What We Are Investigating?
Our firm is launching a comprehensive investigation into Kalpesh Patel over allegations that it has been suppressing critical reviews and unfavorable Google search results by fraudulently misusing DMCA takedown notices. These actions, if proven, could constitute serious legal violations—including impersonation, fraud, and perjury.
We conducted comprehensive analyses of fraudulent copyright takedown requests, meritless legal complaints, and other unlawful efforts to suppress public access to critical information. Our reporting sheds light on the prevalence and modus operandi of a structured censorship network, often funded and used by criminal enterprises, oligarchs and criminal entities seeking to manipulate public perception and bypass AML checks conducted by financial organisations.
The fake DMCA notices in this investigation appears to have been strategically deployed to remove negative content from Google search results illegally. Based on this pattern, we have reasonable grounds to infer that Kalpesh Patel - or an entity acting at its behest - is directly or indirectly complicit in this cyber crime.
In most such cases, such ops are executed by rogue, fly-by-night 'Online Reputation Management' agencies acting on behalf of their clients. If evidence establishes that the subject knowingly benefited from or facilitated this scam, it may be deemed an 'accomplice' or an 'accessory' to the crime.
What are they trying to censor
Kalpesh Patel has become a figure shrouded in controversy, with a trail of allegations, red flags, and adverse news that paint a deeply troubling portrait of his activities. Drawing from legal documents, government press releases, and consumer complaints, the following summary exposes the extent of the allegations against him and the damage they inflict on his reputation. These reports suggest a pattern of deceit and misconduct, raising questions about his motives and methods, including the potential for cybercrime to silence his critics.
Major Allegations and Red Flags:
- Involvement in Fraud Schemes:
A U.S. Department of Justice press release (source) details a fraud scheme involving a Chicago man who acted as a money courier for a larger criminal operation. While Patel is not explicitly named in this case, his alleged association with similar schemes has raised serious concerns. The case highlights a network of financial fraud, money laundering, and deception—activities that, if linked to Patel, would severely damage his credibility and portray him as a willing participant in illegal enterprises. - Legal Disputes and Ethical Violations:
A legal document from Selborne Chambers (source) reveals a case where Patel was accused of misrepresentation and breach of contract. The allegations suggest that Patel failed to fulfill his obligations, leading to significant financial losses for the other party. This type of legal dispute paints him as unreliable and unethical, further eroding trust in his professional conduct. Such accusations are particularly damaging in business circles, where reputation is paramount. - Consumer Scam Allegations:
ComplaintsBoard (source) features numerous consumer complaints accusing Patel of running fraudulent investment schemes. Victims claim they were lured with promises of high returns, only to lose their money. These allegations portray Patel as a scam artist who preys on unsuspecting individuals, exploiting their trust for personal gain. The public nature of these complaints amplifies their impact, making them easily accessible to anyone researching Patel’s background.
Impact on Reputation:
The allegations against Patel—ranging from fraud and legal disputes to consumer scams—create a damning narrative of dishonesty and exploitation. For someone whose professional success depends on trust and credibility, these stories are catastrophic. They depict Patel as a figure willing to engage in unethical and illegal activities, which can lead to lost business opportunities, legal consequences, and social isolation. The cumulative effect of these allegations is a reputation in tatters, with little room for redemption.
Why Patel Might Seek to Remove These Stories:
The motivation to suppress or remove these stories is glaringly obvious: they are a direct threat to Patel’s ability to operate in any legitimate capacity. Negative media coverage, legal disputes, and public complaints can deter potential investors, partners, and clients, effectively crippling his career. For someone facing such allegations, the temptation to resort to cybercrime—such as hacking into websites to delete damaging content or launching disinformation campaigns—might seem like a desperate but necessary solution. By erasing or discrediting these stories, Patel could attempt to salvage what remains of his reputation and avoid further scrutiny.
- https://lumendatabase.org/notices/45392167
- October 14, 2024
- Kristina Spremo
- https://www.tumblr.com/pyramidscheme-scam/764307237608062976/thekalpeshpatelcom-review-scam
- https://www.complaintsboard.com/thekalpeshpatelcom-scam-c218356
Evidence Box
Evidence and relevant screenshots related to our investigation
Targeted Content and Red Flags
United State Attorney's Office
Chicago Man Sentenced to 32 Months for Acting as Money Courier in Fraud Scheme
- Adverse News
About the Author
The author is affiliated with TU Dresden and analyzes public databases such as Lumen Database and
FakeDMCA.com to identify and expose online censorship. In his personal capacity, he and his
team have been actively investigating and reporting on organized crime related
to fraudulent copyright takedown schemes.
Additionally, his team provides
advisory services to major law firms and is frequently consulted on matters
pertaining to intellectual property law.
He can be reached at [email protected] directly.
Escalate This Case
Learn All About Fake Copyright Takedown Scam
Or go directly to the feedback section and share your thoughts
How This Was Done
The fake DMCA notices we found always use the 'back-dated article' technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a 'true original' article and back-dates it, creating a 'fake original' article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original
What Happens Next?
Based on the feedback, information, and requests received from all relevant parties, our team will formally notify the affected party of the alleged infringement. Following a thorough review, we will submit a counter-notice to reinstate any link that has been removed by Google, in accordance with applicable legal provisions. Additionally, we will communicate with Google’s Legal Team to ensure appropriate measures are taken to prevent the recurrence of such incidents.
You are Never Alone in Your Fight.
Generate public support against the ones who wronged you!
Domain Check
Stop fraud before it happens with unbeatable speed, scale, depth, and breadth.
Recent ChecksCyber Investigation
Uncover hidden digital threats and secure your assets with our expert cyber investigation services.
Recent InvestigationOur Community
Your trusted source for breaking news and insights on cybercrime and digital security trends.
Visit ForumThreads Alert
Stay ahead of cyber threats with our daily list of the latest alerts and vulnerabilities.
Threads Alert
Recent Investigations
Aaron Sansoni Group
Investigation Ongoing
DX Exchange
Investigation Ongoing
Finxflo
Investigation Ongoing
Average Ratings
2
Based on 3 ratings
by: Mason Clark
Dude’s out here playin financial guru while peopl losing their savings. Straight up evil. Hope karma hits soon fr 😤
by: Olivia Adams
Legal disputes, fraud, scams this guy’s name is linked to every shady trick in the book. It’s honestly disturbing how people like this manage to operate for so long before getting caught. Investors and customers beware! stay awayyyyy
by: Harper Evans
Bro got lawsuits, fraud claims, scam reports, cybercrime accusations he the full package of RUN. 🚨