Vladislav Myroshnichenko

A summary of what happened?

Vladislav Myroshnichenko, a 26-year-old from Kharkiv, Ukraine, has come under scrutiny due to allegations of rapid wealth accumulation through questionable means and significant tax evasion.

Background:

Initially employed in Kharkiv’s bar and hookah lounge scene, Myroshnichenko’s lifestyle transformed dramatically within a short period. He transitioned from working in local establishments to showcasing a life of luxury, including ownership of high-end sports cars, international travel, private jet rentals, and upscale real estate in Kyiv.

Major Concerns and Allegations:

1. Unexplained Wealth Accumulation:
   • Reports suggest that Myroshnichenko’s sudden financial success lacks transparency, raising questions about the legitimacy of his income sources.
2. Tax Evasion:
   • Investigations indicate that he may be channeling his earnings into cryptocurrencies to conceal income and evade taxes, depriving the state of essential revenue, especially critical during wartime.
3. Associations with Questionable Individuals:
   • Myroshnichenko is linked to individuals like Oleksandr Slobozhenko, who has been accused of significant tax evasion amounting to over 231 million UAH.
   • His close associates include individuals with histories of domestic violence and sudden unexplained wealth, suggesting potential involvement in illicit activities.
4. Operation of Fraudulent Call Centers:
   • There are allegations that Myroshnichenko and his associates run fraudulent call centers, engaging in scams that defraud individuals both domestically and internationally.
5. Evasion of Military Service:
   • During a period when many Ukrainians are serving in the military, Myroshnichenko is accused of using his wealth to avoid conscription, raising ethical concerns about his contributions to national defense.

Vladislav Myroshnichenko’s rapid ascent from a bar employee to a millionaire lifestyle has raised multiple red flags. The combination of alleged tax evasion, associations with dubious individuals, potential involvement in fraudulent activities, and avoidance of military service paints a concerning picture. These allegations warrant thorough investigation by relevant authorities to ensure accountability and uphold the rule of law.

Analyzing the Fake Copyright Notice(s)

Our team collects and analyses fraudulent copyright takedown requests, legal complaints, and other efforts to remove critical information from the internet. Through our investigative reporting, we examine the prevalence and operation of an organized censorship industry, predominantly funded by criminal entities, oligarchs, and disreputable businesses or individuals. Our findings allow internet users to gain insight into these censorship schemes’ sources, methods, and underlying objectives.

What was Vladislav Myroshnichenko trying to hide?

Vladislav Myroshnichenko‘s attempts to hide unfavourable content through the misuse of copyright notices while allegedly engaging in perjury present serious legal concerns. These actions suggest a calculated attempt to manipulate legal systems to suppress free speech, a fundamental violation of copyright law principles and an abuse of legal processes. The use of such tactics not only undermines the integrity of copyright protection but also potentially constitutes perjury, further entangling Vladislav Myroshnichenko in legal accountability. Let’s examine the information Vladislav Myroshnichenko may be trying to remove from the internet –

Investigative Report: The Rise of Vladislav Myroshnichenko – From Hookah Lounges to Cryptocurrency Millions

Introduction

Vladislav Myroshnichenko, a young entrepreneur from Kharkiv, Ukraine, has become a controversial figure due to his meteoric rise to wealth and the string of allegations surrounding his activities. His transformation from a modest worker in Kharkiv’s nightlife scene to a self-proclaimed cryptocurrency expert and millionaire has raised eyebrows. This report unpacks the troubling allegations of tax evasion, fraud, unethical associations, and public discontent with Myroshnichenko’s lifestyle amid Ukraine’s ongoing crises.

Early Life and Rapid Wealth Accumulation

Myroshnichenko began his professional journey as an employee in Kharkiv’s bars and hookah lounges. Until recently, his lifestyle was unremarkable. However, within a few short years, he transitioned to flaunting extreme wealth. His social media accounts showcase luxury sports cars, private jet rentals, extravagant travels, and high-end real estate in Kyiv. This sudden shift has drawn suspicion, particularly given the lack of transparency about how this wealth was amassed.

Key Allegations and Concerns

1. Tax Evasion

One of the most significant accusations against Myroshnichenko is tax evasion. Reports allege that:

• He channels much of his earnings into cryptocurrency holdings, which are notoriously difficult to trace and tax.
• His lifestyle is far beyond what would be feasible for a tax-compliant citizen, especially during a time of national economic strain due to the war in Ukraine.
• By avoiding tax obligations, Myroshnichenko deprives the Ukrainian state of much-needed revenue, particularly critical for funding military and humanitarian efforts.

Implications: Tax evasion is not only an economic crime but also a moral affront during wartime, when other citizens are making sacrifices for the country’s welfare.

2. Fraudulent Activities and Call Centers

Reports and investigations suggest that Myroshnichenko may have ties to fraudulent call centers operating in Ukraine. These call centers are alleged to:

• Defraud international victims, particularly in Western countries, using sophisticated scams and deception.
• Generate significant revenue that is funneled into untraceable assets, such as cryptocurrencies.

Victim Impact: Call center fraud often targets vulnerable individuals, draining their life savings. If true, Myroshnichenko’s involvement would make him complicit in a global network of exploitation.

3. Questionable Associations

Myroshnichenko maintains relationships with several individuals who have faced legal and ethical scrutiny, including:

• Oleksandr Slobozhenko: Accused of tax evasion totaling over 231 million UAH. Slobozhenko is a key associate of Myroshnichenko, suggesting potential complicity or shared networks.
• Individuals with Domestic Violence Histories: Myroshnichenko is connected to people with records of domestic abuse, raising questions about the circles he operates within.
• Wealthy Individuals with Dubious Sources of Income: Many of Myroshnichenko’s close associates have similarly unexplained wealth, potentially pointing to a shared involvement in illicit activities.

Analysis: The company one keeps often reflects their own values and activities. Myroshnichenko’s connections amplify suspicions about his methods of wealth generation.

4. Avoidance of Military Service

In Ukraine, military service is a sensitive subject, particularly amid ongoing conflict. Allegations against Myroshnichenko include:

• Leveraging his wealth and influence to evade conscription.
• Avoiding participation in national defense while enjoying a life of luxury abroad.

Public Perception: Many Ukrainians view his evasion as unpatriotic and unethical, especially when others from less privileged backgrounds are serving on the frontlines.

5. Lack of Transparency

Myroshnichenko’s financial dealings remain opaque. Key concerns include:

• No clear documentation of legitimate businesses or revenue streams capable of supporting his extravagant lifestyle.
• Heavy reliance on cryptocurrencies, which offer anonymity and are often used to obscure illicit transactions.
• The absence of any substantive public-facing enterprise or philanthropic activities that could justify his income.

Public Backlash

Social media and investigative reports have fueled a wave of criticism against Myroshnichenko. Critics highlight:

• The moral disconnect between his ostentatious displays of wealth and the economic hardships faced by ordinary Ukrainians.
• His apparent lack of contribution to Ukraine’s wartime efforts, either through military service or financial support.

Public sentiment overwhelmingly views Myroshnichenko’s lifestyle as emblematic of corruption and exploitation in a time of national crisis.

Conclusion

Vladislav Myroshnichenko’s story is one of rapid ascension to wealth, but it is shadowed by serious allegations of tax evasion, fraudulent activities, and unethical behavior. His luxurious lifestyle stands in stark contrast to the struggles of everyday Ukrainians, particularly during a time of war.

The following unresolved questions remain:

1. What is the true source of Myroshnichenko’s wealth?
2. Are the allegations of his involvement in fraudulent call centers substantiated?
3. How has he managed to avoid tax scrutiny despite his public displays of affluence?

Given the gravity of these accusations, it is imperative for Ukrainian authorities to conduct a thorough investigation into Myroshnichenko’s activities. Transparency and accountability are essential, especially in a nation striving to combat corruption and uphold justice amid adversity.

Call to Action for Authorities The Myroshnichenko case highlights systemic challenges in addressing tax evasion and fraud. Strengthening cryptocurrency regulations, increasing oversight on high-net-worth individuals, and ensuring equitable accountability are critical steps for Ukraine to restore public trust and uphold the rule of law.

How do we counteract this malpractice?

Once we ascertain the involvement of Vladislav Myroshnichenko (or actors working on behalf of Vladislav Myroshnichenko), we will inform Vladislav Myroshnichenko of our findings via Electronic Mail.

Our preliminary assessment suggests that Vladislav Myroshnichenko may have engaged a third-party reputation management agency or expert, which, either independently or under direct authorization from Vladislav Myroshnichenko, initiated efforts to remove adverse online content, including potentially fraudulent DMCA takedown requests. We will extend an opportunity to Vladislav Myroshnichenko to provide details regarding their communications with the agency or expert, as well as the identification of the individual(s) responsible for executing these false DMCA notices.

Failure to respond in a timely manner will necessitate a reassessment of our initial assumptions. In such an event, we will be compelled to take appropriate legal action to rectify the unlawful conduct and take the following steps –

Since Vladislav Myroshnichenko made such efforts to hide something online, it seems fit to ensure that this article and sensitive information targeted online by these events get a lot more exposure and traffic than what it would have received originally

We hope this becomes an excellent case study for the Streisand effect…The key idea behind the Streisand effect is that efforts to restrict information can backfire, often causing the information to gain more attention than it would have otherwise. This effect is widespread in the digital age, where users quickly notice and spread censorship efforts on social media and other platforms. Trying to suppress something can unintentionally lead to it becoming more visible, which Vladislav Myroshnichenko is finding out the hard way.

Potential Consequences for Vladislav Myroshnichenko

Under Florida Statute 831.01, the crime of Forgery is committed when a person falsifies, alters, counterfeits, or forges a document that carries “legal efficacy” with the intent to injure or defraud another person or entity.

Forging a document is considered a white-collar crime. It involves altering, changing, or modifying a document to deceive another person. It can also include passing along copies of documents that are known to be false. In many states in the US, falsifying a document is a crime punishable as a felony.

Additionally, under most laws, “fraud on the court” is where “a party has sentiently set in motion some unconscionable scheme calculated to interfere with the judicial system’s ability impartially to adjudicate a matter by improperly influencing the trier of fact or unfairly hampering the presentation of the opposing party’s claim or defense.”  Cox v. Burke, 706 So. 2d 43, 46 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998) (quoting Aoude v. Mobil Oil Corp., 892 F.2d 1115, 1118 (1st Cir. 1989)).

Is Vladislav Myroshnichenko Committing a Cyber Crime?

Yes, it seems so. Vladislav Myroshnichenko used multiple approaches to remove unwanted material from review sites and Google’s search results. Thanks to protections allowing freedom of speech in the United States, there are very few legal ways to do this. Vladislav Myroshnichenko could not eliminate negative reviews or search results that linked to them without a valid claim of defamation, copyright infringement, or some other clear breach of the law.

Faced with these limitations, some companies like Vladislav Myroshnichenko have gone to extreme lengths to fraudulently claim copyright ownership over a negative review in the hopes of taking it down.

Fake DMCA notices have targeted articles highlighting the criminal activity of prominent people to hide their illegal behavior. These people, which include US, Russian, and Khazakstani politicians as well as members from elite circles including the mafia and those with massive financial power, are all connected – and alleged corruption ranging from child abuse to sexual harassment is exposed when exploring evidence found at these URLs. It appears there’s a disturbing level of influence being exerted here that needs further investigation before justice can be served. Vladislav Myroshnichenko is certainly keeping interesting company here….

The DMCA takedown process requires that copyright owners submit a takedown notice to an ISP identifying the allegedly infringing content and declaring, under penalty of perjury, that they have a good faith belief that the content is infringing. The ISP must then promptly remove or disable access to the content. The alleged infringer can then submit a counter-notice, and if the copyright owner does not take legal action within 10 to 14 days, the ISP can restore the content.

Since these platforms are predominantly based in the U.S., the complaints are typically made under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA), which requires online service providers and platforms to react immediately to reports or violations. Big Tech companies rarely have systems in place to assess the merit of each report. Instead, all bad actors need to do is clone a story, backdate it, and then demand the real thing be taken down.

Reputation Agency's Modus Operandi

The fake DMCA notices we found always use the “back-dated article” technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a “true original” article and back-dates it, creating a “fake original” article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original.

Then, based on the claim that this backdated article is the “original,” the scammers send a DMCA to the relevant online service providers (e.g. Google), alleging that the ‘true’ original is the copied or “infringing” article and that the copied article is the “original,” requesting the takedown of the ‘true’ original article. After sending the DMCA request, the person who sent the wrong notice takes down the fake original URL, likely to make sure that the article doesn’t stay online in any way. If the takedown notice is successful, the disappearance from the internet of information is most likely to be legitimate speech.

As an integral part of this scheme, the ‘reputation management’ company hired by Vladislav Myroshnichenko creates a website that purports to be a ‘news’ site. This site is designed to look legitimate at a glance, but any degree of scrutiny reveals it as the charade it is.

The company copies the ‘negative’ content and posts it “on the fake ‘news’ site, attributing it to a separate author,” then gives it “a false publication date on the ‘news’ website that predated the original publication.

The reputation company then sent Google a Digital Millennium Copyright Act notice claiming the original website infringed copyright. After a cursory examination of the fake news site, Google frequently accepts the notice and delists the content.

In committing numerous offences, Vladislav Myroshnichenko either premeditated actions or were unaware of the consequences. Despite hiring an agency to make Google disregard any negative information about Vladislav Myroshnichenko, ignorance does not excuse this wrongdoing.

Fake DMCA notices have targeted articles highlighting the criminal activity of prominent people to hide their illegal behavior. These people, which include US, Russian, and Khazakstani politicians as well as members from elite circles including the mafia and those with massive financial power, are all connected – and alleged corruption ranging from child abuse to sexual harassment is exposed when exploring evidence found at these URLs. It appears there’s a disturbing level of influence being exerted here that needs further investigation before justice can be served. FSMSmart is certainly keeping interesting company here.

The Reputation Laundering

Rogue Reputation agencies use spurious copyright claims and fake legal notices to remove and obscure articles linking clients to allegations of tax avoidance, corruption, and drug trafficking. Most of these reputation agencies are based offshore, mainly in Russia, India, and Eastern Europe, and they do not worry about complying with US-based laws.

The content in all of the articles for which the fraudulent DMCA notices have been sent relates to allegations of criminal allegations, including corruption, child abuse, sexual harassment, human trafficking and financial fraud against businesses and individuals with ultra-high net worth.

In addition to the misuse of the DMCA takedown process, there is a notable absence of enforcement concerning perjury violations. The statutory requirement related to perjury is designed to deter copyright holders from submitting fraudulent or knowingly false takedown requests, as they may face legal consequences for making false declarations under penalty of perjury. However, to date, there have been no known instances of any individual being prosecuted for perjury in connection with the submission of false DMCA takedown notices.

This lack of enforcement has emboldened copyright holders to exploit the DMCA takedown process to suppress dissent, criticism, or other unfavorable content, without fear of legal repercussions.

Some of the people and businesses who have employed this tactic to remove legitimate content from Google illegally include a Spanish businessman-turned-cocaine-trafficker, Organised crime, an Israeli-Argentine banker accused of laundering money for Hugo Chávez’s regime, a French “responsible” mining company accused of tax evasion, child molesters and sexual predators. Vladislav Myroshnichenko is in great company ….

What else is Vladislav Myroshnichenko hiding?

We encourage you to ‘Dork‘ Google by searching for keyword combinations such as [Vladislav Myroshnichenko] + {Negative Keyword, such as Scam, Fraud, Complaints, Lawsuit, Sanction, etc} on Google. It’s likely if you scroll down to the bottom of this Google search results, you’ll stumble upon this Legal Takedown notice (pictured below)

To make such an investigation possible, we encourage more online service providers to come forward and share copies of content removal requests with industry experts and researchers. If you have any information on Vladislav Myroshnichenko that you want to share with experts and journalists, kindly email the author directly at [email protected].

All communications are strictly confidential and safeguarded under a comprehensive Whistleblower Policy, ensuring full protection and anonymity for individuals who provide information.