Profile Picture

IQ Option

  • Investigation status
  • Ongoing

We are investigating IQ Option for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices. This includes potential violations such as impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

  • Company
  • IQ Option

  • City
  • Agios Athanasios

  • Country
  • Cyprus

  • Allegations
  • Scam

IQ Option
Fake DMCA notices
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/44122876
  • Aug 27, 2024
  • NovaFusion Dynamics
  • https://iqoption.com/en
  • https://www.earnforex.com/forex-brokers/IQOption/

Evidence Box and Screenshots

1 Alerts on IQ Option

IQ Option, established in 2013, has encountered significant regulatory scrutiny across multiple jurisdictions. In 2016, the Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission (CySEC) fined the company €180,000 for various violations, including misleading marketing materials and inadequate approval of liquidity providers. Although this fine was later reduced to €20,000 after the company provided additional documentation, it raised concerns about the firm’s compliance practices. In 2019, IQ Option agreed to a €450,000 settlement with CySEC for failing to implement effective safeguards against conflicts of interest and for insecure transaction processes.

In Australia, IQ Option operated without a license until 2016, addressing regulatory shortcomings only after receiving a formal warning from the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC). Similarly, in Singapore, the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) placed IQ Option on its Investor Alert List in July 2017, signaling potential risks to investors.

Allegations of Fraudulent Practices

Beyond regulatory fines, IQ Option has faced allegations of fraudulent activities. In India, the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) included IQ Option in its alert list as of June 2017, warning residents that conducting forex transactions with the company could lead to legal actions under the Foreign Exchange Management Act (FEMA), 1999. In 2021, a class-action lawsuit was filed against IQ Option in India, alleging fraud through a cryptocurrency investment scheme. Victims claimed that the company promised returns of up to 900% but blocked withdrawals under the guise of technical errors. The lawsuit seeks a permanent ban on the company’s operations in India.

In Indonesia, binary options, including those offered by IQ Option, are classified as a form of online gambling. Since February 2022, the company has been banned along with over 92 similar operators, further limiting its ability to operate in Southeast Asia.

User Complaints and Platform Integrity

Users have reported significant issues with IQ Option’s platform integrity. Some traders have accused the company of manipulating trading graphs to turn profitable trades into losses. For instance, a user practicing on a demo account reported consistent profits, but upon switching to a real account, experienced losses that seemed orchestrated by the platform. Additionally, there have been reports of delayed or blocked withdrawals, with customer support being unresponsive to user complaints.

Reputational Impact and Potential Motivations for Content Removal

The accumulation of regulatory fines, legal challenges, and user complaints has significantly tarnished IQ Option’s reputation. Allegations of fraudulent practices and regulatory non-compliance can erode public trust, deter potential clients, and attract further regulatory scrutiny. In an effort to protect its reputation and maintain its client base, IQ Option might be motivated to seek the removal of these unfavorable stories. While the company would ideally pursue legal and ethical avenues for content removal, the persistence of adverse news could, in a hypothetical scenario, tempt an entity to consider illicit methods, such as cybercrime, to suppress negative coverage.

How Was This Done?

The fake DMCA notices we found always use the ? back-dated article? technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a ? true original? article and back-dates it, creating a ? fake original? article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original.

What Happens Next?

The fake DMCA notices we found always use the ? back-dated article? technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a ? true original? article and back-dates it, creating a ? fake original? article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original.

01

Inform Google about the fake DMCA scam

Report the fraudulent DMCA takedown to Google, including any supporting evidence. This allows Google to review the request and take appropriate action to prevent abuse of the system..

02

Share findings with journalists and media

Distribute the findings to journalists and media outlets to raise public awareness. Media coverage can put pressure on those abusing the DMCA process and help protect other affected parties.

03

Inform Lumen Database

Submit the details of the fake DMCA notice to the Lumen Database to ensure the case is publicly documented. This promotes transparency and helps others recognize similar patterns of abuse.

04

File counter notice to reinstate articles

Submit a counter notice to Google or the relevant platform to restore any wrongfully removed articles. Ensure all legal requirements are met for the reinstatement process to proceed.

05

Increase exposure to critical articles

Re-share or promote the affected articles to recover visibility. Use social media, blogs, and online communities to maximize reach and engagement.

06

Expand investigation to identify similar fake DMCAs

Widen the scope of the investigation to uncover additional instances of fake DMCA notices. Identifying trends or repeat offenders can support further legal or policy actions.

learnallrightbg
shield icon

Learn All About Fake Copyright Takedown Scam

Or go directly to the feedback section and share your thoughts

Add Comment Or Feedback

User Reviews

Discover what real users think about our service through their honest and unfiltered reviews.

2.1

Average Ratings

Based on 6 Ratings

★ 1
0%
★ 2
83%
★ 3
17%
★ 4
0%
★ 5
0%

Add Reviews

  • Trust
  • Risk
  • Brand

Quinn Hughes

After trusting IQ Option with $7,800 for crypto trading, they froze my account and support vanished this feels like outright theft

12
12
Penny Moore

I lost $6,200 with IQ Option after they blocked my withdrawals and blamed it on a 'technical glitch' they took everything and gave nothing back

12
12
Kojo Mensah

Practicing on a demo account and winning, only to lose everything on a real account? That’s not trading, it’s bait and switch 101.

12
12
Anaïs Laurent

When a trading platform gets slapped with fines on three continents, it's not an outlier—it’s a pattern.

12
12
Devin Wilkins

Legal issues in India, bans in Southeast Asia, and a flood of complaints—it’s almost impressive how deep their problems go. Any company that needs this much damage control has no business handling your money. Their reputation isn't flawed it’s broken.

12
12
Bella Marsh

Track record is a regulatory nightmare. From fines in Cyprus to bans in Indonesia, their global footprint looks more like a cautionary tale than a success story.

12
12
Cody Gibbs

IQ Option isn’t a trading platform, it’s a regulatory disaster dressed in a sleek UI

12
12
Liam Walker

Avoid this scam broker at all costs. While losses are tolerable, they block your account when you make profits, without providing any specific reason. Protect your hard-earned money by staying far away from this platform.

12
12
Kathy Clark

IQ Option is a complete fraud. They take money through UPI under different names, and even after months, withdrawals remain "in process"—I've been waiting for my Rs. 30,000 withdrawal.

12
12
Jack Harris

I am extremely frustrated with IQ OPTION as they are refusing to process my withdrawal, despite all deadlines having passed. My account is currently undergoing an "additional check," which is not mentioned anywhere in the rules or terms of service....

12
12
Ivy Moore

This company is nothing short of fraudulent. They engage in price manipulation, block accounts without valid reason, and delay withdrawals for an unreasonable amount of time. Additionally, their marketing tactics are deceptive, using fake accounts to mislead potential customers. Their...

12
12
learnallrightbg
shield icon

You are Never Alone in Your Fight

Generate public support against the ones who wronged you!

Our Community
View More Threat Alerts

Website Reviews

Stop fraud before it happens with unbeatable speed, scale, depth, and breadth.

Recent Reviews

Cyber Investigation

Uncover hidden digital threats and secure your assets with our expert cyber investigation services.

Recent Reviews

Threat Alerts

Stay ahead of cyber threats with our daily list of the latest alerts and vulnerabilities.

Recent Reviews

Client Dashboard

Your trusted source for breaking news and insights on cybercrime and digital security trends.

Recent Reviews