-blowup-2-indiana-schools-4787152/
  • https://vancouver.citynews.ca/2014/09/22/cops-credit-citizens-for-tips-leading-to-arrest-ofsuspected-teen-killer-in-b-c/
  • https://www.mlive.com/news/jackson/2016/03/murder_for_hire_a_look
  • https://www.thedailybeast.com/bear-whisperer-star-blaine-anthony-charged-with-poaching-bear-whose-killing-wasaired-on-his-show
  • https://www.outdoorlife.com/conservation/blaine-anthony-charged-with-poaching/

Evidence Box

Evidence and relevant screenshots related to our investigation

Targeted Content and Red Flags

Out Door Life

“The Bear Whisperer” Host Charged With Poaching Black Bear in a National Park, Airing the Footage on His Show

  • Red Flag
Visit Link

Yahoo

‘Bear Whisperer’ Star Charged With Poaching Bear Whose Killing Was Aired on His Show

  • Adverse News
Visit Link

Courttv

Star of ‘The Bear Whisperer’ accused of illegal bear kill

  • Adverse News
Visit Link

About the Author

The author is affiliated with TU Dresden and analyzes public databases such as Lumen Database and FakeDMCA.com to identify and expose online censorship. In his personal capacity, he and his team have been actively investigating and reporting on organized crime related to fraudulent copyright takedown schemes.

Additionally, his team provides advisory services to major law firms and is frequently consulted on matters pertaining to intellectual property law.

He can be reached at [email protected] directly.

Escalate This Case
Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.
Checkboxes

Learn All About Fake Copyright Takedown Scam

Or go directly to the feedback section and share your thoughts

How This Was Done

The fake DMCA notices we found always use the 'back-dated article' technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a 'true original' article and back-dates it, creating a 'fake original' article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original

What Happens Next?

Based on the feedback, information, and requests received from all relevant parties, our team will formally notify the affected party of the alleged infringement. Following a thorough review, we will submit a counter-notice to reinstate any link that has been removed by Google, in accordance with applicable legal provisions. Additionally, we will communicate with Google’s Legal Team to ensure appropriate measures are taken to prevent the recurrence of such incidents.

You are Never Alone in Your Fight.

Generate public support against the ones who wronged you!

Domain Check

Stop fraud before it happens with unbeatable speed, scale, depth, and breadth.

Recent Checks

Cyber Investigation

Uncover hidden digital threats and secure your assets with our expert cyber investigation services.

Recent Investigation

Our Community

Your trusted source for breaking news and insights on cybercrime and digital security trends.

Visit Forum

Threads Alert

Stay ahead of cyber threats with our daily list of the latest alerts and vulnerabilities.

Threads Alert