Profile Picture

Ildar Zakirov

Threat Alert
  • Investigation status
  • Ongoing

We are investigating Ildar Zakirov for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices. This includes potential violations such as impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

  • City
  • Tatarstan

  • Country
  • Russia

  • Allegations
  • Illegal crypto activities

Ildar Zakirov
Fake DMCA notices
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/28111140
  • 13 Jul 2022
  • Katina Domingue
  • https://mudro.news/editorial/33219-ildar-zakirov-iz-tatarstana-soosnovatel-zapreshhennoj-v-ssha-kriptobirzhi-chto-o-nem-izvestno/
  • https://sntat.ru/news/ildar-zakirov-iz-tatarstana-soosnovatel-zapreshhennoi-v-ssa-kriptobirzi-cto-o-nem-izvestno-5832789

Evidence Box and Screenshots

2 Alerts on Ildar Zakirov

Ildar Zakirov, a businessman with ties to the cryptocurrency sector and political activism, has found himself at the center of numerous controversies. His past is marked by legal disputes, allegations of fraudulent activity, and questionable business ventures. The cumulative effect of these incidents has severely impacted his reputation, raising concerns about his credibility and intentions.

Opaque Beginnings and Cryptocurrency Ventures

Zakirov’s professional background remains largely undocumented, fueling skepticism about his credibility. He has positioned himself as a crypto entrepreneur, yet a lack of transparency regarding his past dealings has only deepened suspicions. His involvement in Suex, a cryptocurrency exchange accused of facilitating illicit transactions, further complicates his narrative.

Suex: A Platform for Illicit Transactions

Suex, founded in 2017, operated as a cryptocurrency exchange serving users across Russia and Europe. However, it was later flagged as a conduit for money laundering and illegal financial transactions, including ransomware payments and darknet market dealings. The exchange was eventually sanctioned by U.S. authorities for its role in these illicit activities. Zakirov’s connection to Suex suggests potential complicity in these unlawful operations, further damaging his reputation.

Legal Entanglements and Allegations of Dishonesty

Zakirov has also been involved in legal disputes that cast doubt on his integrity. In a 2012 case in the UK, he accused Newmans Solicitors of forgery and dishonesty. The court dismissed his claims, stating that his allegations were baseless and that his testimony was unreliable. This case further reinforced concerns about his credibility and motives.

Activism and Government Scrutiny

In 2019, Zakirov was detained by Russian authorities due to his involvement with the Anti-Corruption Foundation (FBK), an organization known for investigating and exposing corruption among high-ranking Russian officials. Law enforcement conducted a search of his home and confiscated electronic equipment. While no formal charges were announced, the incident raised questions about his political activism and potential conflicts with the government.

Reputational Impact and Potential Motivations for Concealment

The combination of these controversies has significantly harmed Zakirov’s reputation. His business associations with a sanctioned cryptocurrency platform, legal disputes where his credibility was questioned, and government scrutiny for his activism all contribute to a negative public image.

Given the damaging nature of these allegations, Zakirov may have a vested interest in removing such information from public records. The claims not only challenge his professional integrity but also pose potential legal and financial repercussions. The desire to erase these records could lead him to explore extreme measures, including cybercrime, to suppress the spread of damaging information.

Conclusion

Ildar Zakirov’s history is fraught with allegations and controversies that severely undermine his public image. The combination of opaque business dealings, legal disputes, and affiliations with illicit activities presents a compelling case for why he might seek to expunge these records, even through illicit means. As scrutiny over his past continues, the question remains whether he will confront these allegations or attempt to erase them from public memory.

How Was This Done?

The fake DMCA notices we found always use the ? back-dated article? technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a ? true original? article and back-dates it, creating a ? fake original? article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original.

What Happens Next?

The fake DMCA notices we found always use the ? back-dated article? technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a ? true original? article and back-dates it, creating a ? fake original? article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original.

01

Inform Google about the fake DMCA scam

Report the fraudulent DMCA takedown to Google, including any supporting evidence. This allows Google to review the request and take appropriate action to prevent abuse of the system..

02

Share findings with journalists and media

Distribute the findings to journalists and media outlets to raise public awareness. Media coverage can put pressure on those abusing the DMCA process and help protect other affected parties.

03

Inform Lumen Database

Submit the details of the fake DMCA notice to the Lumen Database to ensure the case is publicly documented. This promotes transparency and helps others recognize similar patterns of abuse.

04

File counter notice to reinstate articles

Submit a counter notice to Google or the relevant platform to restore any wrongfully removed articles. Ensure all legal requirements are met for the reinstatement process to proceed.

05

Increase exposure to critical articles

Re-share or promote the affected articles to recover visibility. Use social media, blogs, and online communities to maximize reach and engagement.

06

Expand investigation to identify similar fake DMCAs

Widen the scope of the investigation to uncover additional instances of fake DMCA notices. Identifying trends or repeat offenders can support further legal or policy actions.

learnallrightbg
shield icon

Learn All About Fake Copyright Takedown Scam

Or go directly to the feedback section and share your thoughts

Add Comment Or Feedback

User Reviews

Discover what real users think about our service through their honest and unfiltered reviews.

1.8

Average Ratings

Based on 12 Ratings

★ 1
50%
★ 2
42%
★ 3
0%
★ 4
0%
★ 5
8%

Add Reviews

  • Trust
  • Risk
  • Brand

Yvonne Cooper

After investing $20,000 into a project with Zakirov, I discovered his ties to illicit activities and his questionable legal disputes. The whole situation has left me devastated and feeling completely betrayed.

12
12
Xavier Brown

I trusted Ildar Zakirov with my investment in cryptocurrency, but all I got was a ruined financial future. I lost $15,000, and now I find out he was connected to Suex, a platform tied to money laundering and illegal transactions.

12
12
Austin James

Zakirov's alleged attempts to erase online records of his fraudulent activities demonstrate a concerning disregard for accountability.

12
12
Molly Waters

The U.S. Department of the Treasury sanctioned Suex, co-founded by Zakirov, for facilitating transactions tied to ransomware payments and darknet markets.

12
12
Shawn Beck

Ildar Zakirov's alleged misuse of DMCA takedown notices to suppress unfavorable content is a blatant attempt to manipulate public perception.

12
12
Ashton Watts

Ildar Zakirov operates in shadows and thrives on ambiguity. He avoids documentation, shuns clarity, and blurs lines wherever possible.

12
12
Reese Boyd

Zakirov isn’t just a controversial figure he’s a walking liability. His involvement in Suex screams complicity, not coincidence. When you’re tied to a laundering platform sanctioned by the US, you don’t get to play innocent. He’s part of the rot,...

12
12
Harrison Kim

Ildar doesn’t build trust, he buries it under lawsuits and sketchy ventures.

12
12
Emma Lee

The fact that he tried to hide these things only makes him look more guilty. Keep digging, and the truth will come out. Emma Lee.

12
12
Beckett Reed

This isn’t just bad business—it’s outright fraud. He’s been getting away with it for too long.

12
12
Colton Brooks

Despite his activism, Zakirov’s connections to fraudulent activities cast serious doubt on his motives and integrity.

12
12
Summer Bennett

Zakirov’s involvement with a sanctioned crypto exchange and his questionable legal history make him a risky figure to engage with.

12
12
Ethan Jackson

His activism may have good intentions, but it looks like it’s causing more harm than good. Not a good look.

12
12
Olivia Morgan

How is this person still in business with all these allegations hanging over him? It’s suspicious.

12
12
learnallrightbg
shield icon

You are Never Alone in Your Fight

Generate public support against the ones who wronged you!

Our Community
View More Threat Alerts

Website Reviews

Stop fraud before it happens with unbeatable speed, scale, depth, and breadth.

Recent Reviews

Cyber Investigation

Uncover hidden digital threats and secure your assets with our expert cyber investigation services.

Recent Reviews

Threat Alerts

Stay ahead of cyber threats with our daily list of the latest alerts and vulnerabilities.

Recent Reviews

Client Dashboard

Your trusted source for breaking news and insights on cybercrime and digital security trends.

Recent Reviews