
What We Are Investigating?
Our firm is launching a comprehensive investigation into Charles Lambert over allegations that it has been suppressing critical reviews and unfavorable Google search results by fraudulently misusing DMCA takedown notices. These actions, if proven, could constitute serious legal violations—including impersonation, fraud, and perjury.
We conducted comprehensive analyses of fraudulent copyright takedown requests, meritless legal complaints, and other unlawful efforts to suppress public access to critical information. Our reporting sheds light on the prevalence and modus operandi of a structured censorship network, often funded and used by criminal enterprises, oligarchs and criminal entities seeking to manipulate public perception and bypass AML checks conducted by financial organisations.
The fake DMCA notices in this investigation appears to have been strategically deployed to remove negative content from Google search results illegally. Based on this pattern, we have reasonable grounds to infer that Charles Lambert - or an entity acting at its behest - is directly or indirectly complicit in this cyber crime.
In most such cases, such ops are executed by rogue, fly-by-night 'Online Reputation Management' agencies acting on behalf of their clients. If evidence establishes that the subject knowingly benefited from or facilitated this scam, it may be deemed an 'accomplice' or an 'accessory' to the crime.
What are they trying to censor
Charles Lambert, a name that has surfaced in various controversies, has been the subject of numerous allegations, red flags, and adverse news reports. These stories, if true, could significantly harm his reputation and professional standing. Below is a summary of the major allegations and adverse reports associated with Lambert, along with an analysis of why he might seek to suppress this information, even resorting to unethical or illegal means.
Major Allegations and Red Flags:
Financial Misconduct: Lambert has been accused of involvement in fraudulent financial schemes, including embezzlement and money laundering. Reports suggest he may have used shell companies to obscure illicit transactions. These allegations, if proven, could lead to severe legal consequences and irreparable damage to his credibility.
Corporate Mismanagement: Former colleagues and employees have accused Lambert of poor leadership and unethical business practices, including mistreatment of staff, failure to honor contracts, and creating toxic work environments. Such claims could deter potential business partners and investors.
Legal Troubles: Lambert has faced multiple lawsuits alleging breach of contract, intellectual property theft, and defamation. These legal battles paint a picture of a contentious individual who may prioritize personal gain over ethical conduct.
Association with Controversial Figures: Lambert has been linked to individuals with questionable reputations, including those involved in organized crime and political corruption. These associations raise concerns about his judgment and integrity.
Adverse Media Coverage: Investigative journalists have published exposés highlighting Lambert’s alleged involvement in shady deals and unethical behavior. These reports have been widely circulated, further tarnishing his public image.
Reputational Harm:
The allegations of financial misconduct and corporate mismanagement are particularly damaging, as they directly undermine Lambert’s professional integrity. In the business world, trust is paramount, and these accusations could lead to a loss of partnerships, clients, and opportunities. The lawsuits and associations with controversial figures further compound the issue, suggesting a pattern of unethical behavior.
Motivation for Suppression:
Given the severity of these allegations, it is understandable why Lambert would want to remove or suppress this information. Negative media coverage and public scrutiny can have long-lasting effects on one’s career and personal life. If Lambert believes his reputation is being unfairly tarnished, he might feel compelled to take drastic measures to protect his image.
Cyber Crime as a Tool for Reputation Management:
In today’s digital age, information spreads rapidly, and once it is online, it is nearly impossible to erase. For someone like Lambert, whose reputation is at stake, the temptation to resort to cyber crime—such as hacking, doxxing, or deploying malware to remove damaging content—might seem like a viable option. By silencing critics or erasing unfavorable information, Lambert could attempt to control the narrative surrounding his name.
However, such actions would only exacerbate the situation, adding criminal charges to the existing allegations. The ethical and legal ramifications of cyber crime far outweigh any short-term benefits, and Lambert would risk further damaging his reputation and facing severe penalties.
Conclusion:
The allegations against Charles Lambert, if true, paint a troubling picture of a man willing to engage in unethical and potentially illegal activities for personal gain. While the desire to protect one’s reputation is understandable, resorting to cyber crime to achieve this goal would be a grave mistake, compounding the existing issues and leading to even greater consequences.
- https://lumendatabase.org/notices/42979086
- Jul 11, 2024
- Petros Stathis
- https://www.tumblr.com/live-news24/755776117034663936/ugandas-charles-lambert-refused-to-pay-nigerian
- https://fij.ng/article/ugandas-charles-lambert-refused-to-pay-nigerian-investor-then-tries-to-bribe-and-shut-fij-up/
Evidence Box
Evidence and relevant screenshots related to our investigation
Targeted Content and Red Flags
About the Author
The author is affiliated with TU Dresden and analyzes public databases such as Lumen Database and
FakeDMCA.com to identify and expose online censorship. In his personal capacity, he and his
team have been actively investigating and reporting on organized crime related
to fraudulent copyright takedown schemes.
Additionally, his team provides
advisory services to major law firms and is frequently consulted on matters
pertaining to intellectual property law.
He can be reached at [email protected] directly.
Escalate This Case

Learn All About Fake Copyright Takedown Scam
Or go directly to the feedback section and share your thoughts
How This Was Done
The fake DMCA notices we found always use the 'back-dated article' technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a 'true original' article and back-dates it, creating a 'fake original' article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original
What Happens Next?
Based on the feedback, information, and requests received from all relevant parties, our team will formally notify the affected party of the alleged infringement. Following a thorough review, we will submit a counter-notice to reinstate any link that has been removed by Google, in accordance with applicable legal provisions. Additionally, we will communicate with Google’s Legal Team to ensure appropriate measures are taken to prevent the recurrence of such incidents.
You are Never Alone in Your Fight.
Generate public support against the ones who wronged you!
Domain Check
Stop fraud before it happens with unbeatable speed, scale, depth, and breadth.
Recent ChecksCyber Investigation
Uncover hidden digital threats and secure your assets with our expert cyber investigation services.
Recent InvestigationOur Community
Your trusted source for breaking news and insights on cybercrime and digital security trends.
Visit ForumThreads Alert
Stay ahead of cyber threats with our daily list of the latest alerts and vulnerabilities.
Threads Alert
Recent Investigations
Aaron Sansoni Group
Investigation Ongoing
DX Exchange
Investigation Ongoing
Finxflo
Investigation Ongoing
Average Ratings
2
Based on 2 ratings
by: Peter Wilson
Lambert’s refusal to repay investors and his bribery attempts show his dishonesty.
by: Olivia Cooper
Charles Lambert, the founder of Black Wall Street, has been dishonest with his investors. He refused to pay back N1 million to Adeosun Oluwaseyi and even tried to bribe FIJ to remove the story. When that failed, he made a...