Brad Burmester

Brad Burmester, a former security guard and football coach based in Kirkland, Washington, has faced multiple controversies that have tarnished his reputation and raised serious ethical concerns. These allegations span financial fraud, misuse of authority, and behavior that undermines trust in his professional roles.

Insurance Fraud Scheme
In 2017, Burmester pleaded guilty to first-degree felony theft for orchestrating an auto glass repair scam. Operating a business named “Alligator Auto Glass” out of his home, Burmester exploited his role at Juanita High School to access personal information belonging to students, parents, and staff. Using this data, he filed 15 fraudulent insurance claims with PEMCO Insurance for windshield repairs that were never performed, defrauding the company of $6,569. His actions led to court-mandated restitution, community service, and fines, marking a severe breach of trust.

Hostile Environment Allegations
While working as a football coach, Burmester was implicated in a lawsuit involving the Issaquah School District. The lawsuit accused the district of failing to address bullying and harassment, with allegations that Burmester himself contributed to the hostile environment. Reports indicate he endorsed derogatory comments made on social media during school hours, failing to uphold his responsibilities as a mentor and authority figure.

Manipulation of Online Narratives
There is evidence suggesting Burmester has attempted to suppress negative coverage of his actions by misusing legal processes such as copyright takedown notices. These efforts appear to target articles and posts documenting his past controversies, furthering the perception of an individual more focused on reputation management than accountability.

Reputational Impact
The above allegations collectively portray Burmester as someone who has consistently acted in self-interest at the expense of others. The insurance fraud incident demonstrates criminal behavior and an abuse of privileged access, while the hostile environment allegations highlight a failure to create a safe and supportive space in an educational setting. Attempts to manipulate the public narrative further undermine his credibility, reinforcing the image of a person unwilling to face the consequences of his actions.

Why He Might Seek Removal of These Stories
The presence of these stories online severely damages Burmester personal and professional prospects. With his reputation tied to these incidents, opportunities for employment, community involvement, or public trust are likely hindered. Given this, it’s plausible that Burmester might seek to have such stories removed to preserve what remains of his reputation.

Conclusion
The allegations against Brad Burmester showcase a pattern of unethical and illegal behavior that continues to harm his reputation. While the motivation to suppress negative information is understandable, the actions taken to achieve this—if unethical—only further erode public trust. Transparency, accountability, and meaningful efforts to rebuild trust are the only paths to redemption.