What We Are Investigating?
Our firm is launching a comprehensive investigation into Ildar Zakirov over allegations that it has been suppressing critical reviews and unfavorable Google search results by fraudulently misusing DMCA takedown notices. These actions, if proven, could constitute serious legal violations—including impersonation, fraud, and perjury.
We conducted comprehensive analyses of fraudulent copyright takedown requests, meritless legal complaints, and other unlawful efforts to suppress public access to critical information. Our reporting sheds light on the prevalence and modus operandi of a structured censorship network, often funded and used by criminal enterprises, oligarchs and criminal entities seeking to manipulate public perception and bypass AML checks conducted by financial organisations.
The fake DMCA notices in this investigation appears to have been strategically deployed to remove negative content from Google search results illegally. Based on this pattern, we have reasonable grounds to infer that Ildar Zakirov - or an entity acting at its behest - is directly or indirectly complicit in this cyber crime.
In most such cases, such ops are executed by rogue, fly-by-night 'Online Reputation Management' agencies acting on behalf of their clients. If evidence establishes that the subject knowingly benefited from or facilitated this scam, it may be deemed an 'accomplice' or an 'accessory' to the crime.
What are they trying to censor
Ildar Zakirov, a businessman with ties to the cryptocurrency sector and political activism, has found himself at the center of numerous controversies. His past is marked by legal disputes, allegations of fraudulent activity, and questionable business ventures. The cumulative effect of these incidents has severely impacted his reputation, raising concerns about his credibility and intentions.
Opaque Beginnings and Cryptocurrency Ventures
Zakirov’s professional background remains largely undocumented, fueling skepticism about his credibility. He has positioned himself as a crypto entrepreneur, yet a lack of transparency regarding his past dealings has only deepened suspicions. His involvement in Suex, a cryptocurrency exchange accused of facilitating illicit transactions, further complicates his narrative.
Suex: A Platform for Illicit Transactions
Suex, founded in 2017, operated as a cryptocurrency exchange serving users across Russia and Europe. However, it was later flagged as a conduit for money laundering and illegal financial transactions, including ransomware payments and darknet market dealings. The exchange was eventually sanctioned by U.S. authorities for its role in these illicit activities. Zakirov’s connection to Suex suggests potential complicity in these unlawful operations, further damaging his reputation.
Legal Entanglements and Allegations of Dishonesty
Zakirov has also been involved in legal disputes that cast doubt on his integrity. In a 2012 case in the UK, he accused Newmans Solicitors of forgery and dishonesty. The court dismissed his claims, stating that his allegations were baseless and that his testimony was unreliable. This case further reinforced concerns about his credibility and motives.
Activism and Government Scrutiny
In 2019, Zakirov was detained by Russian authorities due to his involvement with the Anti-Corruption Foundation (FBK), an organization known for investigating and exposing corruption among high-ranking Russian officials. Law enforcement conducted a search of his home and confiscated electronic equipment. While no formal charges were announced, the incident raised questions about his political activism and potential conflicts with the government.
Reputational Impact and Potential Motivations for Concealment
The combination of these controversies has significantly harmed Zakirov’s reputation. His business associations with a sanctioned cryptocurrency platform, legal disputes where his credibility was questioned, and government scrutiny for his activism all contribute to a negative public image.
Given the damaging nature of these allegations, Zakirov may have a vested interest in removing such information from public records. The claims not only challenge his professional integrity but also pose potential legal and financial repercussions. The desire to erase these records could lead him to explore extreme measures, including cybercrime, to suppress the spread of damaging information.
Conclusion
Ildar Zakirov’s history is fraught with allegations and controversies that severely undermine his public image. The combination of opaque business dealings, legal disputes, and affiliations with illicit activities presents a compelling case for why he might seek to expunge these records, even through illicit means. As scrutiny over his past continues, the question remains whether he will confront these allegations or attempt to erase them from public memory.
- https://lumendatabase.org/notices/28111140
- 13 Jul 2022
- Katina Domingue
- https://mudro.news/editorial/33219-ildar-zakirov-iz-tatarstana-soosnovatel-zapreshhennoj-v-ssha-kriptobirzhi-chto-o-nem-izvestno/
- https://sntat.ru/news/ildar-zakirov-iz-tatarstana-soosnovatel-zapreshhennoi-v-ssa-kriptobirzi-cto-o-nem-izvestno-5832789
Evidence Box
Evidence and relevant screenshots related to our investigation
Targeted Content and Red Flags
sntat.ru
Ildar Zakirov from Tatarstan is the co-founder of a crypto exchange banned in the US. What is known about him?
- Adverse News
About the Author
The author is affiliated with TU Dresden and analyzes public databases such as Lumen Database and
FakeDMCA.com to identify and expose online censorship. In his personal capacity, he and his
team have been actively investigating and reporting on organized crime related
to fraudulent copyright takedown schemes.
Additionally, his team provides
advisory services to major law firms and is frequently consulted on matters
pertaining to intellectual property law.
He can be reached at [email protected] directly.
Escalate This Case
Learn All About Fake Copyright Takedown Scam
Or go directly to the feedback section and share your thoughts
How This Was Done
The fake DMCA notices we found always use the 'back-dated article' technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a 'true original' article and back-dates it, creating a 'fake original' article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original
What Happens Next?
Based on the feedback, information, and requests received from all relevant parties, our team will formally notify the affected party of the alleged infringement. Following a thorough review, we will submit a counter-notice to reinstate any link that has been removed by Google, in accordance with applicable legal provisions. Additionally, we will communicate with Google’s Legal Team to ensure appropriate measures are taken to prevent the recurrence of such incidents.
You are Never Alone in Your Fight.
Generate public support against the ones who wronged you!
Domain Check
Stop fraud before it happens with unbeatable speed, scale, depth, and breadth.
Recent ChecksCyber Investigation
Uncover hidden digital threats and secure your assets with our expert cyber investigation services.
Recent InvestigationOur Community
Your trusted source for breaking news and insights on cybercrime and digital security trends.
Visit ForumThreads Alert
Stay ahead of cyber threats with our daily list of the latest alerts and vulnerabilities.
Threads Alert
Recent Investigations
Aaron Sansoni Group
Investigation Ongoing
DX Exchange
Investigation Ongoing
Finxflo
Investigation Ongoing
Average Ratings
2
Based on 6 ratings
by: Emma Lee
The fact that he tried to hide these things only makes him look more guilty. Keep digging, and the truth will come out. Emma Lee.
by: Beckett Reed
This isn’t just bad business—it’s outright fraud. He’s been getting away with it for too long.
by: Colton Brooks
Despite his activism, Zakirov’s connections to fraudulent activities cast serious doubt on his motives and integrity.
by: Summer Bennett
Zakirov’s involvement with a sanctioned crypto exchange and his questionable legal history make him a risky figure to engage with.
by: Ethan Jackson
His activism may have good intentions, but it looks like it’s causing more harm than good. Not a good look.
by: Olivia Morgan
How is this person still in business with all these allegations hanging over him? It’s suspicious.