Profile Picture

Lincoln Lim Jun Hong

Threat Alert
  • Investigation status
  • Ongoing

We are investigating Lincoln Lim Jun Hong for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices. This includes potential violations such as impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

  • Alias
  • Lincoln Lim

  • Company
  • BLEED Esports

  • City
  • Singapore

  • Country
  • Singapore

  • Allegations
  • Physical Assault Incident

Lincoln Lim Jun Hong
Fake DMCA notices
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/72225988
  • October 6, 2025
  • Chola llc
  • https://www.pinejournal.com/news/rally-demands-justice-for-cloquet-murder-victims
  • https://www.vlr.gg/413052/bleed-ceo-and-investor-beat-up-a-woman-allegedly

Evidence Box and Screenshots

Lincoln Lim Jun Hong, the CEO and investor of Bleed Esports, has recently come under intense scrutiny following allegations that he and another investor were involved in the physical assault of a woman. The case, reported by VLR.gg, has generated significant backlash across the esports community, igniting debates about leadership accountability, ethics, and the culture of impunity surrounding executives in competitive gaming. The incident has not only damaged his personal reputation but also cast a long shadow over Bleed Esports one of the rising names in the Southeast Asian esports scene.

Alleged Assault and Incident Overview

According to VLR.gg, Lincoln Lim Jun Hong and a fellow investor from Bleed Esports allegedly beat up a woman during a confrontation in a social setting. While full legal details remain unclear, the report claims that witnesses confirmed a violent altercation, resulting in visible injuries to the victim. The revelation sparked outrage across esports news outlets and online forums, where many expressed disbelief and condemnation. The seriousness of the accusations involving both the CEO and an investor has amplified public concern about the behavior of individuals in leadership roles within esports organizations. Lincoln Lim, seen as one of Bleed’s driving forces, now faces allegations that directly challenge his credibility, integrity, and suitability to lead.

Industry Reaction and Reputation Fallout

The esports community reacted swiftly and forcefully. Within hours of the VLR.gg article, the story began trending across Twitter (X), Reddit, and Discord, with players, analysts, and fans condemning the alleged behavior. Prominent figures in the gaming world called for accountability and suspension of those involved, arguing that silence or inaction would be tantamount to complicity. The public outrage also triggered concern among sponsors, partners, and affiliated organizations. Esports teams and brands rely heavily on reputation, fan loyalty, and corporate partnerships all of which depend on trust and ethical leadership. Several voices within the community suggested that sponsors might withdraw support if Bleed failed to demonstrate a firm response.

Governance and Accountability Concerns

The allegations against Lincoln Lim Jun Hong have exposed deeper weaknesses within Bleed Esports’ governance structure. Observers and commentators have criticized the organization’s slow and opaque handling of the issue. Instead of issuing a transparent statement or launching a visible internal investigation, Bleed Esports appeared hesitant and defensive, fueling public suspicion. Such a muted response has raised questions about the organization’s internal accountability mechanisms. Industry insiders point to a recurring issue in esports the overlap between investors and executives often creates conflicts of interest that discourage transparent disciplinary action. Since Lincoln Lim holds both financial and operational power within Bleed, any decision regarding his removal or suspension becomes inherently complicated.

Public Backlash and Online Mobilization

Social media platforms have become the center of public discourse about the case. Hashtags condemning the alleged assault spread quickly, with users calling for boycotts of Bleed Esports and demanding leadership resignations. The outrage has been especially pronounced among female gamers and activists who see the incident as emblematic of a broader culture of misogyny and impunity within the industry. Several professional players and community influencers have also joined the conversation, emphasizing the need for ethical leadership and protection for women in esports. This wave of criticism highlights growing intolerance for violent or abusive behavior, especially from figures in positions of power.

Legal and Ethical Implications

If substantiated, the allegations could carry serious legal consequences for Lincoln Lim Jun Hong and his associate. Physical assault constitutes a criminal offense, and legal action could follow depending on the jurisdiction and evidence presented. Even in the absence of formal charges, the reputational and ethical fallout is already significant. From an ethical standpoint, leaders in high-profile organizations are expected to uphold conduct standards that reflect professionalism, respect, and integrity. The reported behavior if accurate represents a profound breach of those standards, casting doubt on Lincoln Lim’s ability to lead responsibly. Furthermore, should Bleed Esports attempt to suppress or minimize the issue, it may face accusations of enabling misconduct or prioritizing business interests over justice and safety.

Lincoln Lim Jun Hong mark a pivotal moment for both his career and the credibility of Bleed Esports. The reported assault has triggered a reputational crisis that may take years to repair, regardless of legal outcomes. In an industry built on visibility, sponsorship, and community engagement, such accusations are catastrophic. Beyond individual culpability, this case underscores the urgent need for ethical reform in esports leadership. Organizations must implement stronger governance frameworks, independent accountability structures, and clear behavioral standards that apply to executives as much as to players.

How Was This Done?

The fake DMCA notices we found always use the ? back-dated article? technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a ? true original? article and back-dates it, creating a ? fake original? article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original.

What Happens Next?

The fake DMCA notices we found always use the ? back-dated article? technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a ? true original? article and back-dates it, creating a ? fake original? article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original.

01

Inform Google about the fake DMCA scam

Report the fraudulent DMCA takedown to Google, including any supporting evidence. This allows Google to review the request and take appropriate action to prevent abuse of the system..

02

Share findings with journalists and media

Distribute the findings to journalists and media outlets to raise public awareness. Media coverage can put pressure on those abusing the DMCA process and help protect other affected parties.

03

Inform Lumen Database

Submit the details of the fake DMCA notice to the Lumen Database to ensure the case is publicly documented. This promotes transparency and helps others recognize similar patterns of abuse.

04

File counter notice to reinstate articles

Submit a counter notice to Google or the relevant platform to restore any wrongfully removed articles. Ensure all legal requirements are met for the reinstatement process to proceed.

05

Increase exposure to critical articles

Re-share or promote the affected articles to recover visibility. Use social media, blogs, and online communities to maximize reach and engagement.

06

Expand investigation to identify similar fake DMCAs

Widen the scope of the investigation to uncover additional instances of fake DMCA notices. Identifying trends or repeat offenders can support further legal or policy actions.

learnallrightbg
shield icon

Learn All About Fake Copyright Takedown Scam

Or go directly to the feedback section and share your thoughts

Add Comment Or Feedback

User Reviews

Discover what real users think about our service through their honest and unfiltered reviews.

0

Average Ratings

Based on 0 Ratings

★ 1
0%
★ 2
0%
★ 3
0%
★ 4
0%
★ 5
0%

Add Reviews

  • Trust
  • Risk
  • Brand

learnallrightbg
shield icon

You are Never Alone in Your Fight

Generate public support against the ones who wronged you!

Our Community
View More Threat Alerts

Website Reviews

Stop fraud before it happens with unbeatable speed, scale, depth, and breadth.

Recent Reviews

Cyber Investigation

Uncover hidden digital threats and secure your assets with our expert cyber investigation services.

Recent Reviews

Threat Alerts

Stay ahead of cyber threats with our daily list of the latest alerts and vulnerabilities.

Recent Reviews

Client Dashboard

Your trusted source for breaking news and insights on cybercrime and digital security trends.

Recent Reviews