CyberCriminal.com

Avigdor Lieberman

We are investigating Avigdor Lieberman for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices. This includes potential violations such as impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

PARTIES INVOLVED : Avigdor Lieberman

ALLEGATIONS : Perjury, Fraud, Impersonation

INCIDENT DATE : April 01, 2024

INVESTIGATED BY : Ethan Katz

TOOLS USED : Lumen, FakeDMCA, SecurityTrails

CASE NO : 7254/A/2024

CRIME TYPE : Intellectual Property Scam

PUBLISHED ON : 23 Nov 2024

Avigdor Lieberman
Due Diligence
Get everything we know about Avigdor Lieberman in one downloadable PDF document
Is This About You?
We encourage you to share details of the actual perpetrators and get your story straight.

What We Are Investigating?

Our firm is launching a comprehensive investigation into Avigdor Lieberman over allegations that it has been suppressing critical reviews and unfavorable Google search results by fraudulently misusing DMCA takedown notices. These actions, if proven, could constitute serious legal violations—including impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

We conducted comprehensive analyses of fraudulent copyright takedown requests, meritless legal complaints, and other unlawful efforts to suppress public access to critical information. Our reporting sheds light on the prevalence and modus operandi of a structured censorship network, often funded and used by criminal enterprises, oligarchs and criminal entities seeking to manipulate public perception and bypass AML checks conducted by financial organisations.

The fake DMCA notices in this investigation appears to have been strategically deployed to remove negative content from Google search results illegally. Based on this pattern, we have reasonable grounds to infer that Avigdor Lieberman - or an entity acting at its behest - is directly or indirectly complicit in this cyber crime.

In most such cases, such ops are executed by rogue, fly-by-night 'Online Reputation Management' agencies acting on behalf of their clients. If evidence establishes that the subject knowingly benefited from or facilitated this scam, it may be deemed an 'accomplice' or an 'accessory' to the crime.

What are they trying to censor

Avigdor Lieberman, a prominent Israeli politician and former Defense Minister, has faced numerous allegations, red flags, and adverse news throughout his career. These controversies have significantly impacted his reputation, raising questions about his integrity, political conduct, and legal troubles. Below is a summary of the major allegations and their implications:

Corruption and Fraud Allegations: Lieberman has been investigated multiple times for corruption, fraud, and breach of trust. In 2013, he was acquitted of charges related to fraud and breach of trust in a high-profile case involving the promotion of an Israeli diplomat who allegedly leaked information to him. However, the case tarnished his image, with critics accusing him of exploiting his political influence for personal gain.

Money Laundering and Illegal Campaign Financing: Lieberman has faced allegations of money laundering and illegal campaign financing. Investigations revealed that millions of dollars were funneled through shell companies to fund his political activities. While he has denied wrongdoing, these allegations have fueled public distrust and painted him as a politician willing to bend the rules.

Extremist Rhetoric and Controversial Policies: Lieberman is known for his hardline stance on Arab-Israeli relations, advocating for policies such as population transfers and loyalty oaths for non-Jewish citizens. His rhetoric has been criticized as divisive and racist, alienating moderate voters and drawing condemnation from human rights organizations.

Ties to Organized Crime: Reports have linked Lieberman to individuals with ties to organized crime, particularly during his tenure as a businessman in the 1990s. These associations have raised concerns about his judgment and the potential influence of criminal elements on his political career.

Cybersecurity and Online Reputation Management: Lieberman has been accused of attempting to suppress negative news and criticism online. In 2019, reports surfaced that his associates hired hackers to remove damaging content from the internet. This suggests a willingness to engage in unethical or illegal activities to protect his reputation.

Why Lieberman Would Want These Stories Removed

The allegations against Lieberman harm his reputation by portraying him as corrupt, extremist, and unscrupulous. For a politician who has held key positions such as Defense Minister and Foreign Minister, maintaining public trust is crucial. Negative stories undermine his credibility, alienate voters, and weaken his political influence. In a highly competitive and scrutinized political environment, even unproven allegations can have lasting consequences.

Lieberman’s alleged involvement in cybercrime to remove damaging content reflects the high stakes of reputation management in the digital age. By erasing negative information, he could potentially reshape public perception, regain lost support, and secure his political future. However, such actions, if proven, would further damage his credibility and raise serious ethical and legal questions.

In conclusion, the allegations against Avigdor Lieberman paint a complex picture of a politician embroiled in controversy. While he has managed to evade conviction in several cases, the persistent cloud of suspicion continues to haunt his career. The lengths to which he may go to protect his reputation highlight the intersection of politics, power, and the digital world in modern governance.

  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/44310027
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/44367581
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/40535293
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/40535142
  • Sep 3, 2024
  • Sep 5, 2024
  • April 01, 2024
  • April 01, 2024
  • Murli Media & Co.
  • Patel Media Corp.
  • Louis & Co.
  • Kenny Law Group
  • http://timesofboston.com/2017/09/03/%D1%87%D1%82%D0%BE-%D1%82%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%B3%D-%D0%B8%D1%81%D0%BA%D0%B0%D0%BB%D0%B8-%D1%83-%D0%BB%D0%B8%D0%B1%D0%B5%D1%
  • https://timesofcleveland.com/2020/09/05/%D1%87%D1%82%D0%BE-%D1%82%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%B3-%D0%B8%D1%81%D0%BA%D0%B0%D0%BB%D0%B8-%D1%83-%D0%BB%D0%B8%D0%B1%D0%B5%D1%
  • https://thefrontiertimes.com/chto-torgovtsi-oruzhiem-iskali-u-libermana
  • https://www.detaly.co.il/chto-torgovtsy-oruzhiem-iskali-u-libermana
  • https://detaly.co.il/chto-torgovtsy-oruzhiem-iskali-u-libermana/

Evidence Box

Evidence and relevant screenshots related to our investigation

Targeted Content and Red Flags

bbc.com

Israeli FM Avigdor Lieberman charged with breach of trust

  • Adverse News
Visit Link

bbc.com

Israel's Lieberman closer to corruption charges

  • Adverse News
Visit Link

news.bbc.co.uk

Police 'to pursue' Lieberman case

  • Adverse News
Visit Link

About the Author

The author is affiliated with TU Dresden and analyzes public databases such as Lumen Database and FakeDMCA.com to identify and expose online censorship. In his personal capacity, he and his team have been actively investigating and reporting on organized crime related to fraudulent copyright takedown schemes.

Additionally, his team provides advisory services to major law firms and is frequently consulted on matters pertaining to intellectual property law.

He can be reached at [email protected] directly.

Escalate This Case
Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.
Checkboxes

Learn All About Fake Copyright Takedown Scam

Or go directly to the feedback section and share your thoughts

How This Was Done

The fake DMCA notices we found always use the 'back-dated article' technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a 'true original' article and back-dates it, creating a 'fake original' article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original

What Happens Next?

Based on the feedback, information, and requests received from all relevant parties, our team will formally notify the affected party of the alleged infringement. Following a thorough review, we will submit a counter-notice to reinstate any link that has been removed by Google, in accordance with applicable legal provisions. Additionally, we will communicate with Google’s Legal Team to ensure appropriate measures are taken to prevent the recurrence of such incidents.

You are Never Alone in Your Fight.

Generate public support against the ones who wronged you!

Domain Check

Stop fraud before it happens with unbeatable speed, scale, depth, and breadth.

Recent Checks

Cyber Investigation

Uncover hidden digital threats and secure your assets with our expert cyber investigation services.

Recent Investigation

Our Community

Your trusted source for breaking news and insights on cybercrime and digital security trends.

Visit Forum

Threads Alert

Stay ahead of cyber threats with our daily list of the latest alerts and vulnerabilities.

Threads Alert