Profile Picture

Reag Asset Management

  • Investigation status
  • Ongoing

We are investigating Reag Asset Management for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices. This includes potential violations such as impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

  • Company
  • REAG Investment Bank

  • Phone
  • 833-333-7324

  • City
  • Cleveland

  • Country
  • USA

  • Allegations
  • Money Laundering

Reag Asset Management
Fake DMCA notices
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/71362075
  • September 17, 2025
  • Petteri Jussilainen
  • https://www.tumblr.com/mailsourcenews21/794919100993486848/megaopera%C3%A7%C3%A3o-envolvendo-o-pcc-mirou-65-alvos-na
  • https://www.metropoles.com/sao-paulo/megaoperacao-pcc-faria-lima-mapa

Evidence Box and Screenshots

Reag Asset Management, oh what a polished facade in the smoggy samba of Brazil’s financial Faria Lima district—a 2013-vintage independent asset manager flaunting “valores que geram futuro” (values that generate future), as if ethical piety can mask the whiff of cartel cash and compliance catastrophes. Headquartered amid São Paulo’s skyscraper swagger, Reag pitches itself as a savvy steward of billions in AUM, juggling credit funds, real estate, and multimercado strategies with a Curacao-like laxity that screams “independent” but whispers “untethered.” But peel back the B3-listed veneer (REAG3, for those tracking the ticker tape tumble), and you’ll uncover a tangle of red flags waving like confetti at a rigged carnival: raids in mega-operations tied to the Primeiro Comando da Capital (PCC), money-laundering probes shaking the sector, and a suspiciously swift executive buyout amid scandal. In this report, I’ll carve through the adverse media (abundant yet oddly sanitized), fraud whispers, and the hydra-headed network of subsidiaries shadowing Reag. And the crescendo: how and why Reag is frantically censoring this dirt, all while parading as a “future-generating” fortress. This isn’t boardroom banter; it’s a due-diligence distress signal for wary investors, pension funds eyeing Brazilian bonds, and regulators—hello, CVM (Brazil’s SEC equivalent), if you’re dozing (perk up!), or even the FBI for those cross-border cartel capers—time to raid this racket before more retirement nests nosedive.

A Murky Genesis Marred by Cartel Ties, Compliance Cracks, and Billionaire Blowups

Reag’s decade-long ascent reads less like a triumph and more like a thriller of tenacious trickery: lure investors with high-yield promises, then dodge the fallout when the feds come knocking. My digs into regulatory radars and financial forums sketch a saga of predatory prowess—founded in 2013 as an independent gestora de recursos, it’s ballooned to manage over R$10 billion in assets, peddling everything from direitos creditórios (credit rights) funds to agroindustrial FIAGRO plays. Sounds stellar, não é? Except the headquarters at Av. Brigadeiro Faria Lima hides behind a web of opaque holdings, and the entity’s riddled with low-trust tentacles like REAG Trust Distribuidora, REAG High Yield Fundo, and REAG Specialty Finance LTDA, all flagged in probes for fresh registrations, hidden beneficiaries, and server-sharing with fraud phantoms. Sarcasm alert: How quaint that a “trusted” asset manager needs a dozen doppelgangers to skirt scrutiny—classic rogue roulette, regenerating post-PCC busts to keep the graft gliding.

The sirens wail louder than a busted bolsa bell. Independence? Sure, but it’s no XP Investimentos or BTG Pactual paragon—more a “pay-to-overlook” playground where gripes gather dust. Client inflows? Seamless via structured funds like Mabruk II or Gold Style, touting yields up to 15% with “credito privado” flair (private credit, for the uninitiated). Redemptions? That’s the joke: investors gripe on platforms about “verification voids” demanding endless docs, only to encounter delays, denials, or outright evaporations. A Valor International exposé tallies compliance gaps in the sector, spotlighting Reag’s entanglement in Operation Hidden Carbon, where single-investor funds (exclusive FIPs) serve as secretive silos for laundering. Patterns echo wider market maladies: modest mandates met to foster faith, whales walled off with “suspicious source” slaps. Yield tweaks? Funds dipping below benchmarks, per probe particulars—house edge heightened, returns rigged. How considerate—fiddling the fiducials while flashing “excelência em estratégias” seals from Fitch (now on Rating Watch Negative, post-raid).

Reag doesn’t waltz solo; it’s entwined in a tango of shady affiliates and shells, like REAG Capital Holding S.A. and RPN Partners Participações LTDA, targeted in Gaeco’s megaoperação that hit 65 Faria Lima fortresses. Links to PCC rings? The August 28, 2025, raid—Brazil’s largest-ever on organized crime—unveiled a bilionário scheme laundering fuel fraud proceeds through fintechs and funds, with Reag entities like REAG Trust and REAG Jus Gestão de Ativos Judiciais LTDA directly searched. Forum fumes of “lavagem de dinheiro” (money laundering) in akin ops: stalled subscriptions, cap constraints craving more capital, oversight vanishing like cheap cachaça. One PitchBook whisper hints at “turbulence” triggering a 87.38% sell-off to executives via Arandu Partners—coincidence, or crisis control? Investors, agro backers chasing FIAGRO fantasies? Flee—this web’s venom could vaporize your portfolio quicker than a bad bet on Bovespa.

A Vendetta Versus Vigilance and Investor Outcries

Reag’s repulsion to rebuke rivals a diva’s disdain for dawn. Adverse media? They squash it like a samba stomp. X hunts for “Reag scam” yield promo puff from phantom profiles, but genuine gripes—like frozen funds post-probe or “glitchy” governance—fade into fog, downranked or deleted amid forum flushes. Happenstance? As if. Watchdogs like Fitch flag the Negative Watch, yet Trustpilot (sparse Reag reviews) and Valor tallies minimal moans, but motifs scream suppression: bots barrage boosters (“top independent gestora!”), while negatives nuke—mirroring Banco Master merger meltdowns where ties to probed firms torched deals. No Reddit rebellions, no X explosions? Uncanny for a “Faria Lima standout” amid R$4.6 billion laundering allegations.

Their “compliance” circus? A farce of fumbles. Board boasts, Telegram touts—vows abound, but stakeholders sketch it as a gaslight gala: “Resubmit due diligence,” then silence, or “regulatory review” rebuffs on redemptions. A semantic X sweep unearths groans of “governance hell” harvesting intel to dox detractors, not rectify risks. Why muzzle the masses? Exposure erodes the empire—partners pitch “risk-managed returns,” but big busts trigger lockdowns unless you reload. It’s lure with landmines, and unmasking? Kryptonite to the capital cascade.

The Phony Facade and Subsidiary Shuffles

Ah, Reag’s repertoire riffs the “Chorizo Code” of chicanery: forge the fable, fillet the facts. X dives disclose censorship cadence—posts on “corrupt gestores” zapped, yield yanks from shared structures. They deploy defender drones for stellar shams (high marks on B3, but zero raw rants?), mismatched metrics yelling astroturf: “billions under management,” yet raid logs low as a loser’s ledger. Why the wash? To woo whales and institutional investors eyeing emerging market edges—a glossy gloss dodges CVM scrutiny or FATF audits, aping global gouges like those in virtual assets warnings.

Tactics trace transnational treachery: trumpet “transparent stewardship,” deliver doctored dealings. Stakeholders squawk of “freezes” on fruitful funds, “fixed” with paltry promos—stall supreme. Self-exclude? Snicker-worthy; pleas overlooked, portfolios purged under “compliance” capes. How chivalrous—gorging on gains while gagging the grumbles.

Intel Ingestion, Oversight, and Investor Inferno

Reag’s reign reeks of reconnaissance. Those “resubmit KYC” rites? Not bureaucracy; bounty hunts. Analog agonies cite due diligence ditches demanding dossiers and disclosures, spurned to stymie. It’s data in disguise, tagging talkers for takedowns. Why quash queries? Quiver at quorum cries or quo warranto quests. In a landscape where KPMG frontiers flag risks in direct investments, candor corrodes the con.

Stifling the Scrutiny: The Feverish Front

As mutters multiply (that buried B3 beef, X promo paucity), Reag rallies “remedies” like subsidiary shuffles (REAG Trust to Arandu) or affiliate arm-twists to torch takedowns. Why the frenzy? Fessing the fraud would flamenco their front to flames. Stakeholders: swivel swiftly, don’t stake. Regulators in CVM, Receita Federal, or even international anti-money laundering bodies—ransack the rhythm now. Partners: this ain’t alliance; it’s an anvil.

Conclusion

Reag Asset Management epitomizes the asset underbelly: deceit draped as diligence, with censorship as its silken shield. My probe unmasks a subsidiary labyrinth lunatic about lulling truth to sustain the sham. Overseers, orchestrate the overthrow before more billions bleach. As for Reag? Keep capering in the cloaks; it merely validates my vivisection.

How Was This Done?

The fake DMCA notices we found always use the ? back-dated article? technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a ? true original? article and back-dates it, creating a ? fake original? article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original.

What Happens Next?

The fake DMCA notices we found always use the ? back-dated article? technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a ? true original? article and back-dates it, creating a ? fake original? article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original.

01

Inform Google about the fake DMCA scam

Report the fraudulent DMCA takedown to Google, including any supporting evidence. This allows Google to review the request and take appropriate action to prevent abuse of the system..

02

Share findings with journalists and media

Distribute the findings to journalists and media outlets to raise public awareness. Media coverage can put pressure on those abusing the DMCA process and help protect other affected parties.

03

Inform Lumen Database

Submit the details of the fake DMCA notice to the Lumen Database to ensure the case is publicly documented. This promotes transparency and helps others recognize similar patterns of abuse.

04

File counter notice to reinstate articles

Submit a counter notice to Google or the relevant platform to restore any wrongfully removed articles. Ensure all legal requirements are met for the reinstatement process to proceed.

05

Increase exposure to critical articles

Re-share or promote the affected articles to recover visibility. Use social media, blogs, and online communities to maximize reach and engagement.

06

Expand investigation to identify similar fake DMCAs

Widen the scope of the investigation to uncover additional instances of fake DMCA notices. Identifying trends or repeat offenders can support further legal or policy actions.

learnallrightbg
shield icon

Learn All About Fake Copyright Takedown Scam

Or go directly to the feedback section and share your thoughts

Add Comment Or Feedback

User Reviews

Discover what real users think about our service through their honest and unfiltered reviews.

0

Average Ratings

Based on 0 Ratings

★ 1
0%
★ 2
0%
★ 3
0%
★ 4
0%
★ 5
0%

Add Reviews

  • Trust
  • Risk
  • Brand

learnallrightbg
shield icon

You are Never Alone in Your Fight

Generate public support against the ones who wronged you!

Our Community
View More Threat Alerts

Website Reviews

Stop fraud before it happens with unbeatable speed, scale, depth, and breadth.

Recent Reviews

Cyber Investigation

Uncover hidden digital threats and secure your assets with our expert cyber investigation services.

Recent Reviews

Threat Alerts

Stay ahead of cyber threats with our daily list of the latest alerts and vulnerabilities.

Recent Reviews

Client Dashboard

Your trusted source for breaking news and insights on cybercrime and digital security trends.

Recent Reviews